[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just tried the patch you made with the latest CVS and it patches
fine
> although it does not work. Now when I hit # it does not send the
DTMF
> to the other side at all. Although hitting ## does get the
transfer.
> Now # doesn't do ANYTHING :)
I'm not sure why that is
Just tried the patch you made with the latest CVS and it patches fine
although it does not work. Now when I hit # it does not send the DTMF
to the other side at all. Although hitting ## does get the transfer.
Now # doesn't do ANYTHING :)
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:00:38 -0500, Barton Hodges
<[EMA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> is there a doublehash patch for 1.0.1?
> o old one to res_parking.c does not apply as there is no longer
> res_parking.c o wiki search is useless
> o google only finds the problems applying old patch to 0.7
I've attached an old-school, no frills, double-hash patch
nt: Saturday, October 23, 2004 1:39 PM
> To: splatters
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1
>
> and the patch take19.txt in bug 0002010 does not apply cleanly
> to the freebsd port of 1.0.1
>
> randy
>
> ___
and the patch take19.txt in bug 0002010 does not apply cleanly
to the freebsd port of 1.0.1
randy
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http:/
t: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1
>
> is there a doublehash patch for 1.0.1?
> o old one to res_parking.c does not apply as there is no longer
> res_parking.c
> o wiki search is useless
> o google only finds the problems applying old
is there a doublehash patch for 1.0.1?
o old one to res_parking.c does not apply as there is no longer
res_parking.c
o wiki search is useless
o google only finds the problems applying old patch to 0.7
thanks
randy
___
Asterisk-Users mailing l
