[Asterisk-Users] Why NAT problem

2005-08-13 Thread Kamran Ahmad
hello i am using asterisk-1.0.9. i have a NAT problem. without NAT registration is ok. and if user is bhind NAT it is registring on asterisk. but SJPhone is showing not registered. i think asterisk is properly sending request to UA. any commentsthis sip.conf setting was working

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Why NAT problem

2005-08-13 Thread Rudolf Ladyzhenskii
] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 6:52 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Why NAT problem hello i am using asterisk-1.0.9. i have a NAT problem. without NAT registration is ok. and if user is bhind NAT it is registring on asterisk. but SJPhone is showing not registered. i

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Why NAT problem

2005-08-13 Thread Tom Rymes
] On Behalf Of Rudolf Ladyzhenskii Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 9:53 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Why NAT problem At firewall/NAT you have to do port forwarding. If your phone is at port 5060, NAT device will receive

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Why NAT problem

2005-08-13 Thread Tom Rymes
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Why NAT problem This is not technically true. For instance, you can take a Cisco 79X0 and put it behind NAT and it will work without port forwarding. You do, however, have to program the phone to enable the NAT

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Why NAT problem

2005-08-13 Thread Rudolf Ladyzhenskii
- Original Message - From: Tom Rymes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 12:30 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Why NAT problem As a followup to my own post, AFAIK, my comments apply