I'm just curious why Sipura isn't using free IAX protocol with their
devices instead of SIP?
With IAX NAT traversal would have been easier, so why are they using
SIP.
Is there any politics in it?
--
#Joseph
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Because SIP works with things other than Asterisk. IAX does not.
Roman Volf
Keystreams Internet Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joseph wrote:
I'm just curious why Sipura isn't using free IAX protocol with their
devices instead of SIP?
With IAX NAT traversal would have been easier, so why are they
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:47:21 -0700, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just curious why Sipura isn't using free IAX protocol with their
devices instead of SIP?
* SIP isn't a standard. It could be made into an official standard,
if there was a standards document. Someone should write one, and
you mean IAX isn't a standard :) Also IAX requires your call router /
billing gateway to handle the voice traffic too (or you put your CDR
recording at the end points) With SIP, just the signaling is needed,
allowing more scalability. I recall talking about this at astericon but
it never
* SIP isn't a standard. It could be made into an official standard,
if there was a standards document. Someone should write one, and
start an IETF working-group. If the IETF adopted it, there would be
wider acceptance.
True it isn't. However it has a written spec (I have not seen such a
