Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Remote Disconnects

2004-05-25 Thread Steve Underwood
Rich Adamson wrote: Using the fxs_ls settings, the TE410P does not see when the remote side drops the call. Is e&m signaling a more reliable way to go? e&m signaling was designed years ago to address the problems that existed with loop start, so yes it is more reliable. Eh? E&M predates loo

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Remote Disconnects

2004-05-25 Thread Rich Adamson
> Is there any way to debug the TE410P and see if it > sees the loop start signals? I don't have a 410P, but you might take a look at /etc/asterisk/logger.conf and add "debug" to the messages line. Restart asterisk and check the /var/log/asterisk log files. You can also try running asterisk fr

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Remote Disconnects

2004-05-25 Thread Joseph
Is there any way to debug the TE410P and see if it sees the loop start signals? Using the fxs_ls settings, the TE410P does not see when the remote side drops the call. Is e&m signaling a more reliable way to go? On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 11:41, Joseph wrote: > Using a Wildcard TE410P, I have span2