Re: [Asterisk-Users] VM low volume - testers needed

2005-09-24 Thread Rich Adamson
The patch is in cvs-head, which has been very stable for me. :) Hi Richard, I am experiencing the same problem. I'd like to test your patch. Thing, is, I don't know which CVS it's in :) ... I checked out 1.2-beta on Tuesday (9/21) and compiled it. When I type

Re: [Asterisk-Users] VM low volume - testers needed

2005-09-24 Thread Brian McEntire
Hmmm... I checked out CVS-HEAD, built and installed it this morning. Most testing was going well, but then I found out the behavior of ChanIsAvail has changed (is broken?) In my Dial Plan, if a call comes in on the PSTN line, and is not answered by the extension (or if the extension is busy),

Re: [Asterisk-Users] VM low volume - testers needed

2005-09-24 Thread Julian Lyndon-Smith
Under 1.2 the +101 jumping is not enabled by default. There is a variable returned showing the status of the application. You need to add a j flag or put priorityjumping=yes in extensions.conf Julian. Brian McEntire wrote: Hmmm... I checked out CVS-HEAD, built and installed it this morning.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] VM low volume - testers needed

2005-09-24 Thread Brian McEntire
Hmm. Thanks for the heads up, but I'm not sure that's it. It's jumping to 208 rather than 209, so it looks more like an off-by-one error. I tried changing to priorityjumping=yes in /etc/asterisk/extensions.conf and reinstalled the CVS-HEAD version, but it still jumps to 208 whereas it used to

Re: [Asterisk-Users] VM low volume - testers needed

2005-09-24 Thread Brian McEntire
Oops, I didn't cc the list. Julian suggested I should try the older version of app_chanisavail.c and that worked out well. I can now use the g(#) switch and that works very well. On 9/24/05, Brian McEntire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That fixes it! Thanks. So I can run CVS HEAD but I need to check

Re: [Asterisk-Users] VM low volume - testers needed

2005-09-23 Thread Brian McEntire
Hi Richard, I am experiencing the same problem. I'd like to test your patch. Thing, is, I don't know which CVS it's in :) ... I checked out 1.2-beta on Tuesday (9/21) and compiled it. When I type 'show application voicemail', it does not describe the g(#) option, so I think my version must not

Re: [Asterisk-Users] VM low volume - testers needed

2005-09-21 Thread Patrick
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 10:38 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: For those that have experienced low VM recording volumes when using a Digium TDM04b (or similar analog pstn card), a work around has been committed to cvs-head. Does this mean that tracking down the cause of the low volume issue was not

Re: [Asterisk-Users] VM low volume - testers needed

2005-09-21 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Monday 19 September 2005 12:38, Rich Adamson wrote: The g(6) adds a 6 db gain for zap calls that end up recording a Voicemail message. ... * 'g(#)' the specified amount of gain will be requested during message recording (units are whole-number decibels (dB)) How in the hell does

Re: [Asterisk-Users] VM low volume - testers needed

2005-09-21 Thread Rich Adamson
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 10:38 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: For those that have experienced low VM recording volumes when using a Digium TDM04b (or similar analog pstn card), a work around has been committed to cvs-head. Does this mean that tracking down the cause of the low volume issue was

Re: [Asterisk-Users] VM low volume - testers needed

2005-09-21 Thread Rich Adamson
On Monday 19 September 2005 12:38, Rich Adamson wrote: The g(6) adds a 6 db gain for zap calls that end up recording a Voicemail message. ... * 'g(#)' the specified amount of gain will be requested during message recording (units are whole-number decibels (dB)) How in the

[Asterisk-Users] VM low volume - testers needed

2005-09-19 Thread Rich Adamson
For those that have experienced low VM recording volumes when using a Digium TDM04b (or similar analog pstn card), a work around has been committed to cvs-head. Need some folks to test it; it doesn't seem to work for me, but need some feedback from others to ensure the work around is actually