Mike Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you aren't going for the echo cancellation,
then I think either card will do fine.
We are now deploying only the A200 because we
never know if echo will be an issue or if it can
be tuned away
Thanks, Mike.
That's a good point in favour of the A200
John Novack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though many will probably disagree, you will be
LOTS better off with the Sangoma A200 It is MUCH
more forgiving regarding Motherboards and the
PCI 2.2 requirement,
That's one of my concerns. I'm working with
refurbished hardware, so don't have much freedom
Chris Bagnall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The site in Northampton with 3 FXO has been an
absolute nightmare over the last 9 months the
system's been in place.
Once asterisk 1.2 was deployed, things improved
remarkably.
Do you think that was improved code in v1.2, or
the result of your
Evening all.
I'm looking at building an Asterisk system for one
of the projects of the Charity where I'm the
SysAdmin.
The project has two analogue phone lines - BT
Featureline Compact, we're in the UK - that I'd
like Asterisk to handle.
My current quandary is which FXO interface to use.
I've
Nick Chalk wrote:
Evening all.
I'm looking at building an Asterisk system for one
of the projects of the Charity where I'm the
SysAdmin.
The project has two analogue phone lines - BT
Featureline Compact, we're in the UK - that I'd
like Asterisk to handle.
My current quandary is which FXO
Though many will probably disagree, you will be LOTS better off with the
Sangoma A200
It is MUCH more forgiving regarding Motherboards and the PCI 2.2
requirement, even though the software installation instructions leave
much to be desired for the inexperienced, it does work, and Sangoma
I've no experience with the A200, so I can't really pass judgement on it. We
have 2 sites with TDM400P cards currently deployed (one with 3 FXO, the
other with 1 FXO and 3 FXS). The site in Northampton with 3 FXO has been an
absolute nightmare over the last 9 months the system's been in place.
