>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/22/05 12:55PM >>>
> > I do understand that I would need to replace all of
> > my existing telephones with VoIP-capable
> > phones, and that I'll need to re-wire most of the
> > campus telephone infrastructure (it's still
> > all cat-3) -- these arent problems.
why do y
> I just want to be sure that it's possible to do this, and that im not wasting
> my time.
No time wasting. This is a great fit for you. Stay away from some of
the Dell servers until you know that they work well. (interupt and
ACPI issues)
--
Thanks for the advice on staying away from Dell ser
Leave what you have in place. Install Asterisk and investigate the
various line interface options. Enlist early adopters on your campus to
participate in the trial. Connect Asterisk to your existing system with
PRI. Gradually ramp up the Asterisk system and ramp down the existing
system.
Mi
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 03:56:55PM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote:
> He is talking about ZAP channels. This is correct. No one should want
> to use that many ZAP channels.
You can use more than 250 zap channels. That limitation has been removed
a long time ago. chan_zap.c doesn't have to use the dev
Correction 250 Zap channels.
Don this is not an issue for you.
On 6/22/05, harry gaillac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> look at ser projects:
> asterisk is limited to 250 channels
> You need cat 5e and manage qos if you setup ip phones
> Harry
> --- Don Brearley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
>
Don Brearley wrote:
I do understand that I would need to replace all [300] of my existing
telephones with VoIP-capable
phones, and that I'll need to re-wire most of the campus telephone
infrastructure (it's still
all cat-3) -- these arent problems.
dear Don & the rest,
Imagine:
*replacing
> > I do understand that I would need to replace all of
> > my existing telephones with VoIP-capable
> > phones, and that I'll need to re-wire most of the
> > campus telephone infrastructure (it's still
> > all cat-3) -- these arent problems.
why do you think that you need to do that ?
you could
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 05:32:22PM +0200, harry gaillac wrote:
> look at ser projects:
> asterisk is limited to 250 channels
What kind of crack are you smoking? There are people that have set
up more than 250 channel systems.
Matthew Fredrickson
___
A
> I've been planning to replace my aging CENTREX switch with a new PBX and am
> seriously
> considering Asterisk as my solution.
Great
> I work at a college, and we currently support just under 300 regular analog
> lines to
> the offices and whatnot.
Free help then
> I was wondering.. Is
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:50:42AM -0500, Don Brearley wrote:
> I've been planning to replace my aging CENTREX switch with a new PBX and am
> seriously
> considering Asterisk as my solution.
You have a CENTREX switch? I'm confused.
Do you have a PBX?
Do you pay for Centrex services from your p
, 2005 10:51 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] New Asterisk Implementation
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been planning to replace my aging CENTREX switch with a
> new PBX and am seriously considering Asterisk as my solution.
>
> I work
look at ser projects:
asterisk is limited to 250 channels
You need cat 5e and manage qos if you setup ip phones
Harry
--- Don Brearley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been planning to replace my aging CENTREX
> switch with a new PBX and am seriously
> considering Asterisk as m
Hello,
I've been planning to replace my aging CENTREX switch with a new PBX and am
seriously
considering Asterisk as my solution.
I work at a college, and we currently support just under 300 regular analog
lines to
the offices and whatnot.
I was wondering.. Is asterisk ready for such a jo
13 matches
Mail list logo
