[Asterisk-Users] Re: HooDaHek 0.6 Released

2005-09-21 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The eth suffix is oft abused, and oft he who writeth it knoweth not the rules. Such as IBM (or their ad agency), who came up with IBM can helpeth in a TV advert!!! Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

[Asterisk-Users] Re: HooDaHek 0.6 Released

2005-09-20 Thread Steven
OK Great, I'll give it a shot. I did find this other option http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20050309.013714.2d1bf446.en.html , but I do not really want to imbed this info in the asterisk database if I can have it external. (note: this other option did work when tested) -- -- Steven May

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: HooDaHek 0.6 Released

2005-09-20 Thread Nathan Pralle
Steven wrote: I did find this other option http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20050309.013714.2d1bf446.en.html , but I do not really want to imbed this info in the asterisk database if I can have it external. (note: this other option did work when tested) Yeah, I tried that when I first

[Asterisk-Users] Re: HooDaHek 0.6 Released

2005-09-20 Thread Steven
I played around with finding the right place to call the agi. Since my config started as [EMAIL PROTECTED], there are a lot of macros that complicate things. I put the agi in the macro-dial and it is working as expected. (just the CLID record and change) Thanks for the new tool. ref:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: HooDaHek 0.6 Released

2005-09-20 Thread Nathan Pralle
Steven, Do you think the below dialplan would be typical for almost any [EMAIL PROTECTED] setup? If so, I'll add it as supplimental documentation for HooDaHek for those wanting to use it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Nathan Steven wrote: I played around with finding the right place to