On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Mark Spencer wrote:
It's up one directly. It just moved.
Run make in h323 then do make install on asterisk again.
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, John Fortman wrote:
What happened to chan_h323.c in the asterisk cvs? I got ast_h323.cpp,
ast_h323.h and chan_h323.h but no
.
- Original Message -
From: Sean Figgins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_h323.c
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Mark Spencer wrote:
It's up one directly. It just moved.
Run make in h323 then do make install
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_h323.c
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Mark Spencer wrote:
It's up one directly. It just moved.
Run make in h323 then do make install on asterisk again.
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, John Fortman wrote
What happened to chan_h323.c in the asterisk
cvs? I got ast_h323.cpp, ast_h323.h and chan_h323.h but no
chan_h323.c. Hence chan_h323.so was not created so no h323 support in
asterisk.
Just wondering when to expect it again because I
was stupid and didn't make a backup of the asterisk code
It's up one directly. It just moved.
Run make in h323 then do make install on asterisk again.
Mark
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, John Fortman wrote:
What happened to chan_h323.c in the asterisk cvs? I got ast_h323.cpp, ast_h323.h
and chan_h323.h but no chan_h323.c. Hence chan_h323.so was not
Hello all,
I got the following error compiling h323 support in the latest cvs. Below
the error is a diff to the file that I got to make it work. I took an
example out of sip as far as the syntax for ast_rtp_new. Not sure if it is
correct or not, but it seems to work. Please correct me if I am
