Conall O'Brien wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently looking at FXO options to provide a POTS line to Asterisk to
trunk calls with.
Does anyone have any experience using the Linksys Sipura 3201 as an FXO
device for Asterisk?
I use one at home and can recommend it as functional and reliable.
Hi,
I'm currently looking at FXO options to provide a POTS line to Asterisk to
trunk calls with.
i've had some problems setting the disconnect tone correctly to my
country. As a matter of fact, i still do, as the calculated values does
not always hang up the phone.
Other than this i
Hello,
I'm currently looking at FXO options to provide a POTS line to Asterisk to
trunk calls with.
Does anyone have any experience using the Linksys Sipura 3201 as an FXO device
for Asterisk?
Thanks
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Conall O'Brien wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently looking at FXO options to provide a POTS line to Asterisk to
trunk calls with.
Does anyone have any experience using the Linksys Sipura 3201 as an FXO
device for Asterisk?
I just did this
Jon Gabrielson wrote:
On Thursday 05 May 2005 05:28 pm, Joseph wrote:
It has 1-FXS and one 1-Life Line (it is pass through type)
I've seen the pass-through term used alot and
I'm not quite for sure what that means. What is the
difference between a passthrough type and a regular
FXO. What can
-Users] FXO ATA?
I've been looking at something similar, but with more ports. Something
to handle the incoming (FXO) analog lines, but without the investment in
a channel bank and T1 card because we only need 4-8 FXOs and no FXS.
I've looked at the AudioCodes MP104 which looks like it will take
Why not go with Multitech? They are expensive, but great units.
For the same cost I could get a T1 card and a channel bank on Ebay and have
change left over. These are exepense units.
Chris Mason
www.anguillaguide.com
Tel: (305) 704-7249 Fax: (815)301-9759
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 04:24:32AM -0500, Eric Wieling aka ManxPower said:
Jon Gabrielson wrote:
On Thursday 05 May 2005 05:28 pm, Joseph wrote:
It has 1-FXS and one 1-Life Line (it is pass through type)
I've seen the pass-through term used alot and
I'm not quite for sure what that means.
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 04:24 -0500, Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:
I just checked my dictionary and it defines pass-thru as meaning
totally useless for most people. Pass-thru and lifeline seem to be
different terms for the same thing. i.e. The FXO port is connected
to
the FXS port in
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon
Gabrielson
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 5:52 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FXO ATA?
The AG-168E has an FXO port?
The only seller I can find seems to think it is just
On Thursday 05 May 2005 10:27 pm, Tim Connolly wrote:
Pass through has the same functionality as a modem with a line and a
phone connection. Line is where you plug in the dialtone, the dial passes
through the phone connection unless the card picks up (like a modem
does).
I have a X100P clone
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FXO ATA?
Why not go with Multitech? They are expensive, but great units.
Because they are ridiculously expensive.
It is true that Multitech's VOIP gear is very good stuff. I've used it
and it just works. But apparently, their marketing people haven't been
[snip]
I totall agree with that comment. Multitech is just a rip-off, when you
compare the products with others existing in the market.
Seshu
I just checked their pricing:
Multitech:
MVP2102-Port VOIP Gateway $899.00
MVP4104-Port VOIP Gateway $1499.00
All I can say WOW!!! (speechless)
On Thu, 5 May 2005 08:07:14 -0400, Chris Mason (Lists) wrote:
Is the Sipura 3000 the only way to interface a remote pstn line and connect
incoming calls to Asterisk? I have a location connected by network that has
a phone line, when the room is occupied I want the line ti ring there as
normal,
Is the Sipura 3000 the only way to interface a remote pstn line and connect
incoming calls to Asterisk? I have a location connected by network that has
a phone line, when the room is occupied I want the line ti ring there as
normal, but when the employee is travelling I want the line to be
: Thursday, May 05, 2005 8:07 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FXO ATA?
Is the Sipura 3000 the only way to interface a remote pstn line and
connect incoming calls to Asterisk? I have a location connected by
network that has a phone line, when
On 5/5/05, Chris Mason (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the Sipura 3000 the only way to interface a remote pstn line and connect
incoming calls to Asterisk? I have a location connected by network that has
a phone line, when the room is occupied I want the line ti ring there as
normal, but
[snip]
Nothing really can touch the sipura's for features, ease of use, and
their very good documentation. Even if there was another product for
half the price I would probably still use the spa-3000.
Chris
Indeed SPA-3000 as a lot of features, maybe too many :-). My asterisk
is
The Grandstream HandyTone 488 has an FXO port.
I've never used it though.
Cheers,
Jon.
On Thursday 05 May 2005 07:07 am, Chris Mason (Lists) wrote:
Is the Sipura 3000 the only way to interface a remote pstn line and connect
incoming calls to Asterisk? I have a location connected by network
On Thu, 05 May 2005 12:33:50 -0600, Joseph wrote:
[snip]
Nothing really can touch the sipura's for features, ease of use, and
their very good documentation. Even if there was another product for
half the price I would probably still use the spa-3000.
Chris
Does anyone here have experience
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 12:33:50PM -0600, Joseph said:
The difference is that SPA-3000 answer the phone and rings asterisk (the
phone at this moment has been answered the ringing party is incurring
the charges before asterisk answered the phone), the AG-168 is ringing
the asterisk directly, so
Joseph wrote:
snip
The AG-168 supports IAX2 and the FXO port is pass though type.
The difference is that SPA-3000 answer the phone and rings asterisk (the
phone at this moment has been answered the ringing party is incurring
the charges before asterisk answered the phone), the AG-168 is ringing
- Original Message -
The Grandstream HandyTone 488 has an FXO port.
I've never used it though.
I could be wrong, but I seem to remember reading up on the HandyTone and
deciding that it doesn't really act like a true FXO, as in calls come in and
go straight to Asterisk like an FXO, and
The AG-168E has an FXO port?
The only seller I can find seems to think it is just a single FXS port.
http://www.iaxtalk.com/product_info.php?products_id=30
You wouldn't happen to have another link with more info would you?
Thanks,
Jon.
On Thursday 05 May 2005 01:33 pm, Joseph wrote:
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 16:51 -0500, Jon Gabrielson wrote:
The AG-168E has an FXO port?
The only seller I can find seems to think it is just a single FXS port.
http://www.iaxtalk.com/product_info.php?products_id=30
You wouldn't happen to have another link with more info would you?
Thanks,
On Thursday 05 May 2005 05:28 pm, Joseph wrote:
It has 1-FXS and one 1-Life Line (it is pass through type)
I've seen the pass-through term used alot and
I'm not quite for sure what that means. What is the
difference between a passthrough type and a regular
FXO. What can you do with one that
through on a FXS, but then I've only messed with ATA-186's recently.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Gabrielson
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 9:56 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 21:56 -0500, Jon Gabrielson wrote:
On Thursday 05 May 2005 05:28 pm, Joseph wrote:
It has 1-FXS and one 1-Life Line (it is pass through type)
I've seen the pass-through term used alot and
I'm not quite for sure what that means. What is the
difference between a
28 matches
Mail list logo
