RE: [Asterisk-Users] SPA and NAT traversal

2005-04-10 Thread Jim Sturtevant
-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SPA and NAT traversal In your second option using a STUN server would I need to setup my own STUN server? No, use FWD or xten's STUN servers. -- Nabeel Jafferali X2 Networks www.x2n.ca T: 1.647.722.6900    1.877.VOIP.X2N F: 1.866.655.6698

[Asterisk-Users] SPA and NAT traversal

2005-04-09 Thread Jim Sturtevant
I was hoping someone might help me diagnose a NAT issue with an SPA-2000 and my * server. My SPA is behind a NAT accessing a server which is also behind a NAT but SIP and RTP ports are forwarded to it. My SPA can successfully register. It can call another extension which is inside the * local

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA and NAT traversal

2005-04-09 Thread Eric Wieling
Jim Sturtevant wrote: I was hoping someone might help me diagnose a NAT issue with an SPA-2000 and my * server. My SPA is behind a NAT accessing a server which is also behind a NAT but SIP and RTP ports are forwarded to it. My SPA can successfully register. It can call another extension which

RE: [Asterisk-Users] SPA and NAT traversal

2005-04-09 Thread Jim Sturtevant
it to yourself? :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 11:25 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA and NAT traversal Jim Sturtevant wrote: I

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA and NAT traversal

2005-04-09 Thread Eric Wieling
Jim Sturtevant wrote: Thank you for your reply. There is a wealth of information on the wiki, etc. I turned on RTP debug and the SPA is not sending it's public IP it is sending it's NAT IP (192.168.1.100) so *'s RTP packets are going nowhere... nat=yes makes Asterisk use the public IP that is

RE: [Asterisk-Users] SPA and NAT traversal

2005-04-09 Thread Nabeel Jafferali
Thank you for your reply. There is a wealth of information on the wiki, etc. I turned on RTP debug and the SPA is not sending it's public IP it is sending it's NAT IP (192.168.1.100) so *'s RTP packets are going nowhere... Do I understand your question correctly: You have an SPA behind

RE: [Asterisk-Users] SPA and NAT traversal

2005-04-09 Thread Jim Sturtevant
Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SPA and NAT traversal Thank you for your reply. There is a wealth of information on the wiki, etc. I turned on RTP debug and the SPA is not sending it's public IP it is sending it's NAT IP (192.168.1.100) so *'s RTP packets are going nowhere... Do I

RE: [Asterisk-Users] SPA and NAT traversal

2005-04-09 Thread Nabeel Jafferali
In your second option using a STUN server would I need to setup my own STUN server? No, use FWD or xten's STUN servers. -- Nabeel Jafferali X2 Networks www.x2n.ca T: 1.647.722.6900    1.877.VOIP.X2N F: 1.866.655.6698 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA and NAT traversal

2005-04-09 Thread Michael D Schelin
The only way you ll be able to call extension to extension is if Asterisk is on the same node behind the nat. like the extensions or if each extension is on a different node. I run a proxie server and have ran through this problem many time. I bet you can call out bound to the outside world