AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5
jitterbufferfor svn trunk + jitterbuffer
jitterbuffer-1.2 for 1.2 + jitterbuffer
test-
jitterbufferfor svn trunk + jitterbuffer
jitterbuffer-1.2 for 1.2 + jitterbuffer
test-this-branchfor the test branch with a lot of cool stuff
including
the jitterbuffer
I installed the jitterbuffer-1.2 branch and I have a few questions.
First
14 mar 2006 kl. 19.00 skrev Robert Webb:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:32:02 +0100
Olle E Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
14 mar 2006 kl. 13.35 skrev Matt:
Right saw that. But I'm trying to get away from using CVS-HEAD :)
We all are. Every developer have switched from CVS to Subversion :-)
14 mar 2006 kl. 15.38 skrev Matt:
The "jitterbuffer" branch is based on svn trunk (the same as the old
"CVS HEAD")
The "jitterbuffer-1.2" branch is based on the 1.2 branch HEAD
(meaning latest 1.2 version code).
Ok... so if I pull the 'jitterbuffer' branch I would get 'svn trunk
code'.
Bu
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:44:57 -0500
Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/team/oej/jitterbuffer-1.2/
Thank you I was looking directly under asterisk and
not team. :-)
Robert
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provid
http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/team/oej/jitterbuffer-1.2/
On 3/14/06, Robert Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:32:02 +0100
> Olle E Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 14 mar 2006 kl. 13.35 skrev Matt:
> >
> >> Right saw that. But I'm trying to get away f
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:32:02 +0100
Olle E Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
14 mar 2006 kl. 13.35 skrev Matt:
Right saw that. But I'm trying to get away from using
CVS-HEAD :)
We all are. Every developer have switched from CVS to
Subversion :-)
This is not the development branch, but
> The "jitterbuffer" branch is based on svn trunk (the same as the old
> "CVS HEAD")
> The "jitterbuffer-1.2" branch is based on the 1.2 branch HEAD
> (meaning latest 1.2 version code).
Ok... so if I pull the 'jitterbuffer' branch I would get 'svn trunk code'.
But if I pull 'jitterbuffer-1.2' I g
14 mar 2006 kl. 13.35 skrev Matt:
Right saw that. But I'm trying to get away from using CVS-HEAD :)
We all are. Every developer have switched from CVS to Subversion :-)
This is not the development branch, but the release branch code,
which we use to create the 1.2.x releases.
The jitterbuf
Right saw that. But I'm trying to get away from using CVS-HEAD :)
Is the jitterbuffer patch PURELY 1.2.5 with the patch in place?
On 3/14/06, Olle E Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 13 mar 2006 kl. 21.59 skrev Matt:
>
> > Hi,
> > I really want to start using 1.2.5, but I also really n
13 mar 2006 kl. 21.59 skrev Matt:
Hi,
I really want to start using 1.2.5, but I also really need to have the
jitter buffer. Can anyone offer a suggestion of how to go? I've
looked at the SIP_JB patch and there seems to be no indication of a
patch for the 1.2.5 release.
Look again. There is
Hi,
I really want to start using 1.2.5, but I also really need to have the
jitter buffer. Can anyone offer a suggestion of how to go? I've
looked at the SIP_JB patch and there seems to be no indication of a
patch for the 1.2.5 release.
___
--Bandwidth
12 matches
Mail list logo
