, August 31, 2004 5:31 PM
| Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zap ANSWER the Call
|
|
|
| Hi,
|
| Nobody knows about that strange behaviour of Zap channels or
| at least if is that right?
|
| Thanks in advance.
|
| Rodrigo P. Telles wrote:
| | Hi,
| |
| | I'm using a TDM400 with one FXS and one FXO module
PROTECTED]
| Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 5:31 PM
| Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zap ANSWER the Call
|
|
|
| Hi,
|
| Nobody knows about that strange behaviour of Zap channels or at
| least if is that right?
|
| Thanks in advance.
|
| Rodrigo P. Telles wrote:
| | Hi,
| |
| | I'm using a TDM400 with one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Nobody knows about that strange behaviour of Zap channels or
at least if is that right?
Thanks in advance.
Rodrigo P. Telles wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I'm using a TDM400 with one FXS and one FXO module (developer kit) and
| I've been testing termination
Discussion
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zap ANSWER the Call
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Nobody knows about that strange behaviour of Zap channels or
at least if is that right?
Thanks in advance.
Rodrigo P. Telles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm using a TDM400 with one FXS and one FXO module (developer kit) and
I've been testing termination from SIP phones to PSTN and it works fine, but
asterisk accounting is doing something strange (for me).
Scenario:
1 - extension 1009 (SIP phone -
