[Asterisk-Users] cvs STABLE of 08/10 & gcc4 issue

2005-08-13 Thread Patrick
Hi all, I'm trying to make my cvs STABLE 08/10 srpms build properly on an updated FC4 box. When I rebuild the srpm with FC4's gcc4 I get this error: gcc -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g -Iinclude -I../include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O3 -march=

[Asterisk-Users] cvs stable with db support in extensions.conf

2005-05-10 Thread Richard
Hi, I use cvs stable version. I'd like to add database support on extensions.conf. Other config files into db would be a big bonus. Looking through the wiki, there are several ways... but not sure which one is the best or widely used and supported... ast_data and res_config seem to be the best ca

Re: [Asterisk-Users] cvs stable and 1.0.5

2005-03-02 Thread Michael George
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael George > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 7:47 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] cvs stable and 1.0.5 > > I see that 1.0.5 is out. I thought that if I am tracking cvs v1.0.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] cvs stable and 1.0.5

2005-03-02 Thread Eric Wieling
Michael George wrote: I see that 1.0.5 is out. I thought that if I am tracking cvs v1.0.x I would always get the newest releases. However, I just did a fresh update and install from cvs stable and it reports as only being v1.0.3. Should I just be using the tarballs rather than the cvs -r 1_0? Or

Re: [Asterisk-Users] cvs stable and 1.0.5

2005-03-02 Thread Peter Bowyer
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 07:46:33 -0500, Michael George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see that 1.0.5 is out. I thought that if I am tracking cvs v1.0.x I would > always get the newest releases. However, I just did a fresh update and > install from cvs stable and it reports as only being v1.0.3. Actua

RE: [Asterisk-Users] cvs stable and 1.0.5

2005-03-02 Thread Clay Reiche
Are you sure you're not looking at the date? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael George Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 7:47 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] cvs stable and 1.0.5 I see that 1.0

[Asterisk-Users] cvs stable and 1.0.5

2005-03-02 Thread Michael George
I see that 1.0.5 is out. I thought that if I am tracking cvs v1.0.x I would always get the newest releases. However, I just did a fresh update and install from cvs stable and it reports as only being v1.0.3. Should I just be using the tarballs rather than the cvs -r 1_0? Or maybe my initial cvs

Re: [Asterisk-Users] cvs stable

2004-09-21 Thread Andrew Thompson
Michael Bielicki wrote: Stable seized to exist quite some time ago. To expand on Michael's answer, stable wasn't being kept up to date like it should have been, so the statement "get the latest stable version" became "get the latest cvs version" as the standard answer for resolving people's iss

Re: [Asterisk-Users] cvs stable

2004-09-21 Thread Michael Bielicki
Stable seized to exist quite some time ago. On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:35:28 +0500, Atif Rasheed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on the asterisk site, it was stated while ago, how to download stable > version. like > cvs checkout -r v1-0_stable asterisk-addons zaptel libpri > > but now it's not their.

[Asterisk-Users] cvs stable

2004-09-14 Thread Atif Rasheed
on the asterisk site, it was stated while ago, how to download stable version. like cvs checkout -r v1-0_stable asterisk-addons zaptel libpri but now it's not their. is stable-version removed from the CVS ? or is their some different procedure ? thank you -- Atif ___