[Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-21 Thread woody+asterisk
Has anyone from digium looked at why there is a 30 min to 3 hour lag on messages on this list? I.e looking at the last 50 messages I've received, the lag is about 90 minutes between the time sent and the time received. Sometimes this drops to as little as 4 minutes. Is this problem worse for me

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-21 Thread mattf
digium.com) is running Debian MATT--- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 7:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag Has anyone from digium looked at why there is a 30 min to 3 hour lag on m

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-22 Thread Steve Foy
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 7:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag > > > Has anyone from digium looked at why there is a 30 min to 3 hour lag on > messages on this list? > > I.e looking at the last 50 mes

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-22 Thread Steve Foy
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 08:39:09AM +, Steve Foy wrote: > I'd be willing to host the list, I guess it just depends on how many > emails/day the Asterisk list goes through... Seems to be around 1200 emails per week, for the one week that I counted anyway... -- Steve Foy| http://www.un

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-22 Thread Christian Hoffmeyer
- Original Message - From: "Steve Foy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk-Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 3:18 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag > On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 08:39:09AM +, Steve Foy wrote: >

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-22 Thread WipeOut
Christian Hoffmeyer wrote: - Original Message - From: "Steve Foy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk-Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 3:18 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 08:39:09AM

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-22 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Thursday 22 January 2004 14:04, WipeOut wrote: > Christian Hoffmeyer wrote: > >- Original Message - > > From: "Steve Foy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: "Asterisk-Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Thursday, January 22,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-22 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! > 900 mails / 150 per day = 6 Subscribers.. > Is the Asterisk community anywhere near that big?? There is more than just one list on that MLM, and you'll probably have to count in adminstrative messages (?) and maybe even error messages. Still that would reveal a huge number of subs

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-22 Thread Chris Albertson
Maybe the words "nine million" was not ment to be taken literally. What if he said "about a gazillion" Then we'd all be arguing if "gazillion" == 1x10^14 or 1x10^16 Have you ever set up "mailman" on a Linux system? 9,000,000 would be a real trick setup not something you'd do with a standard PC

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-23 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! > There are 60*60*24 seconds in a day 9E6 per messages/day > means a little over 100 messages per second sustained 24x7. > I really doubt it. I know little to nothing about mailman, but this is where "smart" smtp engines (esmtp?) and tools like LISTSERV come in that do everything they ca

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-23 Thread Michael Welter
Why doesn't someone just ask Markster how many are on the list? Inquiring minds want to know... Chris Albertson wrote: Maybe the words "nine million" was not ment to be taken literally. What if he said "about a gazillion" Then we'd all be arguing if "gazillion" == 1x10^14 or 1x10^16 Have you e

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-23 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
> Have you ever set up "mailman" on a Linux system? 9,000,000 > would be a real trick setup not something you'd do with a > standard PC. You have a rack full of mail servers, raid disks > and the works. Lets do some math: > There are 60*60*24 seconds in a day 9E6 per messages/day > means a li

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-28 Thread Steve Foy
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:44:52AM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Has anyone from digium looked at why there is a 30 min to 3 hour lag on > messages on this list? Continuing this... I sent a message (Subject: Zapateller) yesterday at 17:54 GMT and it only came through to my box today at 08:28

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-28 Thread Brian West
Steve, I have been working most of the day to get this problem solved. Thus far everything should be returning to normal and problems like this should never happen again. Right now it has about 3 hours of posts to get out and some were lost by accident during this mess. So if you see a po

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag

2004-01-29 Thread mattf
9:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing List Lag Steve, I have been working most of the day to get this problem solved. Thus far everything should be returning to normal and problems like this should never happen again. Right now it has

[Asterisk-Users] Mailing list lag again

2004-02-16 Thread Reinhard Max
Hi, today's BRI thread showed, that the mailing list has a delay of about an hour again. Is this still due to the Digium relocation, or is something else going on with the list server? cu Reinhard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTE