Re: [Asterisk-Users] SNOM 200 and Asterisk Woes

2004-08-11 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Olle E. Johansson wrote: Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: You start up the phones, they register, all is good. They show up in sip show peers like thus: danm/danm65.125.237.91D N 255.255.255.255 5060 OK (29 ms) We pass a few calls in and out, and as

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SNOM 200 and Asterisk Woes

2004-08-10 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: You start up the phones, they register, all is good. They show up in sip show peers like thus: danm/danm65.125.237.91D N 255.255.255.255 5060 OK (29 ms) We pass a few calls in and out, and asterisk "deadlocks" (not a true deadlock, see

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SNOM 200 and Asterisk Woes

2004-08-10 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Todd Lieberman wrote: Looks like a firewall issue too me. Some of the snoms are behind NAT. However, my test one was on the same subnet, and exhibited the same problems. The asterisk box has firewalling disabled. A firewall issue, I would think, would not cause a registrat

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SNOM 200 and Asterisk Woes

2004-08-10 Thread Todd Lieberman
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: Okay, this one is driving me nuts. I have a fedora core 1 machine running asterisk from CVS. Built last week. I have a couple of snom phones with the latest firmware. Here's the issue, it's a wierd one. You start up the phones, they register, all is good. They

[Asterisk-Users] SNOM 200 and Asterisk Woes

2004-08-10 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
Okay, this one is driving me nuts. I have a fedora core 1 machine running asterisk from CVS. Built last week. I have a couple of snom phones with the latest firmware. Here's the issue, it's a wierd one. You start up the phones, they register, all is good. They show up in sip show peers like t