On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> so many phone companies are offering free long distance anymore to compete
> with cell phones (and of course, most, if not all cell phones are free long
> distance) that I think we'll get to a point where anyone in the US will be
> able to call anyone
On Friday 04 February 2005 08:00 am, David Brodbeck wrote:
> > Is providing the ability to assign numbers to people instead of to
> > locations really that hard? Is it really so much easier for Internet
> > domains to do it? Or is this just an oligarchy at work? :)
[snip]
> Billing is based on
David Brodbeck wrote:
Is providing the ability to assign numbers to people instead of to
locations really that hard? Is it really so much easier for Internet
domains to do it? Or is this just an oligarchy at work? :)
A phone number is more analogous to an IP address than a domain name. If
yo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is providing the ability to assign numbers to people instead of to
> locations really that hard? Is it really so much easier for Internet
> domains to do it? Or is this just an oligarchy at work? :)
A phone nu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, then. If a $30/month for a virtual circuit forwarded is as good as it
gets, then that pays for 600 minutes of toll-free number time at
$0.05/minute. On top of the fact that we would like a toll-free number
anyway, it looks like there is almost no reason to keep a "p
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
> On tor, 2005-02-03 at 20:02 +0100, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
> Actually, that is wrong. Any company that uses a 0180x is just single
> minded and purely focused on the german marked. Funny as hell, these
> numbers are simply blocked by nearly any inte
On tor, 2005-02-03 at 20:02 +0100, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
[snip]
> Maybe you have something like that too, where your customers don't pay
> too much and you don't pay too much. A nice side effect is that nobody
> will ever know that your companies HQ is in a lonely little village in
> the middle
On tor, 2005-02-03 at 19:13 +, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 20:02:03 +0100, Stefan Gofferje
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Maybe you have something like that too, where your customers don't pay
> > too much and you don't pay too much. A nice side effect is that nobody
> > will
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com wrote on 02/03/2005 02:20:57 PM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Also, we're currently looking into toll-free service, but the
alternatives
> > seem to be much the same. At least nobody is telling us if there is a
way
> > to lock in a certain number even if we c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, we're currently looking into toll-free service, but the alternatives
seem to be much the same. At least nobody is telling us if there is a way
to lock in a certain number even if we change providers. They've all told
us that the number we receive is theirs, and i
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 20:02:03 +0100, Stefan Gofferje
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe you have something like that too, where your customers don't pay
> too much and you don't pay too much. A nice side effect is that nobody
> will ever know that your companies HQ is in a lonely little village in
o an Email address, website,
VoIP addresses, etc. Check out our
http://www.e164.org/
Max Rivera
Asterisk-Brasil
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 5:44 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] OT: How to "own" a telephone number?
&
Hello!
We are open to the possibility of changing our business telephone number
shortly. This will most likely be necessary due to a physical move,
changing providers and a few other reasons. However, we woud like this to
be the *last* time we need to do this. Ever. No matter what. Is that
13 matches
Mail list logo
