Are others seeing hugh delays and/or lack of connectivity to Digium?
Rich
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mail
Rich Adamson wrote:
Are others seeing hugh delays and/or lack of connectivity to Digium?
Rich
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lis
nt: Friday, February 13, 2004 01:54 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Digium connectivity issue?
>
> Are others seeing hugh delays and/or lack of connectivity to Digium?
>
> Rich
>
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PRO
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 07:54:50AM -0600, Rich Adamson wrote:
>
> Are others seeing hugh delays and/or lack of connectivity to Digium?
Yeah. Traceroutes stop at their provider. They are either having
connectivity issues (if they have dsl/T1/whatever into their facility)
or server problems if colo
150 West Park Loop
Huntsville, AL 35806
Seems to be working now though
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Deepakumar JV
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 7:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium connectivity issue
Yes - not much seems to be creeping out of the list servers.
Iain
--On Friday, February 13, 2004 07:54:50 -0600 Rich Adamson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are others seeing hugh delays and/or lack of connectivity to Digium?
Rich
___
Asterisk-Users mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium connectivity issue?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rich Adamson wrote:
> Are others seeing hugh delays and/or lack of connectivity to Digium?
>
> Rich
>
>
> ___
> Asterisk-
e you can make a difference - everyone will appreciate you
then instead of grumbling.
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:11:44 -0500
> From: John Fraizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium connectivity issue?
&
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium connectivity issue?Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rich Adamson wrote:
> Are others seeing hugh delays and/or lack of connectivity to Digium?> > Rich> > > ___> Asterisk-Users mai
> I am having same problem and i was never successful in connecting to
> digium.com or asterisk.org or asteriskpbx.org for last three days.
We've been moving our office but we are now in the new location and
hopefully won't have any more trouble. Thanks!
Mark
___
But CVS was alive the whole time! ;)
bkw
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Mark Spencer wrote:
> > I am having same problem and i was never successful in connecting to
> > digium.com or asterisk.org or asteriskpbx.org for last three days.
>
> We've been moving our office but we are now in the new location an
Brian West wrote:
But CVS was alive the whole time! ;)
bkw
Um, no it wasn't.
For all practical purposes, *.digium.com was dead. Why? Because even
though there is a second "cvs.digium.com" out there on a different network,
the nameservers digium.com are both on the same network - the network t
John Fraizer wrote:
There are several entities out there who will do secondary DNS for free.
You might want to look into that.
If you pull their NS entries from one of the root servers, you get:
digium.com. 172800 IN NS bos.nameserver.net.
digium.com. 172800 IN
And without the secondaries knowing they're authoritative for the zone,
things don't work right.
John
David Coulson wrote:
John Fraizer wrote:
There are several entities out there who will do secondary DNS for
free. You might want to look into that.
If you pull their NS entries from one of t
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 12:18:03PM -0500, John Fraizer wrote:
> There are several entities out there who will do secondary DNS for free.
I'll do secondary DNS if they want.
Tim
--
><
>> Tim Sailer ><
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, John Fraizer wrote:
>
> Brian West wrote:
> > But CVS was alive the whole time! ;)
> >
> > bkw
>
> Um, no it wasn't.
>
> For all practical purposes, *.digium.com was dead. Why? Because even
> though there is a second "cvs.digium.com" out there on a different network,
Yep thats what it looks like :(
bkw
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, John Fraizer wrote:
>
> And without the secondaries knowing they're authoritative for the zone,
> things don't work right.
>
> John
>
>
> David Coulson wrote:
> > John Fraizer wrote:
> >
> >> There are several entities out there who will d
17 matches
Mail list logo
