I currently have an Asterisk running on an Alix 6B2 from PC Engines, but I am
having trouble using ztdummy as a timing device. The USB driver is OHCI, and
I believe ztdummy requires UHCI.
So, I am wondering if there is a way to use a Kernel tick and ztdummy on
FreeBSD, like it is possible on L
Hello
Since the Ports collection showed that there were more recent
versions of Asterisk and Zaptel, I tried to compile/install Zaptel,
but it fails, even after stopping Zaptel cleanly, and even after
stopping Asterisk itself, so I decided to just reboot.
Now, when I type "ztcfg -vv", I l
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:44:28 +0200, Vincent
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I updated the Ports collection to compile the latest Asterisk, but
>after running "make config", "make" just returns without doing
>anything:
For those having the same problem: "make clean ; make config ; make ;
make de
Hello
I updated the Ports collection to compile the latest Asterisk, but
after running "make config", "make" just returns without doing
anything:
=
# pkg_version -v | grep asterisk
asterisk-1.4.20.1_1 < needs updating (port has
1.4.21.2_3)
^C
# cd /usr/ports
On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:47:58 -0600, Anthony Francis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If Asterisk is running that will happen. Make sure to shutdown asterisk
>cleanly before doing that.
Sorry, forgot to say that I couldn't restart or stop/start Asterisk:
[Sep 6 19:06:17] WARNING[23110]: chan_zap.c:41
If Asterisk is running that will happen. Make sure to shutdown asterisk
cleanly before doing that.
Anthony
Vincent wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm running Asterisk 1.4.20.1 on a FreeBSD that I compiled from the
> Ports collection.
>
> It's the second time I'm having an issue with a FXO card and/or
Hello
I'm running Asterisk 1.4.20.1 on a FreeBSD that I compiled from the
Ports collection.
It's the second time I'm having an issue with a FXO card and/or the
Zaptel driver. I couldn't figure out what else to do, so I just
rebooted the server, but I'd like to know what happened, and whet
Vincent wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm running Asterisk 1.4.20.1 on a FreeBSD 6.3 host, and unless I'm
> mistaken, it seems like /usr/local/etc/rc.d/asterisk script doesn't
> make use of /usr/local/sbin/safe_asterisk to restart Asterisk in case
> it crashes.
>
> Is this correct, and if yes, why not
Hello
I'm running Asterisk 1.4.20.1 on a FreeBSD 6.3 host, and unless I'm
mistaken, it seems like /usr/local/etc/rc.d/asterisk script doesn't
make use of /usr/local/sbin/safe_asterisk to restart Asterisk in case
it crashes.
Is this correct, and if yes, why not use it?
Thank you.
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:36:27 +0200, Vincent
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Will do, although it could be a problem in the Zaptel code, which is
>not written by the mfg. Thanks.
I also notice that I can't restart the driver:
# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/zaptel restart
zaptelkldunload: can't unload file: De
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:47:04 -0500, Tilghman Lesher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Please call the reseller from which you bought the card or the manufacturer
>for support.
Will do, although it could be a problem in the Zaptel code, which is
not written by the mfg. Thanks.
_
On Wednesday 18 June 2008 11:21:07 Vincent wrote:
> The hardware is an OpenVox PCI card with a single FXO module. I know,
> it's not a $200 Sangoma, but then, we only get a few calls/day.
Please call the reseller from which you bought the card or the manufacturer
for support.
--
Tilghman
__
Hello
This PC had been running a Ports-compiled Asterisk 1.4.16.x
succesfully for almost three months, but this morning, although
Asterisk itself seemed fined, the Zaptel interface stopped taking
calls.
Stopping/restarting Zaptel using /usr/local/etc/rc.d/zaptel stop-start
didn't let thin
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 10:20:38 +0100, Vincent
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-pointer-sign"
>*** Error code 1
I wonder if maybe the people who ported Asterisk to FreeBSD aren't
using a more recent version of GCC than what's available in the 6.2
ports:
Hello
I'm trying to build the Zaptel ports on FreeBSD, but it fails:
==
# cd /usr/ports/misc/zaptel/
# make install
===> Building for zaptel-1.4.6_3
make -C zaptel all
Warning: Object directory not changed from original
/usr/ports/misc/zaptel/work/zaptel-bsd-1.4.6/zaptel
cc -O2 -fno-str
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:57:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi everyone:
>
> I'm trying to compile Asterisk on FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE and I'm getting the
> following error:
>
> cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Iinc
Hi everyone:
I'm trying to compile Asterisk on FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE and I'm getting the
following error:
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Iinclude -I../include
-D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DMAKE_VALGRIND_HAPPY -I/usr/local/i
Kim Culhan wrote:
Was running the Digium FreeBSD g.729 codec until recently when the latest
Asterisk bits were obtained via svn:
svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk asterisk
MAYBE it is the same problem:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2006-April/147577.html
Greetings-
Was running the Digium FreeBSD g.729 codec until recently when the latest
Asterisk bits were obtained via svn:
svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk asterisk
This produced:
Checked out revision 30652
This on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
Attempting to start asterisk it retur
Hi, I have also failed the same point. Mine is 5.4-Stable Jul 16, did make
world from 5.3 which works * 1.0.6(?) ports and I did cvsup ports-supfile
again several minutes ago. NG.
--
Zen
>
> Darren Wiebe wrote >
> >>Did you do a "make clean"? I just, as in 1 hour ago, successfully
> >>installe
Ask this question on asterisk-bsd
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Towards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 4:38 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD 5.4 (Asterisk 1.0.9) - Playback ,MP3Player
and Musiconhold not working
I installed A
I installed Asterisk 1.0.9 in a Freebsd 5.4 ( with no zaptel card); I
have 2 zoom x5v and works great ( in extensions 123 and 321 ) but I
was trying to test cmd Playback, MusicOnHold, MP3Player but when I
call to extension 100 I don't hear the sound ( mp3 or gsm that I put)
, I only hear noise
If I
Darren Wiebe wrote >
>>Did you do a "make clean"? I just, as in 1 hour ago, successfully
>>installed 1.0.9 using the port on FreeBSD.
Yeah, even deleted all the files in the asterisk ports , and refreshed it
ports collection. Always fails to compile at this point.
Am I missing a package depen
Did you do a "make clean"? I just, as in 1 hour ago, successfully
installed 1.0.9 using the port on FreeBSD.
Darren Wiebe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Ackroyd wrote:
Hiya,
I was just updating Asterisk to 1.0.9 on FreeBSD 5.4, using the new ports
updates. The port won't compile I just get this.
c
Hiya,
I was just updating Asterisk to 1.0.9 on FreeBSD 5.4, using the new ports
updates. The port won't compile I just get this.
chan_zap.c: In function `pri_dchannel':
chan_zap.c:8391: error: structure has no member named `cause'
chan_zap.c:8886: error: structure has no member named `inband_prog
All,
I am from Brazil, and I am no finding the Digium boards to sell here.
I am currently using FreeBSD 5.3 to run asterisk. Digium cards could be
used with this OS ?
How is possible to use a generic modem (like INTEL MD3200) with FreeBSD
5.3? It has the total supported drivers for it ? Does som
On 18/11/2004 17:25 kido noagbodji said the following:
I just purchased 10 G729 licenses for my asterisk box from Digium I was able
to register the key. But when i start asterisk it fails with the error
message:
[codec_g729a.so]Nov 18 09:27:01 WARNING[135073792]: loader.c:248
ast_load_resou
Hi all,
I think there is no asterisk-addons version
for freebsd. Am I right? I tried to compile the standard version but I couldn't
do it on FreeBSD, may be the idea is as crazy as try to install asterisk
for linux on freebsd!
___
Asterisk-Users
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 03:27:40AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just purchased 10 G729 licenses for my asterisk box from Digium I was able
> to register the key. But when i start asterisk it fails with the error
> message:
> [codec_g729a.so]Nov 18 09:27:01 WARNING[135073792]: loader.
Hello,
I just purchased 10 G729 licenses for my asterisk box from Digium I was able
to register the key. But when i start asterisk it fails with the error
message:
[codec_g729a.so]Nov 18 09:27:01 WARNING[135073792]: loader.c:248
ast_load_resource: Shared object "libc.so.6" not found
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:35:32 -, Victor Alvarez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Trying to configure a voicemail system on FreeBSD 4.10 + asterisk 0.9.0, I
> found the following problems:
Download the latest asterisk versions from cvs (try a make update in
the asterisk src directory
Hi,
Trying to configure a voicemail system on
FreeBSD 4.10 + asterisk 0.9.0, I found the following
problems:
1. When I try to launch VoicemailMain from
IAX Softphone (IAXComm), asterisk generates a Segmentation fault (core dumped)
and obviosly all the system went down. It doesn't happ
On 07/11/2004 21:06 Richard Airlie said the following:
I had been running asterisk-0.9 with zaptel 0.7 with no problems (both
built from FreeBSD ports). Yesterday I cvsup'd my ports tree and build
asterisk 1.0.1_1 and zaptel 0.8_1, which seemed to work except that
any attempt to play music on hold
Hello List,
I seem to have a reoccuring problem trying to find the right version
of the zaptel drivers to run with asterisk under FreeBSD.
I had been running asterisk-0.9 with zaptel 0.7 with no problems (both
built from FreeBSD ports). Yesterday I cvsup'd my ports tree and build
asterisk 1.0.1_1
Can I use the clone Card.
Generic
X100P
Intel IA92 WinModem compatible with X100P. This is
the so-called "clone" X100P. No technical support is available for this product.
To a FreeBSD Station white the
FreeBSD Zaptel drivers.
Peter
__
On 21/09/2004 20:20 Jan Baggen said the following:
Compiled Asterisk from FreeBSD port (0.9.0_2)
When I start asterisk it uses 100% cpu. Searches on Google
say to comment the noload => chan_oss.so in modules.conf
But this is already commented. Make.conf contains some
optimizations.
add 'noload =
Compiled Asterisk from FreeBSD port (0.9.0_2)
When I start asterisk it uses 100% cpu. Searches on Google
say to comment the noload => chan_oss.so in modules.conf
But this is already commented. Make.conf contains some
optimizations.
modules.conf:
; Asterisk configuration file
;
; Module Loader
hey asterisk folk,
i'm new to asterisk, but not to freebsd as i've been using it and
developing on it for quite a few years. we're planning on deploying
asterisk as part of a voip provider's service platform and naturally i'd
rather be using freebsd instead of a linux based distro. as such, i am
ve
The status of the FreeBSD port of Asterisk
Changes this week:
Rich Nesse fixed compilation of app_intercom
and chan_oss. A solution to bug 1411,
recursive lock inititalization, was submitted
that seems to be stable on FreeBSD 5.2.1 in
terms of up-time. Libpri builds on FreeBSD
as well now.
Max
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001411
We have a coder that are eagerly waiting for response and advice on how to
*finally* solve the problem with recursive mutexes on FreeBSD. If you are
running FreeBSD and know this kind of coding - log in to bugs and add
your comment while he's
Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Stenton
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD + Zaptel + Asterisk
>
>
>
> port misc/zaptel
&
port misc/zaptel
In our last exciting episode, Tom (UnitedLayer) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Yes, the driver in the ports tree for the digium card works!
> I'd heard reports that it crashes the box/etc, but I have yet to encounter
> that.
What is the name of the port? I don't see it and I refr
/usr/ports/misc/zaptel
--
Arnold Cavazos, Jr. abcjr at abcjr . net
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 10:06:00AM -0500, Jason T. Nelson wrote:
> In our last exciting episode, Tom (UnitedLayer) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Yes, the driver in the ports tree for the digium card works!
> > I'd he
In our last exciting episode, Tom (UnitedLayer) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Yes, the driver in the ports tree for the digium card works!
> I'd heard reports that it crashes the box/etc, but I have yet to encounter
> that.
What is the name of the port? I don't see it and I refresh my ports tree
on
I've been lurking on the list for quite a while now, and I hadn't seen
much from people using FreeBSD, so I figured I'd post something.
Yes, the driver in the ports tree for the digium card works!
I'd heard reports that it crashes the box/etc, but I have yet to encounter
that.
I've had all the fu
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:38:32AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> > make install -DNO_IGNORE
>
> h, scary considering i don't need h323. or am i misunderstanding
> something?
NO_IGNORE is going to bypass all of the forbidden lines for all of
the dependencies
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
[EMAIL PRO
> make install -DNO_IGNORE
h, scary considering i don't need h323. or am i misunderstanding
something?
> I'm also working on a freebsd port that uses the cvs version of
> asterisk, let me know if you're interested in taking a look.
o! but i am about to go back on the road. so i d
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 04:56:46PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> the freebsd port tree version is dead because of the openh323
> issues. before i start hacking, i am hoping someone else has
> a freebsd version that will build on -current. and i do not
> care about h232.
>
> dare i hope?
>
> randy
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 04:56:46PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> the freebsd port tree version is dead because of the openh323
> issues. before i start hacking, i am hoping someone else has
> a freebsd version that will build on -current. and i do not
> care about h232.
Just comment out the line wi
the freebsd port tree version is dead because of the openh323
issues. before i start hacking, i am hoping someone else has
a freebsd version that will build on -current. and i do not
care about h232.
dare i hope?
randy
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Andrew Thompson wrote:
David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
In our FreeBSD port of Asterisk, we have a lot of local patches and I
was wondering if it were possible to get some of them merged into the
Asterisk source base.
Thanks
You need to ask on asterisk-dev, not asterisk-users.
My guess would be brea
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 03:08:10PM -0400, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> > In our FreeBSD port of Asterisk, we have a lot of local patches and I
> > was wondering if it were possible to get some of them merged into the
> > Asterisk source base.
> >
> > Thanks
>
> You need
David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> In our FreeBSD port of Asterisk, we have a lot of local patches and I
> was wondering if it were possible to get some of them merged into the
> Asterisk source base.
>
> Thanks
You need to ask on asterisk-dev, not asterisk-users.
My guess would be break them down to
In our FreeBSD port of Asterisk, we have a lot of local patches and I
was wondering if it were possible to get some of them merged into the
Asterisk source base.
Thanks
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree Network Services, Inc.
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol wrote:
> > > Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working Wildcard
> > > drivers for Free/Net/Open BSD. Care to write them?
>
> On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:33, James Moran wrote:
> > Dam w
> On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol wrote:
> > Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working Wildcard
> > drivers for Free/Net/Open BSD. Care to write them?
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:33, James Moran wrote:
> Dam wish I was that good to do that.
You can pitch into th
On 2004 Mar 29, at 20:54, Chris Albertson wrote:
One other on-line resource: http://zapatatelephony.org/
The _original_ driver was for BSD. The folks at Digium
apparently ported it to Linux and likely improved it over
time. But the old BSD driver is still there.
Apparently.
http://lists.digiu
a Colp.
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "James Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:46 PM
> >Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
> >
> >
> >> Does
ua Colp.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "James Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:46 PM
>Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
>
>
>> Does any of the hardware work with FreeBSD??
>> On Mon
*cough* not a thing.
- Joshua Colp.
- Original Message -
From: "James Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:46 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
> Does any of the hardware work with FreeBSD??
> On Mon, 2
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Moran
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 6:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
>
> Do any of the Wildcards work with FreeBSD??
>
> ___
>
PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Moran
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 6:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
>
> Do any of the Wildcards work with FreeBSD??
>
> ___
> Asteri
]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
Do any of the Wildcards work with FreeBSD??
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com
Do any of the Wildcards work with FreeBSD??
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Joe Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (Article converted from unnecessary HTML to nice plain text.)
>
> But I thought asterisk was just a console application, with no need for
> XWindows at all. Or is it on hold due to the GUI controlling mechanisms?
>
You don't have to run Asterisk from the cons
: "Joe Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 9:30 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Segmentation Fault on start up
To all;
I've got two installations of asterisk. The last one (installed a few
days ago) is from
After the last FreeBSD-hostile response from someone on the list, I was
wondering about something someone else said a few weeks ago: that something
of the magnitude of a *real* Asterisk under FreeBSD project would probably
require its own mailing list (and perhaps its own project website). Has
any
On Thursday 25 March 2004 15:30, Joe Lewis wrote:
> I've got two installations of asterisk. The last one (installed a
> few days ago) is from the FreeBSD ports, and many thanks, because
> it compiled BEAUTIFULLY! However, I can't run it. Everytime I
> start asterisk, I get a segmentation fault.
Currently the asterisk port is blocked due to vulnerabilities in pwlib.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 9:30 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Segmentation Fault on start u
To all;
I've got two installations of asterisk. The last one (installed a few
days ago) is from the FreeBSD ports, and many thanks, because it
compiled BEAUTIFULLY! However, I can't run it. Everytime I start
asterisk, I get a segmentation fault. "asterisk -c" reveals :
[...snip...]
[co
ulaski Networks
http://www.psknet.com
866.477.5638
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Christopher Arnold
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 7:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] freeBS
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Michael Rowley wrote:
> Does anyone have any information on the zaptel driver under freeBSD? I
> know that there has been a 1200$ bounty posted, but wasn't sure if
> anyone with any talent has taken up the project. (I don't really have
> any talent... :| )
>
We have peopl
On Sunday 29 February 2004 20:13, Michael Rowley wrote:
> Does anyone have any information on the zaptel driver under
> freeBSD? I know that there has been a 1200$ bounty posted, but
> wasn't sure if anyone with any talent has taken up the project. (I
> don't really have any talent... :| )
If t
Hello,
Does anyone have any information on the zaptel driver under freeBSD? I
know that there has been a 1200$ bounty posted, but wasn't sure if
anyone with any talent has taken up the project. (I don't really have
any talent... :| )
Michael
___
Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
I am trying to get Asterisk to compile on FreeBSD 4.8. Per bug 389, BSD
support should be in CVS. I have also tried applying the patch in bug
374, but always get these messages:
click# make
"Makefile", line 21: Missing dependency operator
"Makefile", line 23: Need an operat
It looks like my conversion of the STUN server to a GNU Autotools
build system will go into Vovida.org's CVS system soon. My next
task will be to do the same for Asterisk. Third task is to get
Asterisk to use STUN.
Back to BSD: I think GNU Autotools is the right way to fix this.
But until t
I haven't looked @ Frrebsd support, but possibly using gmake will fix
the problem pfor you?
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 03:29:58AM -0500, Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
> I am trying to get Asterisk to compile on FreeBSD 4.8. Per bug 389, BSD
> support should be in CVS. I have also tried applying the patch i
Not sure if it matters or not, but have you tried gmake?
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 19:29, Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
> I am trying to get Asterisk to compile on FreeBSD 4.8. Per bug 389, BSD
> support should be in CVS. I have also tried applying the patch in bug
> 374, but always get these messages:
>
I am trying to get Asterisk to compile on FreeBSD 4.8. Per bug 389, BSD
support should be in CVS. I have also tried applying the patch in bug
374, but always get these messages:
click# make
"Makefile", line 21: Missing dependency operator
"Makefile", line 23: Need an operator
"Makefile", line 72:
Alex Ayala wrote:
I was wondering if anyone knows if Asterisk works in FreeBSD? I heard
the problem was that the digium cards weren’t supported in FreeBSD.
Thanks,
Alex
AFAIK, Asterisk can be made to compile and run but as you mentioned I
think the problem is drivers..
__
I was wondering if anyone knows if
Asterisk works in FreeBSD? I heard the problem was
that the digium cards weren’t supported in FreeBSD.
Thanks,
Alex
Since no one yet has objected to this proposal, could you all move on
from discussing if it should happen, and toward doing something. In the
long run it shouldn't be that big of a deal to make the few changes
necessary. Also if someone jumps in and gets the autoconf started, I'm
sure Mark will be
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Alastair Maw wrote:
> I keep meaning to sort out autoconf/automake stuff for Asterisk. I
> notice that Asterisk is GPLed, so there won't be any licensing issues.
> I'm quite surprised no one else has got round to it before.
>
> Anyway, I have no time at the moment for this, but
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 05:02 am, Alastair Maw wrote:
> denon wrote:
> > With regards to Asterisk on FBSD, I for one would love to see it
> > happen. I prefer FreeBSD over Linux in almost every case.
> >
> > However, personally I have a few concerns:
> >
> > Namely, the primary developer is
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 07:53 am, Jim Mercer wrote:
> any excentricities the SCO-linux people add to the code can usually
> be ifdef'd back to normality. 8^)
Try the one in acl.c, referencing /proc/net/route. To do the
analogous on FreeBSD, you have to parse kernel internal structures.
Th
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
> i've not done an autoconf before, and i suspect it will require not a small
> amount of tweaking.
>
> i suspect the BSD patches will head in the direction of a number of those
> tweaks.
Some of the "patches" that get applied in the normal /usr/ports tree u
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 11:02:59AM +0100, Alastair Maw wrote:
> As importantly, we'll get cross-unix portability for less effort. There
> won't be a *BSD port - the autoconf stuff will sort it all out for you.
> Of course, we'll have to do some work to make sure it all functions
> properly, but
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 06:13:02PM -0500, denon wrote:
> With regards to Asterisk on FBSD, I for one would love to see it happen. I
> prefer FreeBSD over Linux in almost every case.
>
> However, personally I have a few concerns:
>
> Namely, the primary developer is a Linux nut .. (sorry Mark, I
denon wrote:
With regards to Asterisk on FBSD, I for one would love to see it
happen. I prefer FreeBSD over Linux in almost every case.
However, personally I have a few concerns:
Namely, the primary developer is a Linux nut .. (sorry Mark, I mean that
in a good way :). I'd hate to see develop
> another. I mean, by the time you strip down the linux install to make it
> rock-stable, it's basically a kernel, compiler, and a handful of
> dependances. Does it really matter what OS it runs on at this point, as
> long as it's a robust kernel?
At least in my case, I /can/ strip down a FreeBS
I agree 100%. Sometimes code works on one system
because of a "quirk". Building and testing on
multiple systems and debugging the autoconf scripts
has a way of making the code mature and robust. I
keep and old DEC Alpha (a 64 bit machine) and SPARC
(big endian byte order) and run Solaris and Li
With regards to Asterisk on FBSD, I for one would love to see it happen. I
prefer FreeBSD over Linux in almost every case.
However, personally I have a few concerns:
Namely, the primary developer is a Linux nut .. (sorry Mark, I mean that in
a good way :). I'd hate to see development efforts
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, denon wrote:
> I'd hate to see development efforts get split up, and more time spent on
> porting/etc efforts, detracting from primary development. If it's now
> slowing down new development, it's always a step behind while someone
> patches up the current builds.
Once the cod
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
> > Can we bribe you? :)
>
> sure, pay my rent for 3 months and give me a 50" plasma TV to play in the
> background.
Is that all? That sounds rather cheap, compared to the things direction
that I'd have to go if I wanted to stick to the cisci CM route, with
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
> > Can we bribe you? :)
>
> sure, pay my rent for 3 months and give me a 50" plasma TV to play in the
> background.
Hrm, thats a bit steep for me.
How about 1.5 months, and a goat with fleas?
___
Asterisk-Users mai
project are the current
drivers for the Digium products? I think that I read on that site that the
original drivers were for FreeBSD.
Sean
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Mercer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:05 PM
Subjec
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:49:45PM -0700, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
> > however, my real job keeps getting in the way. 8^(
> >
> > if i manage to get it going, then it becomes part of my real job, and things
> > will move more quickly.
>
> Can we bribe you?
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:50:07PM +0100, Fearghas McKay wrote:
> At 12:49 -0700 8/9/03, David Raistrick wrote:
> >I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the
> >plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need
> >of the hardware side. I'd u
At 12:49 -0700 8/9/03, David Raistrick wrote:
>I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the
>plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need
>of the hardware side. I'd use VIC cards in my existing ciscos to
>interface to the land lines, for
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
> > I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the
> > plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need
> > of the hardware side. I'd use VIC cards in my existing ciscos to
> > interface to the land lines,
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
