How does that look?
Thanks for your response!
++Amaru
--- On Fri, 9/5/08, Bryce Chidester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bryce Chidester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion asterisk
assistance! I apprecaite it very much!
++Amaru
--- On Mon, 9/8/08, Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
No, but you can use a dedicated DID, but that will NOT detect the
tone, it will simply ASSume that the caller is trying to send a fax.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:42 PM, JD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generic question,
Is there a way to detect a fax call without actually taking it as a fax
call?
I knew of this, but mostly ignored it since the zapata.conf method is a
universal function. Either a channel (or channel group) does fax
detection or it doesn't. I can't change it in the ongoing script.
In other words, if a call is going to a DID that _shouldn't_ do faxing,
it goes to the fax
Hello,
I have a Sangoma A104d T1 card, a Rhino 24-port FXS box, and am running
Asterisk 1.4.21.2
FAXing works, but not so reliably. I'm wondering what I might have to do in
order to make this work. I have my FAX machines connected to individial
FXS ports on my Rhino FXS channel bank, and that
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:19 -0700, Amaru Netapshaak wrote:
I have a Sangoma A104d T1 card, a Rhino 24-port FXS box, and am
running
Asterisk 1.4.21.2
I think you're mostly right on this setup, but I wonder if your A104d is
doing some hardware echo cancellation on these calls. If I'm not
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Bob Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:19 -0700, Amaru Netapshaak wrote:
I have a Sangoma A104d T1 card, a Rhino 24-port FXS box, and am
running
Asterisk 1.4.21.2
I think you're mostly right on this setup, but I wonder if your A104d is
Yep... your A104d has HWEC onboard (as signified by the 'd' on your model). It
is necessary to set echocancel=no and probably echocancelwhenbridged=no in your
zapata.conf to get reliable faxing to work.
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Engineer
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
- Bob Pierce
If I am not mistaken every single echo canceler out there will disable
itself if it detects a fax tone.
Echo Cancelers do not screw up faxes, people screw up faxes. 8-)
Bob Pierce wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:19 -0700, Amaru Netapshaak wrote:
I have a Sangoma A104d T1 card, a Rhino 24-port
I would not bother with fax detection with fax DIDs and on T1s/PRIs.
The fewer the modules that you need to rely on and load, the better.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
1.888.777.1888
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Eric ManxPower Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If I am not mistaken every single echo
Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
If I am not mistaken every single echo canceler out there will disable
itself if it detects a fax tone.
Echo Cancelers do not screw up faxes, people screw up faxes. 8-)
Never underestimate how ghetto an echo canceller can be. :-)
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste
I'm having problems exactly with that tone detection. I even submitted a bug
report (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13286) but it still has not been
viewed yet, I guess.
Atenciosamente,
Vinícius Fontes
Núcleo de Tecnologias Convergentes
Canall Tecnologia em Comunicações
Passo Fundo - RS
: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: Friday, September 5, 2008, 4:43 PM
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:19 -0700, Amaru Netapshaak wrote:
I have a Sangoma A104d T1 card, a Rhino 24-port FXS box, and am
: [asterisk-users] FAX over T1 Question
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: Friday, September 5, 2008, 4:43 PM
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:19 -0700, Amaru Netapshaak wrote:
I have a Sangoma A104d T1 card, a Rhino 24-port FXS box, and am
Hi all, I'm trying to send fax from Hylafax to a remote fax machine
through Asterisk and cisco 2801 as E1 gateway.
This is my architecture:
sendfax - HylaFax - iaxmodem - Asterisk - (SIP) 2801 with E1 card
For incoming fax I don't have any problem, but I'm not able to send fax
out of 2801.
My
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Enrico Pasqualotto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I'm trying to send fax from Hylafax to a remote fax machine
through Asterisk and cisco 2801 as E1 gateway.
This is my architecture:
sendfax - HylaFax - iaxmodem - Asterisk - (SIP) 2801 with E1 card
For
Hello,
I asked myself the same questions as obviously, Asterisk 1.6 introduces new
T.38 functions and it's still a bit difficult to know what's really missing
to set a system up just as you suggested.
Is it possible to use Asterisk as a T.30/T.38 gateway ?
If positive, which software are needed,
Arturo Ochoa schrieb:
Dear list,
I got this scenario…
FAX Machine - FXS (tdm800) -Asterisk - SIP - OPENSER - SIP -
Asterisk - FXO(tdm400) - PSTN - FAX Machine
I’ been reading a lot of Faxes and t.38 protocol... and I found that
Asterisk 1.6 has the possibility to do FAX t.38 Gateway
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Guillermo
Salas M.
Enviado el: Thursday, August 07, 2008 2:00 PM
Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] FAX t.38 on Asterisk 1.6?
El jue, 07-08-2008 a las 13:31 -0600, Arturo Ochoa escribió
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Guillermo Salas M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El jue, 07-08-2008 a las 13:31 -0600, Arturo Ochoa escribió:
Has anyone have experiencies on this kind of scenario... what
version?.. patches?... or any information regarding this goal will be
VERY helpful...
Hi
On Aug 7, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Arturo Ochoa wrote:
I got this scenario…
FAX Machine - FXS (tdm800) -Asterisk - SIP - OPENSER - SIP -
Asterisk - FXO(tdm400) - PSTN - FAX Machine
Asterisk 1.6 currently has T.38 origination and termination support.
It does not yet have fax gateway support.
Asterisk 1.6 currently has T.38 origination and termination support.
It does not yet have fax gateway support.
--
Russell Bryant
Russell, Can you please clarify what you mean. I think there is still a bit
of confusion as to what termination and gateway and Asterisk 1.6 is all
about,
On Aug 8, 2008, at 7:39 AM, JR Richardson wrote:
Asterisk 1.6 currently has T.38 origination and termination support.
It does not yet have fax gateway support.
--
Russell Bryant
Russell, Can you please clarify what you mean. I think there is
still a bit
of confusion as to what
JR Richardson wrote:
Asterisk 1.6 currently has T.38 origination and termination support.
It does not yet have fax gateway support.
--
Russell Bryant
Russell, Can you please clarify what you mean. I think there is still a bit
of confusion as to what termination and gateway and Asterisk
. Arturo Ochoa N
Electrosystems S RL
Tel. (656)-6230794
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Russell Bryant
Enviado el: Friday, August 08, 2008 7:25 AM
Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] FAX t
Dear list,
I got this scenario.
FAX Machine - FXS (tdm800) -Asterisk - SIP - OPENSER - SIP -
Asterisk - FXO(tdm400) - PSTN - FAX Machine
I' been reading a lot of Faxes and t.38 protocol... and I found that
Asterisk 1.6 has the possibility to do FAX t.38 Gateway funtion...and also
that
El jue, 07-08-2008 a las 13:31 -0600, Arturo Ochoa escribió:
Has anyone have experiencies on this kind of scenario... what
version?.. patches?... or any information regarding this goal will be
VERY helpful...
Hi Arturo,
Please ckeck the following URL (on spanish):
Electrosystems S RL
Tel. (656)-6230794
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Guillermo
Salas M.
Enviado el: Thursday, August 07, 2008 2:00 PM
Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] FAX t.38 on Asterisk
Thanks Steve! I am reading more about IAXModem and HYlafax, and I follow
step by step what you wrote to setup my fax solution that works great.
Thanks again
Gustavo A. González
Dto. de Infraestructura
Despegar.com, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Hello! I need to send Faxes from an Asterisk box to an Asterisk + Iaxmodem +
Hylafax installed on other box. I have setup IAX trunks between this boxes,
all works fine but can´t send faxes from one to other, Im trying with or
without NVFaxDetect application but does not work. Is there a way to
El mar, 01-07-2008 a las 10:35 -0300, Gustavo A Gonzalez escribió:
Hello! I need to send Faxes from an Asterisk box to an Asterisk +
Iaxmodem + Hylafax installed on other box. I have setup IAX trunks
between this boxes, all works fine but can´t send faxes from one to
other, Im trying with or
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gustavo A
Gonzalez
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 9:35 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Fax Between IAX Trunks
Hello! I need to send Faxes from an Asterisk box to an Asterisk + Iaxmodem
@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Fax Between IAX Trunks
Hello! I need to send Faxes from an Asterisk box to an Asterisk + Iaxmodem +
Hylafax installed on other box. I have setup IAX trunks between this boxes,
all works fine but can´t send faxes from one to other, Im trying
I am trying with ulaw/alaw codecs, both boxes are in the same LAN. The first
box have Asterisk 1.2 and the other have installed Asterisk 1.4, I can do
calls between boxes without problem. So the solution for this model is
connect both server through a crossover cable?.
Gustavo A. González
Crossover will certainly help with IP issues such as latency.
I think your problem is that you don't really understand how IAXmodem
and Hylafax work.
Here is a link to a well documented Hylafax installation that I did
for a fairly large mortgage company. Alex came in after me and did a
great
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 06:53:34PM -0400, Matt Watson wrote:
On June 9, 2008 01:34:31 pm Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
You should not expect FaxOverVoiceOverIPOverInternet to work well. If
you stick to ulaw codec for the entire call, it might work well enough
for your use, but it might
@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax on FXS
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 06:53:34PM -0400, Matt Watson wrote:
On June 9, 2008 01:34:31 pm Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
You should not expect FaxOverVoiceOverIPOverInternet to work well. If
you stick to ulaw codec for the entire call, it might work
://www.mattgwatson.ca
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 4:10 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax on FXS
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 06:53:34PM -0400, Matt Watson wrote
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:15:49AM -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
IP can be run over many things. Internet, Local LAN, Corporate WAN,
VPN, etc Each of these things have different characteristics and so I
add them to the list. FaxOverVoiceOverIPOverLAN is something that has a
good
going down
that road :)
--
Matt
http://www.mattgwatson.ca
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 4:10 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax on FXS
On Mon, Jun
I've been thinking about something around these lines that I'd like feedback
on. What I'd like to d,o if it works, is have a fax machine in St. Louis
connected up to my asterisk box in Atlanta via Internet/SIP so that anytime
the fax machine in St Louis sends a fax it actually goes out through
You should not expect FaxOverVoiceOverIPOverInternet to work well. If
you stick to ulaw codec for the entire call, it might work well enough
for your use, but it might not.
John Morey wrote:
I've been thinking about something around these lines that I'd like feedback
on. What I'd like to
On 6/9/08, John Morey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been thinking about something around these lines that I'd like feedback
on. What I'd like to d,o if it works, is have a fax machine in St. Louis
connected up to my asterisk box in Atlanta via Internet/SIP so that anytime
the fax machine in
John Morey wrote:
actually goes out through the asterisk box in Atlanta. Something if I
understand it correctly like : Fax-SIP(long
distance)-Asterisk-FXO-Customer Fax. Would something like this work?
Not reliably,
if you have a VPN connection to the remote site (We do with our remote
Thanks all for the info. Yes I do have HylaFAX running and was thinking
about either the print-to-fax or email-to-fax route but for some reason the
remote site loves to write stuff on the faxes before they send them. It's
something, the writing on the fax, they are not used to and I've been told
On June 9, 2008 12:57:11 pm John Morey wrote:
I've been thinking about something around these lines that I'd like
feedback on. What I'd like to d,o if it works, is have a fax machine in
St. Louis connected up to my asterisk box in Atlanta via Internet/SIP so
that anytime the fax machine in St
John Morey wrote:
Thanks all for the info. Yes I do have HylaFAX running and was
thinking about either the print-to-fax or email-to-fax route but for
some reason the remote site loves to write stuff on the faxes before
they send them. It's something, the writing on the fax, they are not
On June 9, 2008 01:34:31 pm Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
You should not expect FaxOverVoiceOverIPOverInternet to work well. If
you stick to ulaw codec for the entire call, it might work well enough
for your use, but it might not.
Just as an FYI - you have too many Over's in your
Hi List;
What configuration needed to let my FXS send and
receive FAX?
Regards
Bilal
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
On June 7, 2008 11:37:20 am bilal ghayyad wrote:
Hi List;
What configuration needed to let my FXS send and
receive FAX?
Your probably going to need to give some more details about your setup before
anybody can help you... theres really nothing special you need to configure
for an FXS port
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 08:37:20AM -0700, bilal ghayyad wrote:
Hi List;
What configuration needed to let my FXS send and
receive FAX?
Technically nothing. A fax behaves just like a normal phone device.
What you should be careful about is the path from the PSTN to that FXS
port.
--
and modem-relay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Watson
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 1:00 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax on FXS
On June 7, 2008 11:37:20 am bilal ghayyad
Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then check out Hylafax and IAXmodem. Hylafax has alot of client apps
too. As I said before, it is CPU intensive, so you may need separate
machines to handle fax. A direct crossover cable for network is the
best to eliminate any latency.
If you run
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Benny Amorsen wrote:
Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then check out Hylafax and IAXmodem. Hylafax has alot of client apps
too. As I said before, it is CPU intensive, so you may need separate
machines to handle fax. A direct crossover cable for network is the
2008/5/22 Gordon Henderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
On Thu, 22 May 2008, Benny Amorsen wrote:
Steve Totaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then check out Hylafax and IAXmodem. Hylafax has alot of client apps
too. As I said before, it is CPU intensive, so you may need separate
Benny Amorsen wrote:
Now, what's the story on Hylafax+? How is that different from Hylafax?
See:
http://hylafax.sourceforge.net/about.php
Thanks,
Lee.
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing
Gordon Henderson wrote:
Something that's always confused me - IAXmodem is built on spandsp. RxFAX
is also built on spandsp. RxFAX gets one step closer to the data stream
(no copper/IP in the way), so why are people using ( suggesting) Hylafax
over RxFAX?
spandsp includes a lot of
Gordon Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
RxFAX gets one step closer to the data stream (no copper/IP in the
way), so why are people using ( suggesting) Hylafax over RxFAX?
When we piloted our deployment, rxfax didn't manage to receive faxes
correctly as often as Hylafax did. We never found
Of Steve Totaro
Sent: Wednesday, 21 May 2008 10:55 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax solution for Asterisk
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Sanjay Rajdev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We would like to do something similar to efax, where we can
: [asterisk-users] Fax solution for Asterisk
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Steve Totaro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
You may need an additional
server just to handle faxes if you are running many instances
We are using Asterisk 1.4.13 on FC6 and have a T1 card with 20 DID's.
We are wanting to use one of the DID's for Fax, is this possible or do we have
to add some addition Hardware and what is the best way to do this.
I know that similar thing would have been asked multiple time already, but I
Sanjay Rajdev wrote:
We are using Asterisk 1.4.13 on FC6 and have a T1 card with 20 DID's.
We are wanting to use one of the DID's for Fax, is this possible or do
we have to add some addition Hardware and what is the best way to do this.
http://iaxmodem.sourceforge.net
Thanks,
Lee.
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sanjay Rajdev wrote:
We are using Asterisk 1.4.13 on FC6 and have a T1 card with 20 DID's.
We are wanting to use one of the DID's for Fax, is this possible or do
we have to add some addition Hardware and what is the best way
,
New Delhi
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax solution for Asterisk
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sanjay Rajdev wrote:
We are using Asterisk 1.4.13 on FC6 and have a T1 card with 20 DID's.
We are wanting to use one of the DID's for Fax, is this possible
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Sanjay Rajdev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about outbound faxing.
Regards,
Sanjay Rajdev
How about it? Describe your needs. There are different ways of doing
the same thing, it all depends on needs.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
: [asterisk-users] Fax solution for Asterisk
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Sanjay Rajdev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about outbound faxing.
Regards,
Sanjay Rajdev
How about it? Describe your needs. There are different ways of doing
the same thing, it all depends on needs.
Thanks
On May 21, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Sanjay Rajdev wrote:
We are using Asterisk 1.4.13 on FC6 and have a T1 card with 20 DID's.
We are wanting to use one of the DID's for Fax, is this possible or
do we have to add some addition Hardware and what is the best way to
do this.
I know that similar
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Niles Ingalls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 21, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Sanjay Rajdev wrote:
We are using Asterisk 1.4.13 on FC6 and have a T1 card with 20 DID's.
We are wanting to use one of the DID's for Fax, is this possible or do we
have to add some addition
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 8:21:38 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai,
New Delhi
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax solution for Asterisk
We would like to do
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Sanjay Rajdev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We would like to do something similar to efax, where we can send mail to
send fax or something similar. I tried to install Asterisk Fax
http://asterfax.sourceforge.net/ but was not able to compile it with
Asterisk
Steve Totaro wrote:
You may need an additional
server just to handle faxes if you are running many instances as they
are CPU intensive.
iaxmodem is not CPU intensive. 100 of them aren't. You can put that
many on a typical modern machine and have them all faxing simultaneously
and not see a
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
You may need an additional
server just to handle faxes if you are running many instances as they
are CPU intensive.
iaxmodem is not CPU intensive. 100 of them aren't. You can put that
many on a
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Steve Totaro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
You may need an additional
server just to handle faxes if you are running many instances as they
are CPU intensive.
iaxmodem is
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas van dem Helge wrote:
Cisco gateway with T.38 support. That's the only real way to do faxing
through asterisk.
Although this statement has marginally more truth to it given the
SIP-only context that the original
and to the OP about the hardware, even a cheap grandsteam ATA will
work just fine... that's what I use on my personal fax machine and it
has no issues. I can't recall a time this year a fax has failed. This
is going over the public internet and then also back out to a voip
provider. We do use
Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Note that if you have a fax machine that performs some variant of T.37
(fax-over-email) and you have an on-line service provider that is
willing to work with you... then you can rather easily get your fax
machine faxing through their service. (Which is
2008/5/20 Benny Amorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Note that if you have a fax machine that performs some variant of T.37
(fax-over-email) and you have an on-line service provider that is
willing to work with you... then you can rather
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax Machine Options
Cisco gateway with T.38 support. That's the only real way to do faxing
through asterisk. I think a VG200 with newer firmware will support SIP
+ T.38 but don't buy on my suggestion because I've never used that
device outside call
Matt Watson wrote:
I believe Asterisk 1.6 with app_fax supports T.38 origination and
termination, that is not gatewaying, however if origination and termination
are already there, gatewaying should be fairly trivial to implement. I
haven't actually tested 1.6 using T.38, however I have
T.38 gateway is a totally different problem than T.38
origination/termination. They share very little code, and almost none of
their design.
Regards,
Steve
Well,
It turns out their SIP provider doesn't support the T.38 protocol for faxing.
Their statement is if you really need it, use ulaw and
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
It turns out their SIP provider doesn't support the T.38 protocol for faxing.
Their statement is if you really need it, use ulaw and AstraFax? I don't
understand
how AstraFax makes a difference in the process?
It doesn't make a difference. uLaw over SIP/UDP still
Benny Amorsen wrote:
Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Note that if you have a fax machine that performs some variant of T.37
(fax-over-email) and you have an on-line service provider that is
willing to work with you... then you can rather easily get your fax
machine faxing through
Lee Howard wrote:
As I tried to indicate in my first reply... I would encourage you to
order an analog phone line for that fax machine. There are other
options, but in most cases the customer is happy to pay the line charge.
When you go the analog POTS line route it just works. No messing
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax Machine Options
Matt Watson wrote:
I believe Asterisk 1.6 with app_fax supports T.38 origination and
termination, that is not gatewaying, however if origination and termination
are already there, gatewaying should be fairly
Is my only solution to add a fax machine to our VOIP only setup by using an
IAXy?
I should specify the office people want a traditional fax machine in the sense
that
fax's be sent and received from a physical unit, they don't want an email to
fax setup.
They have a dedicated sip did provisioned
Cisco gateway with T.38 support. That's the only real way to do faxing
through asterisk. I think a VG200 with newer firmware will support SIP
+ T.38 but don't buy on my suggestion because I've never used that
device outside call manager configuration.
Or see if your VoIP provider supports T.38
Andreas van dem Helge wrote:
Cisco gateway with T.38 support. That's the only real way to do faxing
through asterisk.
Although this statement has marginally more truth to it given the
SIP-only context that the original poster provided, it is still
substantially inaccurate.
There are several
Hi,
Is it possible for me to detect fax on a sip trunk?
my provider has a fax service that can send/receive
fax.
is it possible that i use a that trunk as a telefax?
meaning i will try to detect if it's a fax, if it is i
will forward it to an extension that can handle fax if
not will forward it
Hi all,
I want to be able to achieve the incoming fax inside mysql along with the
dailed number and CID. I understand one way to do it is to do a
fax-to-email to a centralized adress and then use procmail to do the db
storing. I am just wondering if there is a more straight forward why of
doing
I am using the rxfax and txfax application with Asterisk 1.4.18. When
ever I try sending or receiving a fax, my Asterisk dies. I tried to
enable debug to see what happens, but I have no clue why it happens.
Please help me out.
--
Regards,
Nasir.
Hello everyone,
Some months ago there were news about J2 filing lawsuits against companies
using fax-to-email technology, as they claimed it was their patent. They had
also won some cases, until someone filed a counter lawsuit against them
based some other grounds but again related to
Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:
Hello everyone,
Some months ago there were news about J2 filing lawsuits against
companies using fax-to-email technology, as they claimed it was their
patent. They had also won some cases, until someone filed a counter
lawsuit against them based some other grounds
Hi,
I was recently trying out with AMD (Answering Machine Detect) to detect the
status of my call if it being picked up by HUMAN or MACHINE.
Just want to know if any supporting features in asterisk 1.4.11 to detect if
the call enters the Fax machine.
Please provide the documentation link if
Hi,
I was recently trying out with AMD (Answering Machine Detect) to detect the
status of my call if it being picked up by HUMAN or MACHINE.
Just want to know if any supporting features in asterisk 1.4.11 to detect if
the call enters the Fax machine.
Please provide the documentation link
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 20:45:08 -0500 (EST), Alex Balashov wrote:
This sounds like the app_rxfax module has a dependency on some other
module which implements T.30 handling, and that this module is either
not loaded, or that its symbol table is not being shared in the
monolithic core.
there's
Hi people,
I'm tring to configure fax on my asterisk server. I'm using the
instructions of: http://www.asteriskguru.com/tutorials/spandsp.html and
the files app_rxfax.c, app_txfax.c and apps_Makefile_patch from:
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/snapshots/spandsp/test-apps-asterisk-1.2/
I
Everton,
This sounds like the app_rxfax module has a dependency on some other
module which implements T.30 handling, and that this module is either
not loaded, or that its symbol table is not being shared in the monolithic
core.
-- Alex
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Everton Goularth wrote:
Hi
On 8/29/07, Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carlos Chavez wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 00:03 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:11:03PM +0200, Christian Peter wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running current SpanDSP
- Original Message -
From: Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:36 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax Problems with SpanDSP
Alan Lord wrote:
Steve Davies
On 8/29/07, Christian Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 29.08.2007, 20:13 +0800 schrieb Steve Underwood:
Christian Peter wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running current SpanDSP
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre6.tgz
with Asterisk 1.2.22 somewhat
401 - 500 of 1425 matches
Mail list logo
