Matt Riddell wrote:
Chee Foong wrote:
i guess may be it's a 64bit variable. so you can only use 0-63.
LOL
Bits work like this
[128][64][32][16][8][4][2][1]
So, you have a whole lot of bits, each one moving from right to left inceases
a power of 2. Say you wanted to represent 1
Chee Foong wrote:
> i guess may be it's a 64bit variable. so you can only use 0-63.
LOL
Bits work like this
[128][64][32][16][8][4][2][1]
So, you have a whole lot of bits, each one moving from right to left inceases
a power of 2. Say you wanted to represent 10, then you would turn on the 8
i guess may be it's a 64bit variable. so you can only use 0-63.
CCF
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of René
Mayorga
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 15:56
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Hosted PBX (vPBX
Why don't you try this:
http://pbxfreeware.com/app_intercept.c
On 9/7/05, René Mayorga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> Can you give me any hint on with file of the source you modify that
> Value???
>
> tnx
>
> On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 08:18 -0400, Flobi wrote:
> > I'm not sure about why, but it's
Hi
Can you give me any hint on with file of the source you modify that
Value???
tnx
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 08:18 -0400, Flobi wrote:
> I'm not sure about why, but it's it is hardcoded into asterisk. Back
> when it was a limit of 31, I searched around and increased the value
> on my box and recomp
I'm not sure about why, but it's it is hardcoded into asterisk. Back
when it was a limit of 31, I searched around and increased the value
on my box and recompiled. It did not seem to adversely affect the
system.
On 9/7/05, René Mayorga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm working with this iss
Hi,
I'm working with this issue for a while, Now I already solve the
dialplan issues, but I still have a question about the Callgroups,
I read at www.voip-info.org that , there is a 63 limit of callgroups.
And I'm wondering why?? and if the 1.2.0beta version supported more than
63 Groups?? (I did'n
