Hey I am intrested in testing this thing out , i was already trying to
work out something of my own when i found this ,s o can we work on
this?
~uppal
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:23:26 +0200, Mike Tkachuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Want to say that it not latest version of this tool
Hello All,
Want to say that it not latest version of this tool.
Currently I created project on berlios.de called b2bua.
There I will post latest version.
What is this tool? Currently it's AGI script with many asterisk
patches. It support some authorization, accounting (start, stop), LCR,
'Smart'
http://voipbill.sf.net/asterisk_b2bua_v0.1.tgz
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aste
Any other source?, I'm getting not found on that host
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Tkachuk
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 6:06 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: FW: [Asterisk-Users] Radius on *
Hello all,
Hello all,
It's my try to make some 'emulation' of vovida's b2bua using asterisk.
I was in rush while writing it, so I sure there is much code that can
be cleaned, great that not too much. :)
http://dslmax.boom.ru/asterisk_b2bua_v0.1.zip
cdrradius and agi script inside.
__
Mike Tkachuk
I have. I use own developed AGI radius script for auth and acct.
Also I rewrote minitelecom radius module for CDR radius generating.
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:31:16 -0300, Tenorio, Leandro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm currently trying to use a Radius server for acct and auth, cause
> much of ou
I'm currently trying to use a Radius server for acct and auth, cause
much of our systems are using it.
Anyone has an asterisk server working with Radius Auth and Acct?
Tkx, LTenorio
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http
On 17-11 16:33, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
> Sebastian Nocetti wrote:
>
> >Does Asterisk support Radius accounting?
> >
> >
>
> No and there is absolutely no need for it to. RADIUS is not anything
> that should have ever been deployed in a VoIP environment.
You would be surprised how man
hi.
Il mar, 2003-11-18 alle 20:33, Andrew Kohlsmith ha scritto:
> >
> > I have no need for H.323 or Skinny or SIP; IAX works fine...
> > H.323 is something that should never ever have been invented...
> >
>
> I feel the same way about SIP. What a nasty protocol. :-(
the really big problem is
>
> I have no need for H.323 or Skinny or SIP; IAX works fine...
> H.323 is something that should never ever have been invented...
>
I feel the same way about SIP. What a nasty protocol. :-(
Regards,
Andrew
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PRO
> No and there is absolutely no need for it to. RADIUS is not anything
> that should have ever been deployed in a VoIP environment.
I have no need for H.323 or Skinny or SIP; IAX works fine...
H.323 is something that should never ever have been invented...
I fully agree with the things
SIP Express Router have radius support. Look there for hints on how to get
Radius support for VOIP.
http://iptel.org/ser/
/O
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
Oh and BTW, UTFG before asking a question. You would have probably seen
... UTFG?
May the Google be with you, always :-)
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-
Amen
Lars Boegild Thomsen wrote:
I won't agree that RADIUS shouldn't ever have been deployed in a VoIP
environment. While it can be argued that RADIUS is not in any way an ideal
solution and it can also be argued if it is necessary in a PBX software such
as Asterisk, fact is that many IP service
day, November 18, 2003 6:07 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Radius on *
>
>I won't agree that RADIUS shouldn't ever have been deployed in a VoIP
>environment. While it can be argued that RADIUS is not in any way an
>ideal
>solution and it c
ation policies than asterisk can offer.
Arslan.
-Original Message-
From: Lars Boegild Thomsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 6:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Radius on *
I won't agree that RADIUS shouldn't ever have been dep
> > happy that Vonage is doing good for you and that you've made a name
> > for
yourself, but it doesn't mean you're top dog in the VOIP world and
> > know what is and isn't good for Asterisk to the general populace.
> WTF where did vonage come into this picture. I think you ment NuFone.
hahaha
done through RADIUS, which would make
mass-deployment of Asterisk boxes a lot simpler to administrate.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy
> McNamara
> Sent: 18 November 2003 05:33
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> happy that Vonage is doing good for you and that you've made a name for
> yourself, but it doesn't mean you're top dog in the VOIP world and know
> what is and isn't good for Asterisk to the general populace.
WTF where did vonage come into this picture. I think you ment NuFone.
bkw
___
> looks like critchy is especially bitchy
Perhaps, but every single one of his points is valid. Some days I wish
there were a license required to log on to the internet, and even stricter
ones to participate in mailing lists.
Just because we live in a land of high speed access, bloatware f
> Oh and BTW, UTFG before asking a question. You would have probably seen
... UTFG?
Regards,
Andrew
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> No and there is absolutely no need for it to. RADIUS is not anything
> that should have ever been deployed in a VoIP environment.
I love the small-mindedness that some people on these lists show. "I have
absolutely no need for it, therefore there is no need for it at all."
> There are many
On 17/11/2003 at 18:39 Steve Totaro wrote:
>looks like critchy is especially bitchy
>
>
With all his whinging, if i didn't know any better, I'd suspect he was using a 2400
baud modem...
Now I'm off to reply a message and change the subject line
Andy
looks like critchy is especially bitchy
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Critchfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Radius on *
> Dude, you deserve a double dipping in f
> >Does Asterisk support Radius accounting?
> >
>
> No and there is absolutely no need for it to. RADIUS is not anything
> that should have ever been deployed in a VoIP environment.
>
> There are many methods to talk directly to a database, why add another
> layer of complexity and point of f
Dude, you deserve a double dipping in flaming hot sauce for this stupid
post.
I'll give you that the question isn't stupid, just the way you went
about asking it.
First you point out why I hate people who use digest format of a mailing
list that is many to many communications. You just sent the
Sebastian Nocetti wrote:
Does Asterisk support Radius accounting?
No and there is absolutely no need for it to. RADIUS is not anything
that should have ever been deployed in a VoIP environment.
There are many methods to talk directly to a database, why add another
layer of complexity
Does Asterisk support Radius accounting?
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Lunes, 17 de Noviembre de 2003 12:08 p.m.
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #1912 - 11 msgs
Send Asterisk-
28 matches
Mail list logo
