[Asterisk-Users] Re: Explicit Dialplan Exit

2006-06-01 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -=-=-=-=-=- > -=-=-=-=-=- > > Eh, I'm thinking I don't like labels very much. They aren't all they are > cracked up to be. > > Previously, using extensions of the format extension-function, like > 2944000-open or > 2

RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Explicit Dialplan Exit

2006-05-31 Thread Michael Collins
plan simplified without losing its power.   -MC   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Garstang Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:27 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Explicit Dialplan Exit  

Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Explicit Dialplan Exit

2006-05-31 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Douglas Garstang wrote: > Previously, using extensions of the format extension-function, like > 2944000-open or 2944000-closed for example, I could break up an extension > into logical units based on function, and it made sense. By exclusively using > labels, everthing is in the one extension a

[Asterisk-Users] RE: Explicit Dialplan Exit

2006-05-31 Thread Douglas Garstang
Eh, I'm thinking I don't like labels very much. They aren't all they are cracked up to be.   Previously, using extensions of the format extension-function, like 2944000-open or 2944000-closed for example, I could break up an extension into logical units based on function, and it made sense.