Is anyone other than me having trouble dialing out via IAXTEL? I havn't
changed my config files in weeks but seems that IAXTel calls (800 and FWD)
stopped working in the past week sometime.
Robert
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:/
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: "rnc Info Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 2:45 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IaxTel seems down
> Is anyone other than me having trouble dialing out via IAXTEL? I havn'
> Is anyone other than me having trouble dialing out via IAXTEL? I havn't
> changed my config files in weeks but seems that IAXTel calls (800 and FWD)
> stopped working in the past week sometime.
Yes, I've been having problems as well but had not taken the time to diagnose
the problem. Just did s
>
> Yes, I've been having problems as well but had not taken the time to
> diagnose
> the problem. Just did some looking and it appears iaxtel.com has removed
> the iax v1 support. iax2 seems to be working fine.
>
Rich,
That solved the outbound problem.. Thanks for the hint... 800 numbers are
acces
To add to this problem, we have been fighting a denial of service
attack on the toll-free gateways. We have installed new code to deal
with this problem hopefully. I will never understand why someone would
attack a free service.
John Lodden
Telesthetic
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 07:45, rnc Info Li
John,
Did you shut down iax v1 (udp/5036) on purpose, or are we all suppose to
change to iax2 (udp/4569) forever?
Rich
> To add to this problem, we have been fighting a denial of service
> attack on the toll-free gateways. We have installed new code to deal
> with this
Rich Adamson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 07:45, rnc Info Lists wrote:
Is anyone other than me having trouble dialing out via IAXTEL? I havn't
changed my config files in weeks but seems that IAXTel calls (800 and FWD)
stopped working in the past week sometime.
To add to this problem, we have
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 12:36, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> >>
>
> I seem to get a G729 codec on calling 1800 numbers on IAXTEL...
> Temporary fault or do we have to buy a license?
> /O
The toll-free gateways allows the use of G729, if you don't have that
CODEC don't show you can use it. The gateways
) 857-3287
IAXTEL (700) 857-3287
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Lodden
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IaxTel seems down
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 12:36
The FWD bridge is currently down, as I am looking to try to find someone
else to host the IAX2 to SIP gateway so that iaxtel can remain strictly
IAX2.
Mark
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster
> I cannot connect to IAX1 either
We are phasing out support for IAX1. Are the people who still *need*
IAX1?
Mark
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Mark,
> > I cannot connect to IAX1 either
>
> We are phasing out support for IAX1. Are the people who still *need*
> IAX1?
Given that iax2 has been around and stable for a rather lengthy period,
I would doubt there is any real need for it other then to coordinate production
systems that "can't"
> Would have probably been more appropriate to at least announce that
> iax was going to disappear at some specific date, as opposed to folks
> randomly discoverying it and chasing problems. (Kind of related to why
> there isn't a marketing plan.)
Sorry, it was something of a side effect of some a
> > Would have probably been more appropriate to at least announce that
> > iax was going to disappear at some specific date, as opposed to folks
> > randomly discoverying it and chasing problems. (Kind of related to why
> > there isn't a marketing plan.)
>
> Sorry, it was something of a side effe
> Good, glad to hear things are better. Without getting into too much techie
> detail, what was the root problem?
There was just race that I introduced a while back. If calls came in
while a reload was taking place in IAX2, bad things would happen. Now
it's fixed. Originally I was thinking it h
On Sunday 07 of December 2003 21:14, Mark Spencer wrote:
> > Good, glad to hear things are better. Without getting into too much
> > techie detail, what was the root problem?
>
> There was just race that I introduced a while back. If calls came in
> while a reload was taking place in IAX2, bad thi
16 matches
Mail list logo
