Re: [Asterisk-Users] Virtual Memory Usage

2005-12-24 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 06:59:50AM -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: This is another thing: Linux tends to use the availble free memory for IO buffers, disk cache and such. So in the output of 'free', look at the second line. I'm not the OP, but for those of us that are not considered strong

[Asterisk-Users] Virtual Memory Usage

2005-12-23 Thread Christian Benke
Good Morning List! I have a instance of asterisk running since 2 weeks under relative heavy zap usage(mostly disa-customers), about 3000calls/day. last time(2 weeks ago) it had been shut down by oom-killer for some reason and since then i keep a jealous watch over the asterisk process. I know

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Virtual Memory Usage

2005-12-23 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:54:24AM +0100, Christian Benke wrote: Good Morning List! I have a instance of asterisk running since 2 weeks under relative heavy zap usage(mostly disa-customers), about 3000calls/day. last time(2 weeks ago) it had been shut down by oom-killer for some reason

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Virtual Memory Usage

2005-12-23 Thread Rich Adamson
This is another thing: Linux tends to use the availble free memory for IO buffers, disk cache and such. So in the output of 'free', look at the second line. I'm not the OP, but for those of us that are not considered strong sys admin's (but have been around and using linux since early

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Virtual Memory Usage

2005-12-23 Thread Bob Goddard
On Friday 23 Dec 2005 12:59, Rich Adamson wrote: This is another thing: Linux tends to use the availble free memory for IO buffers, disk cache and such. So in the output of 'free', look at the second line. I'm not the OP, but for those of us that are not considered strong sys admin's (but