Hi, some questions/comments about performance/utility of * and * hardware
I've been reading this list for a few weeks and I think I have
compiled the better feelings of the users.
please correct me if I'm wrong, still learning *
Will be nice to see something like this in a wiki.
After being f
Erick Perez wrote:
Hi, some questions/comments about performance/utility of * and * hardware
I've been reading this list for a few weeks and I think I have
compiled the better feelings of the users.
please correct me if I'm wrong, still learning *
Will be nice to see something like this in a w
6b- More than 50 calls VoIP to POTS/T1/E1 will kill an * box due to
excesive transcoding??
6bb- unless using quad machines, plenty of RAM and DSP cards?
The max number of calls is something that's not really a hard-and-fast
number. There's been numerous discussions regarding *'s "upper lim
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 18:51 +0100, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> >> 6b- More than 50 calls VoIP to POTS/T1/E1 will kill an * box due to
> >> excesive transcoding??
> >> 6bb- unless using quad machines, plenty of RAM and DSP cards?
> >
> > The max number of calls is something that's not real
For the brave, you can test it out yourself (if you can get the beta to
work without documentation) with the callgenerator on
http://www.astertest.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4
Its far from finished, but it can be used.
zoa.
Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 18:51 +0100, Roy Sigurd Karl