Re: [Asterisk-Users] Echo Canceller usage

2005-12-15 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Richard Scobie wrote: Or have I misunderstood how Zap EC works? Yes. The channels on the board are completely independent of each other. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update

[Asterisk-Users] Echo Canceller usage

2005-12-15 Thread Richard Scobie
Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Individually? Yes... but I don't know how else you are thinking it would be applied. Apologies for breaking the thread. Just trying to get an idea of how things work together. I had considered that in this scenario, the echo can on the FXS only has to deal with a tail

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Echo Canceller usage

2005-12-15 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Richard Scobie wrote: Using a TDM400P with an FXO module and an FXS module, and a zapata.conf with "echocancel=yes" above both channel definitions, is echo cancelling applied individually to each module when a call is made out to the PSTN? Individually? Yes... but I don't know how else you are

[Asterisk-Users] Echo Canceller usage

2005-12-15 Thread Richard Scobie
Using a TDM400P with an FXO module and an FXS module, and a zapata.conf with "echocancel=yes" above both channel definitions, is echo cancelling applied individually to each module when a call is made out to the PSTN? Regards, Richard ___ --Bandwidth