Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco's CallManager and * (was: Cisco 7960g)(fwd)

2003-07-24 Thread Siggi Langauf
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Yifang Dai wrote: > I wish! My company just spend a lot $$ on the shinny CCM phone system, so I > don't think I can change that easily... But if I can get asterisk to > talk to CCM via h323, and prove it's usefulness, I might have a chance > to use * in the branches... Well,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco's CallManager and * (was: Cisco 7960g) (fwd)

2003-07-24 Thread Kelvin Chua
t; To: "Asterisk user list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 12:37 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco's CallManager and * (was: Cisco 7960g) (fwd) > On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Yifang Dai wrote: > > > I wish! My company just spend a lot $$ on the shin

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco's CallManager and * (was: Cisco 7960g)(fwd)

2003-07-25 Thread Siggi Langauf
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Kelvin Chua wrote: > yes, i agree, we never really felt the need to use unity, *'s vm is > functionally ok with callmanager > (except for the message waiting indication, or is there?) can *'s vm send a > MWI to the callmanager? Not yet. However, CCM supports MWI notification