On 05/03/2016 at 09:16 PM Joshua Colp wrote:
> Eric Wieling wrote:
>> I don't know the default setting for progressinband in the code, but it
>> is documented in Asterisk 11's sip.conf.sample as defaulting to never.
>> Maybe the docs were fixed since Asterisk 11.
>
> The behavior change to
Eric Wieling wrote:
I don't know the default setting for progressinband in the code, but it
is documented in Asterisk 11's sip.conf.sample as defaulting to never.
Maybe the docs were fixed since Asterisk 11.
The behavior change to actually do what the option was documented to do.
As part of
I don't know the default setting for progressinband in the code, but it
is documented in Asterisk 11's sip.conf.sample as defaulting to never.
Maybe the docs were fixed since Asterisk 11.
from 11.21.x sip.conf.sample:
;progressinband=never ; If we should generate in-band ringing
Whoops, email client auto-filled dev previously. Let's try this again.
Michael Maier wrote:
> Ok - but this doesn't seem to answer my main question:
>
> Why must
>
> progressinband=never
>
> be applied especially if asterisk uses it by default? The big difference
> between w/ and w/o it is:
On 05/03/2016 at 05:43 PM Joshua Colp wrote:
> Michael Maier wrote:
>> On 05/03/2016 at 04:50 PM Joshua Colp wrote:
>>> Michael Maier wrote:
Hello Joshua!
I attached the sip debug without the progressinband=never set. The
caller didn't get a ring back tone as expected.
>>>
Michael Maier wrote:
And:
The ringback tone wasn't missing, if the second number (the second
trunk) of the asterisk installation was used!
The only difference between those two trunks is: The first trunk is
configured to a ring group - the second trunk is configured directly to
an
Hello!
I migrated asterisk 11 to 13 as user of FreePBX 12.0.76.2.
As customer of German Telekom, I have three numbers and therefore three
trunks - each number is bound to one trunk.
After migration, some callers complained about missing ringback tone:
they didn't hear any ring tone and where
Hello All,
My asterisk installation has now been running for over two months
without a hitch, and I've decided it's time to move things around a bit.
It's currently installed on a 2.7GHz Celeron under RH9 installed on a
10GB leftover drive. Thanks to the strange marketing method called
1) should be more than enuf for 1 channel. I use a P2 400 here for
testing and it worked ok for transcoding besides the schedule notices.
2) Depending how much timing you need to do X100P or ztdummy could
even work just fine.
3. -head
4. i'd rebuild it from src and just copy your configs and
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Migrating Asterisk
2) Depending how much timing you need to do X100P or ztdummy
could even work just fine.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Jay Milk wrote:
Hello All,
My asterisk installation has now been running for over two months
without a hitch, and I've decided it's time to move things around a bit.
It's currently installed on a 2.7GHz Celeron under RH9 installed on a
10GB leftover drive. Thanks to
11 matches
Mail list logo
