Thank you very much for all answers.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-user
> I just got through trying to set up a Sipura 3000 and am still looking
> for answers. There is a low volume problem (caller is underwater) on
> the FXO port that I wish someone would have told me about and I would
> have gone the other route. (even after upgrading firmware and
> adjusting gai
My vote is for the Sipura as well; essentially I agree with all of
Brian's points. Those boxes work well once set up correctly. And, the
server and PSTN line doesn't even have to be close; PSTN line in
Washington, * server in Texas and a slow (as in 128 kbps) DSL
between them is sufficient.
Th
I just got through trying to set up a Sipura 3000 and am still looking
for answers. There is a low volume problem (caller is underwater) on
the FXO port that I wish someone would have told me about and I would
have gone the other route. (even after upgrading firmware and
adjusting gain settings)
On 5/26/05, Andres Paglayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am about to start building my first ever * production server and would
> be nice to have some input from the list.
My personal vote would be for the Sipura's.
Pro's -
It would make failing over to standby box much easier.
You could
Dear List,
Besides price, ~$300 against ~$200,
Is there any pros and/or cons on using one or the other approach to
provide 2 FXSs and 2 FXOs (plus 4 IP phone extensions)?
I am about to start building my first ever * production server and would
be nice to have some input from the list.
Many
