Steve Underwood wrote:
> Matthew Boehm wrote:
>
>> Steve Underwood wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> The bigegst holdup has really been the poor state of T.38 support in
>>> current equipment. Few ATAs do it. Fewer do it right.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Care to share which ones do it right? We purchased 2 ATA's all
>> wh
Matthew Boehm wrote:
Steve Underwood wrote:
The bigegst holdup has really been the poor state of T.38 support in
current equipment. Few ATAs do it. Fewer do it right.
Care to share which ones do it right? We purchased 2 ATA's all which
claim to do T38 and they don't. (Azatel, WorldAxx)
-
Steve Underwood wrote:
> The bigegst holdup has really been the poor state of T.38 support in
> current equipment. Few ATAs do it. Fewer do it right.
Care to share which ones do it right? We purchased 2 ATA's all which
claim to do T38 and they don't. (Azatel, WorldAxx)
-Matthew
ay, March
16, 2005 4:11 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] t.38 support news?
Maybe I've missed it but I'm wondering if there has been any movement
towards getting t.38 support into asterisk.. has there been any ne
Maybe I've missed it but I'm wondering if there has been any movement
towards getting t.38 support into asterisk.. has there been any news?
Where is t.38 support at? will it even happen?
Steve Underwood is working on it. There's a bounty at
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%2
gt;
>>> -Nate
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Matt Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 4:11 PM
>>> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>>> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] t.38 s
tomorrow.
-Nate
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 4:11 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] t.38 support news?
Maybe I've missed it but I'm wondering if there has been an
--Original Message-
From: Matt Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 4:11 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] t.38 support news?
Maybe I've missed it but I'm wondering if there has been any movement
towards
Maybe I've missed it but I'm wondering if there has been any movement
towards getting t.38 support into asterisk.. has there been any news?
Where is t.38 support at? will it even happen?
begin:vcard
fn:Matt Hess
n:Hess;Matt
org:LiveWireNet
adr;dom:;;4577 Pecos St;Denver;CO;80211
email;internet:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> Checking our fax logs, almost *every* company we fax (several hundred) all
> connect at > 14.4kbps and have the ECM or whatever it's called turned on.
This is our experience as well. Most companies here in Sweden seem to have
moved to laser faxes a
On November 29, 2004 07:01 pm, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Its a pain that a T.38 gateway actually needs to support quite a bit of
> T.30, just so it knows when to switch between the various modems.
> People ask why I implemented a full fax machine in spandsp, rather than
> just building a modem, and
Darren Nickerson wrote:
James H. Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
T.38 is often put forward as the solution for reliable FAX over VOIP.
With good reason ;-)
Just wondering for anyone using T.38 (with any equipment), how well does
it work as compared to a FAX PSTN call?
Our experience is that it'
James H. Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
T.38 is often put forward as the solution for reliable FAX over VOIP.
With good reason ;-)
Just wondering for anyone using T.38 (with any equipment), how well does
it work as compared to a FAX PSTN call?
Our experience is that it's only as good as the T.30
T.38 is often put forward as the solution for reliable FAX
over VOIP.
Just wondering for anyone using T.38 (with any equipment), how
well does it work as compared to a FAX PSTN call?
Thanks.
Jim
James H. Thompson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-U
14 matches
Mail list logo
