ailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Can you caculate with me?
>
>
>
> 0.29295 is what I get...
>
> 930 seconds is 15.5 minutes times .0189 per minute gives me that..
>
> Rick
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ronald Wipl
g List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can you caculate with me?
>
>
> Bob Goddard wrote:
>
> >On Thursday 28 Jul 2005 13:07, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
> >
> >
> >>before I accuse somebody to "overbill" I would like you
Give 'em a break. You just posted this message (and I presume your
support request) seven hours ago. They usually get back to me very
quickly.
--
Tom Hayden
Astoria Telecom, LLC
www.astoriatelecom.net
On 7/28/05, Ronald Wiplinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob Goddard wrote:
>
> >On Thursday
On Thursday 28 Jul 2005 17:25, Waldo Rubinstein wrote:
> Bob,
>
> Definitely not where you went. You got $0.31 because you set your
> calculator to round to 2 decimal places, therefore, what you actually
> did was:
Eh?! I suggest that as well as deleting the old signatures, you
look to see exactly
> -Original Message-
> Adam Dobrin
>
> Bob Goddard wrote:
>
> >On Thursday 28 Jul 2005 13:07, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
> >
> >
> >>before I accuse somebody to "overbill" I would like you to
> calculate
> >>with me:
> >>
> >>Rate: 0.0189 for calling Taiwan via NuFone
> >>
> >>Duratio
Adam Dobrin wrote:
>>>
>>> Rate: 0.0189 for calling Taiwan via NuFone
>>>
>>> Duration: 930 seconds
>>>
>>> Lets vote for the answers:0.7269 or 0.2929 ???
>>>
> I get .31$. Where did you all go to school? Is there a connection
> charge?
???
how about .29 (rounded)
.29295 =
Bob,
Definitely not where you went. You got $0.31 because you set your
calculator to round to 2 decimal places, therefore, what you actually
did was:
930 * 0.02 / 60 = $0.31
Whereas, in our industry, we need to compute rates with far more
decimal places than just 2.
- Waldo
On Jul 28,
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 10:31 -0400, Adam Dobrin wrote:
> Bob Goddard wrote:
>
> >On Thursday 28 Jul 2005 13:07, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
> >
> >
> >>before I accuse somebody to "overbill" I would like you to calculate
> >>with me:
> >>
> >>Rate: 0.0189 for calling Taiwan via NuFone
> >>
> >>Durat
Bob Goddard wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2005 13:07, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
before I accuse somebody to "overbill" I would like you to calculate
with me:
Rate: 0.0189 for calling Taiwan via NuFone
Duration: 930 seconds
Lets vote for the answers:0.7269 or 0.2929 ???
Assuming it
Bob Goddard wrote:
On Thursday 28 Jul 2005 13:07, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
before I accuse somebody to "overbill" I would like you to calculate
with me:
Rate: 0.0189 for calling Taiwan via NuFone
Duration: 930 seconds
Lets vote for the answers:0.7269 or 0.2929 ???
Assuming it
On Thursday 28 Jul 2005 13:07, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
> before I accuse somebody to "overbill" I would like you to calculate
> with me:
>
> Rate: 0.0189 for calling Taiwan via NuFone
>
> Duration: 930 seconds
>
> Lets vote for the answers:0.7269 or 0.2929 ???
Assuming it is per minute;
93
Ronald Wiplinger ha scritto:
Lets vote for the answers:0.7269 or 0.2929 ???
0.2930 :-)
Sergio
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update opti
-Users] Can you caculate with me?
before I accuse somebody to "overbill" I would like you to calculate
with me:
Rate: 0.0189 for calling Taiwan via NuFone
Duration: 930 seconds
Lets vote for the answers:0.7269 or 0.2929 ???
bye
Ronald
before I accuse somebody to "overbill" I would like you to calculate
with me:
Rate: 0.0189 for calling Taiwan via NuFone
Duration: 930 seconds
Lets vote for the answers:0.7269 or 0.2929 ???
bye
Ronald Wiplinger
___
Asterisk-Users mailin
14 matches
Mail list logo
