[Asterisk-Users] Newbie question. (Long)

2005-11-18 Thread Roger Hill
Hi all : My first posting to the group - please be gentle! I've been messing with Asterisk for a couple of weeks now. 1.0.9 is running fine on an old laptop (300MHz, 128MB ram, Kubuntu), downloaded the binary package. Now I'm trying to put the working installation on my production server alo

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie question. (Long)

2005-11-18 Thread Vassil Kolarov
Hi Roger, Following this instructions: http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+Fedora+Core+3 I was able to install and run Asterisk several times without problems. See also: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+Linux+Fedora Regards, Vassil Kolarov www.ittconsult.com Rog

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie question. (Long)

2005-11-18 Thread Roger Hill
Thanks Vassil - I'll try those pointers and report back. Roger Vassil Kolarov wrote: Hi Roger, Following this instructions: http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+Fedora+Core+3 I was able to install and run Asterisk several times without problems. See also: http://www.voip-i

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie question. (Long)

2005-11-18 Thread Roger Hill
Hi All: I've been through the compile/install procedure pointed out by Vassil: I still crash on startup. Can anyone else give me some pointers, please? Roger Roger Hill wrote: Thanks Vassil - I'll try those pointers and report back. Roger Vassil Kolarov wrote: Hi Roger, Following this

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie question. (Long)

2005-11-18 Thread Rich Adamson
Asterisk runs just fine on fc3. Best guess on your problem is that you've got come default config parameters in /etc/asterisk directory that it is not liking at all. You might try starting asterisk with 'asterisk -cvd' and watch the output for errors. > Hi All: > > I've b

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie question. (Long)

2005-11-18 Thread Roger Hill
Rich: Thanks. I tried that, with and without any config files in /etc/asterisk. It still falls over instantly, no messages other than 'Illegal Instruction'. Asterisk is running on other machines for me quite happily, but just does not want to play nice on this box. I'm sure I'm doing somethin

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie question. (Long)

2005-11-18 Thread Rich Adamson
Well... the next best guess is the binary package that you downloaded has some dependencies that are not on your system, or, the package simply wasn't intended for your distro (for one reason or another). Does the system have a developement environment that would allow you down download the cvs so

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie question. (Long)

2005-11-18 Thread Roger Hill
Rich: Sorry if I did not make myself clear. I was trying to give some history, which is where the downloaded package came from. On this box (FC4), I am currently downloading the 1.2.0 source from asterisk.org (but not the CVS), and trying to compile and build from scratch. The build seems

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie question. (Long)

2005-11-18 Thread Vassil Kolarov
Roger, Can you try with a fresh Fedora installation on this box? Vassil Roger Hill wrote: Rich: Sorry if I did not make myself clear. I was trying to give some history, which is where the downloaded package came from. On this box (FC4), I am currently downloading the 1.2.0 source from ast

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie question. (Long)

2005-11-18 Thread Jason Becker
Roger Hill wrote: I've been messing with Asterisk for a couple of weeks now. 1.0.9 is running fine on an old laptop (300MHz, 128MB ram, Kubuntu), downloaded the binary package. Now I'm trying to put the working installation on my production server along with HTTP etc. ( 700MHz, 256MB ram, un

Illegal Instruction on new FC4 install [was: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie question. (Long)]

2005-11-18 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:12:46AM +, Roger Hill wrote: > Hi all : > > My first posting to the group - please be gentle! Please use a more descriptive subject line. > > I've been messing with Asterisk for a couple of weeks now. > 1.0.9 is running fine on an old laptop (300MHz, 128MB ram, K