Sorry, that last sentence I had put in there was a thought interupted by
my normal job. I meant for you to do the little research into adding the
context to the end of your switch statement, and if I was wrong then go
about the adding of users.
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 11:02, Eric Wieling wrote:
>
If you have to set up different users for the different contexts what'
the usefulness of having a /context on the switch => statement?
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 10:47, Steven Critchfield wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 10:36, Eric Wieling wrote:
> > I have a two remote PBXs. I use the switch => statem
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 10:36, Eric Wieling wrote:
> I have a two remote PBXs. I use the switch => statement on each PBX to
> point to the other PBX.
>
> Now I want extensions on PBX-1 to dial extensions and PSTN numbers that
> are local to PBX-2.
>
> However, I ALSO want people to be able to dial
I have a two remote PBXs. I use the switch => statement on each PBX to
point to the other PBX.
Now I want extensions on PBX-1 to dial extensions and PSTN numbers that
are local to PBX-2.
However, I ALSO want people to be able to dial into a Zap channel on
PBX-1 and be able to dial extensions on