Hi All
Has anything been done to fix the issue where the * box is sat behind a
nat firewall?
Regards
Mark
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Mark Evans wrote:
Hi All
Has anything been done to fix the issue where the * box is sat behind a
nat firewall?
Regards
Mark
As far as I know it can't be done.. The server has to be on a public IP..
You could try using a SIP aware router like the intertex range but I
don't know how much mil
At 4:01 PM +0100 10/20/03, WipeOut wrote:
Mark Evans wrote:
Hi All
Has anything been done to fix the issue where the * box is sat behind a
nat firewall?
Regards
Mark
As far as I know it can't be done.. The server has to be on a public IP..
You could try using a SIP aware router like the inter
Asterisk works perfectly fine in back of a NAT firewall, as long
as all of your SIP phones are also in back of that same fire
wall ;-)
Seriously, I'd fix this if I knew enough about SIP protocol.
Is anyone willing to write up what is required at the "bit and byte
level"? One thing that could he
Actually it requires CHANGING the SIP protocol. Asterisk already
changes the SIP protocol when you use nat=yes and many clients also
change the SIP protocol to work with NAT.
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 11:31, Chris Albertson wrote:
> Asterisk works perfectly fine in back of a NAT firewall, as long
> a
yes, regarding sip, but I have stil problems with rtp
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 4:49 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Nat Issue
> Hi All
>
> Has anything been done t
--- Eric Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually it requires CHANGING the SIP protocol. Asterisk already
> changes the SIP protocol when you use nat=yes and many clients also
> change the SIP protocol to work with NAT.
Is it really a change to the format of what is sent or is it that
only
to be more specific, I only managed to get xten softphone register to *
behind the nat fw, but nothing else.
- Original Message -
From: "Tomica Crnek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users]
--- Tomica Crnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to be more specific, I only managed to get xten softphone register to
> *
> behind the nat fw, but nothing else.
Where was the firewall?
1) Between xten X-Lite and the public Internet or,
2) Between Asterisk and the Publict Internet or
3) Bot
You should start by reading the specific SIP and RTP RFCs. SIP is less
of an issue than RTP (as someone else pointed out)
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 12:47, Chris Albertson wrote:
> --- Eric Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually it requires CHANGING the SIP protocol. Asterisk already
> > cha
Chris Albertson wrote:
X-Lite _can_ dail out to FWD through a firewall but Asterisk can't.
SO this gives us the perfect chance to compare the content of
outbound packets where we have a working and non-working example.
X-lite when configured for FWD behind a NAT uses an outbound proxy
for that con
Eric Wieling wrote:
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 11:31, Chris Albertson wrote:
Asterisk works perfectly fine in back of a NAT firewall, as long
as all of your SIP phones are also in back of that same fire
wall ;-)
Seriously, I'd fix this if I knew enough about SIP protocol.
Is anyone willing to write up
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Tomica Crnek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Nat Issue
>
> --- Tomica Crnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > to be more specific, I only managed to get xten softph
13 matches
Mail list logo
