Dear All,
Based on your experience and knowledge, which Redhat (7.3, 8 or 9) and which
kernel is most stable and reliable running the 0.7.1 version of Asterisk?
Thanks
Tom
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.563 / Vir
Dear All
Should one enable HT in the chip when running Asterisk or if we don't, would
that offer alot less processing power?
Tom
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.563 / Virus Database: 355 - Release Date: 1/17/2004
I received a good response that recommends Kernel 2.4.0, but is that very
old version? Anyone out there who has had experience with running 0.7.1 with
a particular version of Kernel and Redhat?
THanks
Tommy
-Original Message-
From: T. Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January
T. Chan wrote:
Dear All
Should one enable HT in the chip when running Asterisk or if we don't, would
that offer alot less processing power?
T
I have read before that HT did not help Asterisk so should be dissabled,
but as the chipsets and other hardware get better at using and
controlling HT i
I'd recommend 2.4.0.
Steven.
On Sunday 18 January 2004 21:35, T. Chan wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Based on your experience and knowledge, which Redhat (7.3, 8 or 9) and
> which kernel is most stable and reliable running the 0.7.1 version of
> Asterisk?
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom
> ---
> Outgoing mail is cert
s over the Intel
platform.
MATT---
-Original Message-
From: WipeOut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 2:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Latest version of asterisk
T. Chan wrote:
>Dear All
>
>Should one enable HT in the chip wh
: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Latest version of asterisk
Hello,
I've had Asterisk installed on HT capable machines in both HT mode(with SMP)
and non HT mode (with non-SMP) and did not notice any differences
functionally between them. The processor load was al
took it out it was VERY hot. We then put in a 3com 905 card and
haven't had an issue with it yet.
Hope this helps,
MATT---
-Original Message-
From: T. Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 4:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Lates
onday, January 19, 2004 6:21 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Latest version of asterisk
Hello,
Our max for a single machine is 40 concurrent SIP -> Zap conversations for
about a 12 hour period and over 5000 total phone calls per day. We didn't
see
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Latest version of asterisk
Hello Matt,
Is that the Wildcard TE410P you are using. Digium said that it had some
problems with Redhat 9.0 is that correct?
- Digium quad T1 card
- 3 T1's (2 x B8ZS ESF Long Distance and 1 x
10 matches
Mail list logo
