Hi,
Does enabling a jitter buffer in sip.conf make sense if the call is pure SIP?
--
I think it should help on the Asterisk receiving side in case of unreliable
bandwidth.
Vieri
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation
On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 00:44 -0800, satish patel wrote:
> What is SIP jitter buffer how can i test it ???
Why don't you just ask Google? Gives tons of answers:
http://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+a+jitter+buffer
The jitter buffer config can be found in sip.conf
Regards,
Patrick
What is SIP jitter buffer how can i test it ???
PGP Signature--
Satish Patel
mobile:- +91-9818875535
http://www.linuxbug.org
-
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage.___
--B
Damon Estep wrote:
> Thanks a bunch. So in theory the media gateway at the far end should be
> able to properly jitter buffer the entire RTP path from the ATA via
> asterisk, correct?
>
> Would this be the same in 1.2 and it 1.4?
Yes, that is correct, but only for 1.4. In the case of Asterisk 1.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russell Bryant
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 11:06 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP jitter buffer a
Damon Estep wrote:
> Anyone know the answer? Has it been validated with packet captures, or
> code review?
All of the timing information should be passed across the bridge in all of the
frames that come in over RTP. I can't say I verified this with packet
captures,
but I did look for this in
There is a theory that says that jitter buffers should not be used until
the end of the voice path where jitter might be introduced. With that in
mind, and in this scenario, the jitter buffers should reside at the ATA
and media gateway;
ATA (SIP UA) <> ASTERISK NATIVE BRIDGE <> MEDIA GATEWAY (
Hey that looks like it might do it!
On 4/11/07, Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 13:15 -0400, Matt wrote:
> Hi,
> I know that there was a jitter buffer patch (for sip) for the 1.0.9
> branch some time agin. At this time, we can not upgrade to 1.4.x.
> Is there a usea
I did find the jitter buffer patch on the bug-tracker...(ast_jb-1.2.0.patch4).
I applied it to a 1.2.6 asterisk and it seemed to apply all but 2 small
chunks (which I was able to apply myself)... it then compiled... so I'm
going to give it a shot and test it out. I will report back results.
On
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 13:15 -0400, Matt wrote:
> Hi,
> I know that there was a jitter buffer patch (for sip) for the 1.0.9
> branch some time agin. At this time, we can not upgrade to 1.4.x.
> Is there a useable, fairly stable INCOMING sip jitter buffer patch?
> That is.. I want Asterisk to jit
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Matt said something to this effect:
I know that there was a jitter buffer patch (for sip) for the 1.0.9 branch
some time agin. At this time, we can not upgrade to 1.4.x. Is there a
useable, fairly stable INCOMING sip jitter buffer patch? That is.. I want
Asterisk to j
Hi,
I know that there was a jitter buffer patch (for sip) for the 1.0.9 branch
some time agin. At this time, we can not upgrade to 1.4.x. Is there a
useable, fairly stable INCOMING sip jitter buffer patch? That is.. I want
Asterisk to jitter buffer incoming SIP packets.
AFAIK, it's only available in Head.
Julian.
James Gardiner wrote:
Hi,
I am keen to try out the SIP jitter buffer capability. I hear this was
available if HEAD.
I was wondering if a version of the latest STABLE with this additional
feature was available some place.. Or is it simply best to
Hi,
I am keen to try out the SIP jitter buffer capability. I hear this was
available if HEAD.
I was wondering if a version of the latest STABLE with this additional
feature was available some place.. Or is it simply best to use HEAD?
Would some one be kind enough to point me in the right d
Hello,
Is there anyone using sip jitter buffer with callingcard application? it
seems like there is a memory leak that dosent let the app_prepaid_call to
insert acc_start informations in database and send the call so the
asterisk segfaults.
Best Regard,
Hekuran
___
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Jitter Buffer for 1.2.5
jitterbufferfor svn trunk + jitterbuffer
jitterbuffer-1.2 for 1.2 + jitterbuffer
test-
jitterbufferfor svn trunk + jitterbuffer
jitterbuffer-1.2 for 1.2 + jitterbuffer
test-this-branchfor the test branch with a lot of cool stuff
including
the jitterbuffer
I installed the jitterbuffer-1.2 branch and I have a few questions.
First
14 mar 2006 kl. 19.00 skrev Robert Webb:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:32:02 +0100
Olle E Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
14 mar 2006 kl. 13.35 skrev Matt:
Right saw that. But I'm trying to get away from using CVS-HEAD :)
We all are. Every developer have switched from CVS to Subversion :-)
14 mar 2006 kl. 15.38 skrev Matt:
The "jitterbuffer" branch is based on svn trunk (the same as the old
"CVS HEAD")
The "jitterbuffer-1.2" branch is based on the 1.2 branch HEAD
(meaning latest 1.2 version code).
Ok... so if I pull the 'jitterbuffer' branch I would get 'svn trunk
code'.
Bu
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:44:57 -0500
Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/team/oej/jitterbuffer-1.2/
Thank you I was looking directly under asterisk and
not team. :-)
Robert
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provid
http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/team/oej/jitterbuffer-1.2/
On 3/14/06, Robert Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:32:02 +0100
> Olle E Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 14 mar 2006 kl. 13.35 skrev Matt:
> >
> >> Right saw that. But I'm trying to get away f
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:32:02 +0100
Olle E Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
14 mar 2006 kl. 13.35 skrev Matt:
Right saw that. But I'm trying to get away from using
CVS-HEAD :)
We all are. Every developer have switched from CVS to
Subversion :-)
This is not the development branch, but
> The "jitterbuffer" branch is based on svn trunk (the same as the old
> "CVS HEAD")
> The "jitterbuffer-1.2" branch is based on the 1.2 branch HEAD
> (meaning latest 1.2 version code).
Ok... so if I pull the 'jitterbuffer' branch I would get 'svn trunk code'.
But if I pull 'jitterbuffer-1.2' I g
14 mar 2006 kl. 13.35 skrev Matt:
Right saw that. But I'm trying to get away from using CVS-HEAD :)
We all are. Every developer have switched from CVS to Subversion :-)
This is not the development branch, but the release branch code,
which we use to create the 1.2.x releases.
The jitterbuf
Right saw that. But I'm trying to get away from using CVS-HEAD :)
Is the jitterbuffer patch PURELY 1.2.5 with the patch in place?
On 3/14/06, Olle E Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 13 mar 2006 kl. 21.59 skrev Matt:
>
> > Hi,
> > I really want to start using 1.2.5, but I also really n
13 mar 2006 kl. 21.59 skrev Matt:
Hi,
I really want to start using 1.2.5, but I also really need to have the
jitter buffer. Can anyone offer a suggestion of how to go? I've
looked at the SIP_JB patch and there seems to be no indication of a
patch for the 1.2.5 release.
Look again. There is
Hi,
I really want to start using 1.2.5, but I also really need to have the
jitter buffer. Can anyone offer a suggestion of how to go? I've
looked at the SIP_JB patch and there seems to be no indication of a
patch for the 1.2.5 release.
___
--Bandwidth
I am using it with CVS-HEAD but it is currently a patch. So far
the version of the patch I have (which was the first one released)..
seems to be working very well.. and definately makes a noticeable
improvement.
On 9/1/05, Damon Estep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Did the sip jitter
Did the sip jitter buffer make it into 1.2? anyone using it?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To
See it thanks... seems rather sparce on documentation... how does
one go about turning the jitter buffer on?
On 8/25/05, Richard Scobie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt wrote:
> > Am I correct in thinking that at this time the CVS-HEAD supports
> > Jitter Buffer for SIP on Asterisk?
>
> No, b
Matt wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that at this time the CVS-HEAD supports
Jitter Buffer for SIP on Asterisk?
No, but attached to "issue" 3854 you will find patches you may be able
to apply to the current CVS-Head to acheive this.
Regards,
Richard
_
Matt wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking that at this time the CVS-HEAD supports
> Jitter Buffer for SIP on Asterisk?
No, you are incorrect.
/o
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.di
Am I correct in thinking that at this time the CVS-HEAD supports
Jitter Buffer for SIP on Asterisk?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options vi
> I am using CVS latest
>
> Is it correct there is no jitter buffer for SIP (RTP)
>
> Are there any plans for this?
>
> prob a stupid question:
> Is it required / do the endpoints handle this - if the
> src and destination are both SIP and there is no
> transcoding but asterisk is still in the m
Hi
I am using CVS latest
Is it correct there is no jitter buffer for SIP (RTP)
Are there any plans for this?
prob a stupid question:
Is it required / do the endpoints handle this - if the
src and destination are both SIP and there is no
transcoding but asterisk is still in the media path?
Th
Matt Schulte wrote:
I'm assuming asterisk does not have a SIP jitter buffer in place? Any
ideas on how to help with this going over a data T1 where VoIP is shared
with regular traffic? Problem is when people are downloading the voice
is jittery, even lossy.
I think what you are looking for is QOS (
Matt Schulte wrote:
I'm assuming asterisk does not have a SIP jitter buffer in place? Any
ideas on how to help with this going over a data T1 where VoIP is shared
with regular traffic? Problem is when people are downloading the voice
is jittery, even lossy.
Where do the calls go?
If it goes <*>
I'm assuming asterisk does not have a SIP jitter buffer in place? Any
ideas on how to help with this going over a data T1 where VoIP is shared
with regular traffic? Problem is when people are downloading the voice
is jittery, even lossy.
Matt
___
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Public Dump wrote:
> What is the status of a jitter buffer implemenation for SIP ?
> Implemented / planed / total void ?
It's planned to do a unified jitter buffer. But I haven't managed to find
the focussed time so far to get it done.
Steve
What is the status
of a jitter buffer implemenation for SIP ?
Implemented / planed
/ total void ?
chris.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visi
This is kind of a repost of one part of a previous question I have had.
Peer UsernameCall ID Seq (Tx/Rx) Lag Jitter
Format
213.137.73.178 xx 3705df0a5f7 00103/0 0ms ms
4
1 active SIP channel(s)
I see that there is 0ms Jitter set. How can I set
41 matches
Mail list logo