> >> If nic is loaded using modprobe - you can set options for duplex -
> >> depending on the nic...
> >> See /etc/modules.conf
> >
> > I assume you really meant /etc/modprobe.conf ;)
>
> Rich, he really means /etc/modules.conf. He is using 2.4 kernel.
> I know, because the reverse happened to m
If nic is loaded using modprobe - you can set options for duplex -
depending on the nic...
See /etc/modules.conf
I assume you really meant /etc/modprobe.conf ;)
Rich, he really means /etc/modules.conf. He is using 2.4 kernel.
I know, because the reverse happened to me :), see this:
http://lis
> If nic is loaded using modprobe - you can set options for duplex -
> depending on the nic...
> See /etc/modules.conf
I assume you really meant /etc/modprobe.conf ;)
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > > > For an asterisk server _always_ statically define the
> > duplex setting
> > > >
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 Softphone Quality & Network Cards
>
>
> > > For an asterisk server _always_ statically define the
> duplex setting
> > > on both the switch and the nic card. On sip
> > For an asterisk server _always_ statically define the duplex setting
> > on both the switch and the nic card. On sip phones and workstations,
>
> Can you give an example of how to check the duplex setting and statically
> define it for, say, RedHat9
Multiple ways... try 'dmesg | grep duplex
For an asterisk server _always_ statically define the duplex setting
on both the switch and the nic card. On sip phones and workstations,
Can you give an example of how to check the duplex setting and statically
define it for, say, RedHat9
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Rich Adamson wrote:
Everythi
> Everything is set to autoneg, NICs, switches and router
>
To ensure reasonable performance, key devices (eg, routers, servers)
should _always_ have duplex settings statically defined. Speed is
less of an issue as the 10/100 negotiation is hard to get wrong.
Part of the duplex negotiation pro
ge-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julio
Arruda
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:43 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 Softphone Quality & Network Cards
Matt Riddell wrote:
Adam Robins wrote:
Softphone Quality & Network Cards
Matt Riddell wrote:
>Adam Robins wrote:
>
>
>>Should it be in half duplex or full duplex?
>>
>>
>Full.
>
AFAIK, depends...
If you have your switches doing autonegotiation, you can't disable
autoneg in the NIC and hard
Matt Riddell wrote:
Adam Robins wrote:
Should it be in half duplex or full duplex?
Full.
AFAIK, depends...
If you have your switches doing autonegotiation, you can't disable
autoneg in the NIC and hardcode it to do 100/Full-duplex, or you WILL
have a duplex mismatch.
This is as pe
Adam Robins wrote:
> Should it be in half duplex or full duplex?
Full.
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
___
http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
Should it be in half duplex or full duplex?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Riddell
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 11:28 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 Softphone
Adam Robins wrote:
> We are in the process of an Asterisk call center deployment using IAX2
> G711 ulaw softphones. Outbound sound quality is terrible.
Check if the network card is in half duplex mode.
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
___
http://www.sinea
Hi!
> We are in the process of an Asterisk call center deployment using IAX2
> G711 ulaw softphones. Outbound sound quality is terrible.
Have you tried a different sound card and/or a USB handset (which
includes an external sound card)? And what exactly do you mean with
"terrible sound"?
P
I have had uniformly bad experiences with soft phones when there are network
issues. Hardware phones seem to work much better if there are network problems.
For example, I have been able to make fine calls over a wireless link I use
with a cisco 7960, but NO softphone works over the same link.
Yo
Bill McCready (PCPhoneline.com) wrote:
> If you have any questions, please private e-mail me. Thanks !!!
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Bill McCready
> PCPhoneline.com
This is spam. Post it to the Asterisk-Biz list. This list is for
"Non-Commercial Discussion" of Asterisk.
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddel
Hi!
We are in the process of an Asterisk call center deployment using IAX2
G711 ulaw softphones. Outbound sound quality is terrible.
RESPONSE: This is Bill McCready from PCPhoneline.com . To address your
sound quality issues, you may want to check out our VTA1000 Skype+SIP+IAX2
Tri-Mode Ga
tourn of AGC , and mybe use GSM.
for usb device that use iax2 prtocol there are this one that have nice
http://www.gedameurope.com/us/002servizi_e_prodotti%5Bus%5D.htm
this usb device doe not need external sound card.
Philipp von Klitzing wrote:
Hi!
We are in the process of an Asterisk c
AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 Softphone Quality & Network Cards
Hi!
> We are in the process of an Asterisk call center deployment using IAX2
> G711 ulaw softphones. Outbound sound quality is terrible.
Have y
rcial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 Softphone Quality & Network Cards
I haven't had similiar experience, but in several threads about sound
quality people have talked about Network cards being the culprit. In
particular, a few people have commented all sorts of problems on
I haven't had similiar experience, but in several threads about sound
quality people have talked about Network cards being the culprit. In
particular, a few people have commented all sorts of problems on
onboard NIC's, since they tend to be of lesser quality than
stand-alone NICS.
On 8/26/05, Adam
We are in the process of an Asterisk call center deployment using IAX2
G711 ulaw softphones. Outbound sound quality is terrible.
This week we rebuilt the entire LAN with Cisco 2950-EI switches and have
employed QoS on the switches and router. Still sounds terrible.
What we are now finding is
22 matches
Mail list logo
