List,
I just tried to swap out our 410 for a 411 and we started have
problems with on of our T1's.
Setup:
Span 1 - Dedicated PRI for long distance.
Span 2 - 12 channels fxs_gs outgoing local.
12 Channels em_w incoming DID's.
I didn't have any problems with the PRI. The trouble
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Rees
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 6:47 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TE411P problem
List,
I just tried to swap out our 410 for
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:03:42PM -0500, Tim Connolly wrote:
> I'm having lots of stability problems with my 411's. I'm not blaming the 411
> yet, just seems odd that I ran for months on a TE110P with a peak of 10-15
> calls, and now my box kernel panics each time it hits the same load.
> Granted,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:03:42PM -0500, Tim Connolly wrote:
> You might start by running /usr/src/zaptel/zttest. See if you stay at 100%.
> That's going to be the first thing digium checks. You might also run the
> autosupport script and take a look at it for anything obvious.
>
> I'm having lot
Hi,
Probably a stupid syntax problem.. but can't seem to make
these files work for more than the first T1 (ok, if I comment out
the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th span).
Can someone proofread this for me?
Thanks!
==
zaptel.conf
span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs
bchan=1-23
dchan=24
span=2,0,0,esf,b8zs
