RE : [Asterisk-Users] codecs order and so on

2006-01-11 Thread Olivier Taylor
Silva Envoyé : mardi 10 janvier 2006 22:51 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [Asterisk-Users] codecs order and so on Doing in the console show translation i can see that it seems not be possible to translate from any to g729 codec, or from g729 to any. So, let

[Asterisk-Users] codecs order and so on

2006-01-10 Thread Olivier Taylor
Title: Message The problem : an asterisk box with 2 fxo First fxo just receive calls from pstn (ulaw) Second fxo receive and send call to mobile network thru a sipbox(ulaw) Calls to pstn are sent to a pstn provider accepting only g729 Internal calls doesn't care of

Re: [Asterisk-Users] codecs order and so on

2006-01-10 Thread Moises Silva
Doing in the console show translation i can see that it seems not be possible to translate from any to g729 codec, or from g729 to any. So, let me try to find a reason for this. When you have first allow=g729 (preferred codec) all the calls to pstn providers work because the phones and asterisk

Re: [Asterisk-Users] codecs order

2005-08-16 Thread Erik Versaevel
That should be controllable by a weight, for example 2 peers: A -- G729, G711 B -- G711, G729 What's currently happening is that * starts transcoding between the two (g729 for A and G711 for B), what i would like is to apply a weight to peer A so that the codec of choise at both sides becomes

Re: [Asterisk-Users] codecs order

2005-08-16 Thread Brian West
The way I said is the "gospel" of how it happens.  /bOn Aug 16, 2005, at 1:42 AM, Erik Versaevel wrote:That should be controllable by a weight, for example 2 peers: ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com

Re: [Asterisk-Users] codecs order

2005-08-16 Thread Pavel Jezek
I remember many discussions about inteligent codecs negotiation in asterisk, but seems, however, this isn't as simple to implement as it looks... :-( PJ Erik Versaevel wrote: That should be controllable by a weight, for example 2 peers: A -- G729, G711 B -- G711, G729 What's currently

Re: [Asterisk-Users] codecs order

2005-08-16 Thread Brian West
As someone that spent a week or more with anthm refactoring this code I can tell this is how it was when we were done and the code was accepted.  So I do know a bit about this area of sip and iax./bOn Aug 16, 2005, at 3:03 PM, Pavel Jezek wrote:I remember many discussions about inteligent codecs

[Asterisk-Users] codecs order

2005-08-15 Thread marek cervenka
hi, i have this topology pstn+(e1)asterisk1-asterisk2-sip client asterisk1,asterisk2 allow (g729,alaw) sip client prefer g729, then alaw can you someone describe codec negotiation when call for sip client arrive from pstn? (can i set g729 for calls from pstn? ) thanks

Re: [Asterisk-Users] codecs order

2005-08-15 Thread Pavel Jezek
Hi, asterisk will negotiate codecs for both parties independently (use sip show peer peer and look for codec order entry), so, if you have prefered codec g729 for your sip phone/peer, asterisk will use them (regardles of codec setting for other party - if codecs does not match, asterisk will

Re: [Asterisk-Users] codecs order

2005-08-15 Thread Tony Hoyle
Pavel Jezek wrote: Hi, asterisk will negotiate codecs for both parties independently (use sip show peer peer and look for codec order entry), so, if you have prefered codec g729 for your sip phone/peer, asterisk will use them (regardles of codec setting for other party - if codecs does not

Re: [Asterisk-Users] codecs order

2005-08-15 Thread Brian West
Here is an example: Call comes in via PSTN... ulaw is the native format of the channel. On the sip side you have g729,ulaw as the codec order. That call will end up being ulaw because we send the native format as our first choice above all because we don't want to transcode. /b On