"Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c on 2.6.X"
I'm seeing this on Kernel 2.6.+ implementations, namely Centos 4.1
machines while trying to do TDMoE trunks between two machines.
2.4 Kernel operates fine on the same hardware
I'm compiling zaptel-1.0.9.2 as per instructions in README
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody have any issues running tdmoe on kernel 2.6+?
I've got Suse 9.1 + 9.2 running 2.6.5 and 2.6.8 respectively, and when I
enable dynamic spans between them, both boxes dump something similar to:
Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:141
[] local_bh_enable+0x
Anybody have any issues running tdmoe on kernel 2.6+?
I've got Suse 9.1 + 9.2 running 2.6.5 and 2.6.8 respectively, and when I
enable dynamic spans between them, both boxes dump something similar to:
Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:141
[] local_bh_enable+0x48/0x60
[] dev_queue_x
