Re: [Asterisk-Users] ZtDummy vs Hardware

2004-12-29 Thread Rich Adamson
> > > > So, 215 - 40 - 110 = 65kbps > > > > You only have about 65kbps to spare, and all of this is based on ideal > > (theoritical) conditions. I doubt that those 12 calls will sound > > okay, or even work at all... > > > > But, you can always try! > > The thing is: how do I do that? What tool

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ZtDummy vs Hardware

2004-12-29 Thread Jean-Michel Hiver
So, 215 - 40 - 110 = 65kbps You only have about 65kbps to spare, and all of this is based on ideal (theoritical) conditions. I doubt that those 12 calls will sound okay, or even work at all... But, you can always try! The thing is: how do I do that? What tools are there to test how many chann

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ZtDummy vs Hardware

2004-12-28 Thread Steve Kann
Kristian Kielhofner wrote: Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: I was wondering what could be pros and cons of ztdummy vs proper timer device (i.e. X100P). I am going to set up an asterisk server in europe (to do trunking, to save bandwith) and I was wondering if it'll be OK to get it going with ztdummy.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ZtDummy vs Hardware

2004-12-28 Thread Jean-Michel Hiver
I would seriously doubt that you can actually squeeze 12 channels through that dsl and obtain anything reasonable for quality, regardless of which asterisk codec you choose. But, it certainly would not be that hard to test it and validate assumptions. It would be wiser to know that it has a goo

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ZtDummy vs Hardware

2004-12-28 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: I was wondering what could be pros and cons of ztdummy vs proper timer device (i.e. X100P). I am going to set up an asterisk server in europe (to do trunking, to save bandwith) and I was wondering if it'll be OK to get it going with ztdummy. Furthermore, I have only a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ZtDummy vs Hardware

2004-12-28 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On December 28, 2004 11:44 am, Rich Adamson wrote: > I would seriously doubt that you can actually squeeze 12 channels through > that dsl and obtain anything reasonable for quality, regardless of which > asterisk codec you choose. But, it certainly would not be that hard to > test it and validate a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ZtDummy vs Hardware

2004-12-28 Thread Rich Adamson
> I was wondering what could be pros and cons of ztdummy vs proper timer > device (i.e. X100P). > > I am going to set up an asterisk server in europe (to do trunking, to > save bandwith) and I was wondering if it'll be OK to get it going with > ztdummy. > > Furthermore, I have only a 1024/256

[Asterisk-Users] ZtDummy vs Hardware

2004-12-28 Thread Jean-Michel Hiver
I was wondering what could be pros and cons of ztdummy vs proper timer device (i.e. X100P). I am going to set up an asterisk server in europe (to do trunking, to save bandwith) and I was wondering if it'll be OK to get it going with ztdummy. Furthermore, I have only a 1024/256kbps PPPOE DSL l