aparently memory didnt serve me :)
Thanks for the correction
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 08:25 -0500, The Prohacker wrote:
> I think the address is http://nanpa.com/ nanpa.org is photography
> site :)
>
>
>
> On 7/17/05, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> NANPA
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 12:15:06AM -0700, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com
wrote:
>
> In short you might investigate a phone company service blocker for
> premium service numbers and try your best to block what you can but it
> would be impossible for someone without SS7 network access to see wh
I think the address is http://nanpa.com/ nanpa.org is photography site :)
On 7/17/05, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
NANPA manages all the numbers in the north american numbering plan, ifmemory serves their page is
nanpa.org and they used to have rate centerinformat
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 00:01 -0700, Peter Hsu wrote:
> I'm concerned about people dialing out of our asterisk server to numbers
> they shouldn't be dialing.
>
> Is there a concrete algorithm for determining whether a phone number is
> "normal". i.e. calling this phone number would result in a no
I'm concerned about people dialing out of our asterisk server to numbers
they shouldn't be dialing.
Is there a concrete algorithm for determining whether a phone number is
"normal". i.e. calling this phone number would result in a normal long
distance rate.
It seems like the pattern 1NXXNXX
