Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Kevin Bockman wrote:
I agree on both points. I'm not sure if anyone from Digium actually
reads the -users lists though.
Sorry, I shouldn't have said that. I didn't mean it that way. It all
blurs for me too. I didn't think I ever saw you post to -users, but I
guess
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
Kevin Fleming slogs through this list just as I do. It's a lot to keep up
with. Hell I think he even does it off the clock, as I do.
Yep, that's what I do, even when my asterisk-users folder has 800+
messages in it from five days of not keeping up :-)
__
Kevin Bockman wrote:
I agree on both points. I'm not sure if anyone from Digium actually
reads the -users lists though.
Yes, we do, and some of us even respond, even at 9:15PM while watching
game 4 of the World Series :-)
As far as the 3.3V vs 5V issue, that was purely a design choice; San
On 10/23/05, Andrew Kohlsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 23 October 2005 21:40, Kevin Bockman wrote:
> > I agree on both points. I'm not sure if anyone from Digium actually
> > reads the -users lists though.
>
> Kevin Fleming slogs through this list just as I do. It's a lot to keep up
On Sunday 23 October 2005 21:40, Kevin Bockman wrote:
> I agree on both points. I'm not sure if anyone from Digium actually
> reads the -users lists though.
Kevin Fleming slogs through this list just as I do. It's a lot to keep up
with. Hell I think he even does it off the clock, as I do.
I d
Waldo Rubinstein wrote:
The only thing I wished was that the Digium cards worked in 3.3V and 5V
motherboards without having to specify which one you are going to
deploy it on. I got somewhat screwed on the TE410P because of that
reason :(
The warranty issue is a big difference. Why couldn'