On 8/22/2022 11:16 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
> Is there any way to find out the values of variables set in the [General]
> section of extensions.conf from the Asterisk CLI
No. You could use the `!` command to less or cat extensions.conf, but there is
no built-in command for it.
Kind regards,
On Monday 22 August 2022 at 18:55:08, List Support wrote:
> Hi
>
> Le 22/08/2022 à 17:16, Antony Stone a écrit :
> > Hi.
> >
> > Is there any way to find out the values of variables set in the [General]
> > section of extensions.conf from the Asterisk CLI (not from inside the
> > dialplan, I
Hi.
Is there any way to find out the values of variables set in the [General]
section of extensions.conf from the Asterisk CLI (not from inside the
dialplan, I just mean at the "hostname*CLI>" prompt)?
https://www.voip-info.org/asterisk-dialplan-general/
Thanks,
Antony.
--
If you can
If you're executing /usr/bin/rm directly, shell aliases will have no effect.
On 1/11/22 11:29, Antony Stone wrote:
On Tuesday 11 January 2022 at 17:20:44, Michael Englehorn wrote:
If you're on RHEL or CentOS or one of its descendants,
Oh, now that reminds me that those systems also tend to
On Tuesday 11 January 2022 at 17:20:44, Michael Englehorn wrote:
> If you're on RHEL or CentOS or one of its descendants,
Oh, now that reminds me that those systems also tend to alias "rm" to "rm -i",
so they won't delete files without confirmation.
Irritating in general IMHO, but it might be
If you're on RHEL or CentOS or one of its descendants, I would check if SELinux
is enforcing (`sestatus` or `cat /etc/selinux/config` and look for
"SELINUX=enforcing"), if it is, you'll probably need to create a policy to
allow the Asterisk context to execute rm and/or delete files.
I use
On Monday 10 January 2022 at 20:03:55, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am trying to run this command:
> exten => _4XX,n,System(/usr/bin/rm /tmp/test.incoming.txt)
>
> From the log:
> Executing [402@smvoice-sip:7] System("SIP/103-0018", "/usr/bin/rm
> /tmp/test.incoming.txt") in new stack
>
>
> Is
I am trying to run this command:
exten => _4XX,n,System(/usr/bin/rm /tmp/test.incoming.txt)
>From the log:
Executing [402@smvoice-sip:7] System("SIP/103-0018", "/usr/bin/rm
/tmp/test.incoming.txt") in new stack
Is "rm" not an allowed command - the above file is not removed.
-rw-rw-rw- 1
On Monday 11 February 2019 at 14:14:16, Susan Ruiz wrote:
> how to configure sip did from with asterisk?
1. Create a trunk in sip.conf, tell it the context to send calls to.
2. Create that context in extensions.conf, telling it how you want to handle
the calls.
If you need further details or
how to configure sip did from with asterisk?
Regards,
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/
New to Asterisk?
I am trying to make sure my DID and SIP account details are working
properly and engaging the extensions.conf and dial plan.
I have a successful SIP session registered:
Connected to Asterisk 11.3.0 currently running on Asterisk (pid = 922)
Asterisk*CLI sip show registry
Host
On Monday 08 April 2013, Thomas Perron wrote:
I am trying to make sure my DID and SIP account details are working
properly and engaging the extensions.conf and dial plan.
I have a successful SIP session registered:
Connected to Asterisk 11.3.0 currently running on Asterisk (pid = 922)
I am trying to make sure my DID and SIP account details are working
properly and engaging the extensions.conf and dial plan.
I have a successful SIP session registered:
Connected to Asterisk 11.3.0 currently running on Asterisk (pid = 922)
Asterisk*CLI sip show registry
Host
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:26 PM, A J Stiles asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.ukwrote:
On Monday 08 April 2013, Thomas Perron wrote:
I am trying to make sure my DID and SIP account details are working
properly and engaging the extensions.conf and dial plan.
I have a successful SIP session
I don't think s extension will work on SIP channel. s extension is a
catch-all extension for Analog calls
Console output would be useful.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Thomas Perron wrote:
I am trying to make sure my DID and SIP account details are working
properly and engaging the extensions.conf and dial plan.
If you jack up logging, you may see a message on the console like:
looking for x in y
where x is the extension and y
hi, All
one thing confused me a long time.
when i change the extensions.conf file. why not take effects after
restart the asterisk? details as follow:
my dailplan is :
[95040]
exten = _95040X,1,Set(CALLINNUM=${CALLERID(dnid)})
exten = _95040X,n(start),Answer
exten =
check the Goto cmd syntax
2010/3/10 Zhang Shukun bit...@gmail.com
hi, All
one thing confused me a long time.
when i change the extensions.conf file. why not take effects after
restart the asterisk? details as follow:
my dailplan is :
[95040]
exten =
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Zhang Shukun bit...@gmail.com wrote:
hi, All
one thing confused me a long time.
when i change the extensions.conf file. why not take effects after
restart the asterisk? details as follow:
Type dialplan reload in your CLI
--
.
_
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Emanuele
Carbone
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:57 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Extensions.conf changed but not take effect
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Zhang Shukun bit...@gmail.com wrote:
[95040]
exten = _95040X,1,Set(CALLINNUM=${CALLERID(dnid)})
exten = _95040X,n(start),Answer
exten = _95040X,n(welcome),Background(${welcomefile},,123)
...
exten = i,1,Playback(invalid)
exten =
exten = _95040X,1,Set(CALLINNUM=${CALLERID(dnid)})
Try setting CALLINNUM to ${EXTEN}.
exten = _95040X,1,Set(CALLINNUM=${EXTEN}).
CALLERID(num) instead of CALLINNUM (which is 100% wrong)
--
_
-- Bandwidth and
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Philipp von Klitzing
klitz...@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
exten = _95040X,1,Set(CALLINNUM=${CALLERID(dnid)})
Try setting CALLINNUM to ${EXTEN}.
exten = _95040X,1,Set(CALLINNUM=${EXTEN}).
CALLERID(num) instead of CALLINNUM (which is
CALLERID(num) instead of CALLINNUM (which is 100% wrong)
How is it wrong if he's creating his own variable named CALLINNUM?
Maybe you are right, it just looked to me like a typo in for the old and
deprecated ${CALLERIDNUM}.
Philipp
--
Of Vincent
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 9:50 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] [extensions.conf] Any idea why not working as
itshould?
Hello
I noticed a small bug in the way my extensions.conf work:
Users can choose extensions 1-4 or 9 to tell why they're
Hello
I noticed a small bug in the way my extensions.conf work:
Users can choose extensions 1-4 or 9 to tell why they're calling, and
I'll send an e-mail to the person(s) to whom is involved. Extension 4
is actually for personal messages for User1, and extension 9 is for
everyone (User1, User2,
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Vincent
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 9:50 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] [extensions.conf] Any idea why not working as
itshould?
Hello
I noticed a small bug in the way my extensions.conf work:
Users
Hi, all. I've got app_rxfax going and nicely receiving a fax, which I
then throw to a script, and have it convert it to a PDF and mail it.
Works great... a lot of the time. But a fair bit of the time, rxfax
throws errors, and extensions.conf seems never to invoke my script. Here
are the
Of Ken D'Ambrosio
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:03 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] extensions.conf -- what to do when command
throwserrors?
Hi, all. I've got app_rxfax going and nicely receiving a fax, which I
then throw to a script, and have it convert
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
Hi, all. I've got app_rxfax going and nicely receiving a fax, which I
then throw to a script, and have it convert it to a PDF and mail it.
Works great... a lot of the time. But a fair bit of the time, rxfax
throws errors, and extensions.conf seems
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ken D'Ambrosio
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:03 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] extensions.conf -- what to do when command
throwserrors?
Hi, all. I've got app_rxfax going and nicely receiving a fax
Hey, all. I haven't really gotten deep into Asterisk since 1.0.x, and I'm
afraid I've forgotten a fair bit. One big thing that I've forgotten is
the syntax, etc., for extensions.conf. Where do I find that? I'm looking
for stuff about commands, syntax for commands, variables, etc. Is there a
Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
Hey, all. I haven't really gotten deep into Asterisk since 1.0.x, and I'm
afraid I've forgotten a fair bit. One big thing that I've forgotten is
the syntax, etc., for extensions.conf. Where do I find that? I'm looking
for stuff about commands, syntax for commands,
A cheaper alternative would be the voip wiki.
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20config%20extensions.conf
_
Darren Sessions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.darrensessions.com
_
On Sep 4, 2008, at 12:13 PM, Mark
A cheaper alternative would be the voip wiki.
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-
index.php?page=Asterisk%20config%20extensions.conf
Unfortunately, as advised by other asterisk users,
http://www.voip-info.org is sometimes really not that up-to-date.
However, that does not mean that we should give
hello all,
im looking for a way to do the following:
when a SPECIFIC call comes through to asterisk through sip, i want it to b
directed to a pool of specific sip extensions (9 extensions) where asterisk
tries one after the other till lhe finds one of them thats actually on.i want
to add a
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:09 AM, RoLaNd RoLaNd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello all,
im looking for a way to do the following:
when a SPECIFIC call comes through to asterisk through sip, i want it to b
directed to a pool of specific sip extensions (9 extensions) where asterisk
tries one
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:03:30PM -0600, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
I'm not a fan of using the Wiki as a reference, but there really isn't
any info like this in the docs that come with Asterisk.
Agreed, except to note that the explanations given in Asterisk: The Future of
Telephony serve
The following two wiki pages explain it much better than I could.
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+Dialplan+Patterns
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+Extension+Matching
I'm not a fan of using the Wiki as a reference, but there really isn't
any info like this in
On 10/20/07, Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've never built an IVR before, so I was wondering if someone
could share some code from their extensions.conf that would perform
some of thoses steps:
Try Google for asterisk ivr
The first ten sites that come up, including voip-info.org,
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:06:00 +0200, randulo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The first ten sites that come up, including voip-info.org, usually a
good place to look first, each have full examples. Look also for the
background application wich is used to play the file, get input and
jump to the extension
On 10/22/07, Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008 might be a good year to update * - The future of telephony :-)
Version 2 of TFOT was just released a few weeks ago...
http://downloads.oreilly.com/books/9780596510480.pdf
--
Erik Anderson
http://andersonfam.org
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:41:19 -0500, Erik Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Version 2 of TFOT was just released a few weeks ago...
Just had to ask :-) Thanks.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:37:56 +0100, Alan Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Look back a few hours in this mailing list for the message called
IAX2: Incoming calls answered prematurely [RESOLVED].
I have included most of how I setup a simple IVR. It wasn't that hard to
do and I have only been
Vincent wrote:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:37:56 +0100, Alan Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Look back a few hours in this mailing list for the message called
IAX2: Incoming calls answered prematurely[RESOLVED].
I have included most of how I setup a simple IVR. It wasn't that hard to
do and
Vincent wrote:
Hello
I've never built an IVR before, so I was wondering if someone
could share some code from their extensions.conf that would perform
some of thoses steps:
snip /
Hi Vincent.
Look back a few hours in this mailing list for the message called
IAX2: Incoming calls
Hello
I've never built an IVR before, so I was wondering if someone
could share some code from their extensions.conf that would perform
some of thoses steps:
1. When a call comes in from the TDM FXO port, answer
2. If no CID, play message No CID available. Please type the number
where
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 04 October 2007 07:07:47 Barzilai Spinak wrote:
All this discussion is pointless. As pointless as the discussion of
assembly versus high-level languages decades ago.
As one of the main architects, I don't
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 09:17 +, Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 04 October 2007 07:07:47 Barzilai Spinak wrote:
All this discussion is pointless. As pointless as the discussion of
assembly versus high-level
I just got the 2nd edition Asterisk book from O'Reilly, and was
surprised
to find nothing in there about AEL, except a mention of extensions.ael
on
page 471.
This is too bad. A preliminary chapter, an intro into AEL, why it's
valuable, etc. would have been very welcome. Even an appendix of
Michael Collins wrote:
I just got the 2nd edition Asterisk book from O'Reilly, and was
surprised
to find nothing in there about AEL, except a mention of extensions.ael
on
page 471.
This is too bad. A preliminary chapter, an intro into AEL, why it's
valuable, etc. would have been very
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 09:17 +, Tony Mountifield wrote:
I just got the 2nd edition Asterisk book from O'Reilly, and was surprised
to find nothing in there about AEL, except a mention of extensions.ael on
page 471.
That's because we were rushed on the book, and none of the authors has
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 08:40 -0700, Michael Collins wrote:
This is too bad. A preliminary chapter, an intro into AEL, why it's
valuable, etc. would have been very welcome. Even an appendix of a few
pages with examples and references to on-line documentation would have
been helpful. I don't
You know, you don't have to wait for the 3rd edition... you could
always
write something yourself and post it on the web, or join the (mostly
dormant, unfortunately) Asterisk Documentation Project. :-)
-Jared
Well, I could, if I _could_! :) I was hoping to learn AEL from the new
book... my
All this discussion is pointless. As pointless as the discussion of
assembly versus high-level languages decades ago.
Except most people rooting for extension.conf don't even have the
technical and conceptual amplitude to understand what they are talking
about... they just want some telephony
On Thursday 04 October 2007 07:07:47 Barzilai Spinak wrote:
All this discussion is pointless. As pointless as the discussion of
assembly versus high-level languages decades ago.
As one of the main architects, I don't find this discussion pointless. My
personal opinion of AEL is that it's
In my opinion the dialplan isn't where that logic belongs.
/b
On Oct 3, 2007, at 12:32 AM, Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
I see that most people are using the extensions.conf syntax (most
of the
examples and questions here use that syntax). recently
Where would you suggest all the logic goes Brian?
Garth
Garth van Sittert
BSc (Physics Computer Science)
-
Main: 08600 BITCO
Phone: +27 (0)11 875 6900
Fax:+27 (0)11 875 6901
Mobile: +27 (0)83 791 6662
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:
You have various scripting languages things like that can go in!
/b
On Oct 3, 2007, at 4:12 AM, Garth van Sittert wrote:
Where would you suggest all the logic goes Brian?
Garth
Garth van Sittert
BSc (Physics Computer Science)
-
Main: 08600 BITCO
Phone: +27 (0)11 875
Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444 wrote:
Hello,
I see that most people are using the extensions.conf syntax (most of the
examples and questions here use that syntax). recently I've translated all my
dial plan to AEL syntax and I find it much easier, especially when you need
IFs.
Why
Lee Jenkins wrote:
Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444 wrote:
Hello,
I see that most people are using the extensions.conf syntax (most of the
examples and questions here use that syntax). recently I've translated all my
dial plan to AEL syntax and I find it much easier, especially when
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: 3. oktober 2007 15:18
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] extensions.conf vs. AEL
You have various scripting languages things like that can go
Let us not forget that AEL cannot be stored in a database therefore
rendering you unable to utilize realtime.
AEL converted into standard extensions.conf syntax in the dialplan.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
On Oct 3, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Jon Schøpzinsky wrote:
Wouldnt that take a very large portion of datapower, to startup the
parsers and such, instead of having the whole dialplan natively in
Asterisk.
We always try to do as much as possible in dialplan, so that we are
not reliant on external
Lee Jenkins wrote:
Why most people don't use it? Am I missing something?
I think it looks too much like C.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Let us not forget that AEL cannot be stored in a database therefore
rendering you unable to utilize realtime.
AEL converted into standard extensions.conf syntax in the dialplan.
Doesn't this render having used AEL pointless?
--
Thank you and have a
Its just a different way to express the same thing in a more fluid way.
/b
On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Anthony Francis wrote:
Doesn't this render having used AEL pointless?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
To each his own. I like the flat files personally, they are more fluid
to me.
Thanks,
Steve
Brian West wrote:
Its just a different way to express the same thing in a more fluid way.
/b
On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Anthony Francis wrote:
Doesn't this render having used AEL pointless?
I'm growing fond of XML.
/b
On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Steve Totaro wrote:
To each his own. I like the flat files personally, they are more
fluid
to me.
Thanks,
Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 09:33 -0600, Anthony Francis wrote:
Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Let us not forget that AEL cannot be stored in a database therefore
rendering you unable to utilize realtime.
AEL converted into standard extensions.conf syntax in the dialplan.
Hello,
I see that most people are using the extensions.conf syntax (most of the
examples and questions here use that syntax). recently I've translated all my
dial plan to AEL syntax and I find it much easier, especially when you need
IFs.
Why most people don't use it? Am I missing
Greetings list,
A quick question regarding extensions.conf #include behaviour if I may. I'm
sure someone will know the answer off the top of their head...
How does asterisk handle overloading of contexts. For example, say an
extension exists in extensions.conf as follows:
[incoming]
some
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:56:18AM +0100, Chris Bagnall wrote:
Greetings list,
A quick question regarding extensions.conf #include behaviour if I may. I'm
sure someone will know the answer off the top of their head...
How does asterisk handle overloading of contexts. For example, say an
Hello @List,
i'm using a Cisco 7970 / 7914 phone with Asterisk 1.4 sccp
part of my sccp.conf
type= 7914 (Cisco 7970 with 7914 phone extension)
autologin = 117
description = Test
speeddial = 10,Test (10),[EMAIL PROTECTED]
my speeddial line is for internal call
On 23:32, Wed 28 Feb 07, Daniel Schlager wrote:
Hello @List,
i'm using a Cisco 7970 / 7914 phone with Asterisk 1.4 sccp
part of my sccp.conf
type = 7914 (Cisco 7970 with 7914 phone extension)
autologin = 117
description = Test
speeddial = 10,Test (10),[EMAIL
Hello,
I got a little interogation about these 3 points.
I want to write something like this sample in my extension.conf. I have
tested and it works but I don't know if it is a good way to make a menu.
I don't want to put number as it is boring to maintain.
Does anyone know if there is some
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 03:55:45PM +0100, Marco Mouta wrote:
[invalid]
exten = _X!,1,Answer()
exten = _X!,2,Background(pbx-invalid)
Are you sure that your invalid context is correctly written?
I've never heard about this pattern match _X!
As far as i know the wild card
[invalid] exten = _X!,1,Answer() exten = _X!,2,Background(pbx-invalid)Are you sure that your invalid context is correctly written?I've never heard about this pattern match _X!As far as i know the wild card is the .
So your invalid context should be: [invalid]exten = _X.,1,Answer()
exten =
Not having a [globals] section (even if it is empty) has caused Asterisk
to screw things up in the past. I think it causes contexts to not be found.
Brian Candler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:44:07AM -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
You need the [general] and [global] sections
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 15:05 +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
I have an anomoly that I am unable to explain.
...
[invalid]
exten = _X!,1,Answer()
exten = _X!,2,Background(pbx-invalid)
[test]
exten = 611,1,Answer()
exten = 611,2,Playback(hello-world)
exten = 611,3,Hangup()
[internal]
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:49:00PM +0200, Michael Neuhauser wrote:
The order of include statements is important in 1.2, I don't know if
this still holds for trunk/1.4. Could you please try to include the
'invalid' context as the last one (i.e., AFTER include = test, not
before) in both
Hello,
I have an anomoly that I am unable to explain.
My entire extensions.conf is attached. You can see that the [from-sip] and
[internal] dial plans are identical, each including 4 other contexts in the
same order:
[internal]
include = extensions
include = outbound
include = invalid
include =
Brian Candler wrote:
Hello,
I have an anomoly that I am unable to explain.
My entire extensions.conf is attached. You can see that the [from-sip] and
[internal] dial plans are identical, each including 4 other contexts in the
same order:
[internal]
include = extensions
include = outbound
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:44:07AM -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
You need the [general] and [global] sections
Well, if you read the attachment, you would see that I had a [general]
section:
[general]
autofallthrough=no
In what way would adding an empty [global] section alter the anomoly
Hi all,
Does anyone have any tips on how I would
accomplish a plan where if a user dials 4 digits, then prefix 6 digits, then if
there is a local extension configured for that number dial it, otherwise send
it out another sip gateway ( my pstn gateway)?
Perhaps more specifically, are
I think asterisk will take care of this for you. Asterisk will take the most complete match in a pattern match. For example if you have a local extension 1234567890 and a pattern match _XX then Asterisk will match the 1234567890 to the exact match if it exist, if not then it will got the
On 7/18/06, Jerry Bonner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone have any tips on how I would accomplish a plan where if a user dials 4 digits, then prefix 6 digits, then if there is a local extension configured for that number dial it, otherwise send it out another sip gateway ( my pstn
Hi
Does anyone know how big extensions.conf can be?
I am trying to set up Asterisk which will have about 45 000 lines in
extensions.conf. Is there any limitation about the amount of lines in that file?
Cheers
Andrutto
--
No limit in code imposed. Not sure about performance penalty for a
file that big, have you considered using ARA (Asterisk Realtime
Architecture)?
On 13 Jun 2006 21:06:52 +0200, andrutto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Does anyone know how big extensions.conf can be?
I am trying to set up Asterisk
-Original Message-
From: Moises Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 1:46 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] extensions.conf
No limit in code imposed. Not sure about performance penalty for a
file
Douglas Garstang a écrit :
-Original Message-
From: Moises Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 1:46 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] extensions.conf
No limit in code imposed. Not sure about
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 00:50 +0400, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
Actually i've done 50,000+ line dialplans using my Asterisk::LCR
dialplan generator, and asterisk has been just fine with it.
I have you beat, I have done over 500k when loading my country list that
I no longer maintain which is now
Hi all
I'm trying to understand what the switch = statement in the extension plan
exactly does.
Unfortunately it seams to be very badly documented. There's allmos noting
about it in o'Reilly's Asterisk Book. Nothing in the shipped /doc, nothing on
voip-info.org.
Even with google I found ony
Can someone tell me why the following from extensions.conf generates this error
on asterisk load?
Jan 13 09:27:24 WARNING[31701]: config.c:938 ast_config_internal_load: Maximum
Include level (10) exceeded
As far as I can tell I don't have a DEPTH of 10 includes. I certainly have more
than 10
increased this limit?
I'm flabbergasted. Please, someone tell me I have got this all wrong.
Doug.
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Garstang
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 4:46 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Extensions.conf error
On Saturday 14 January 2006 13:07, Douglas Garstang wrote:
This therefore means that is a maximum of 9 #include statements that can be
put into extensions.conf. This is a SERIOUS SERIOUS (how many times can I
say it?) limitation. I thought Digium said that Asterisk was supposed to be
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Extensions.conf error - 'Maximum Include
level(10) exceeded'
Can someone tell me why the following from extensions.conf generates this error
on asterisk load?
Jan 13 09:27:24 WARNING[31701]: config.c:938
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Extensions.conf error - 'MaximumInclude
level(10) exceeded'
I have heaps of includes. The limitation is not to the Extensions.conf
file, but rather each CONTEXT within the Extensions.conf file.
Its
Hello,
I have been trying to setup a Voxee Sip termination. If anyone has
extensions.conf different than Voxee suggestion.
Can you please send me a copy?
Thanks!
Jerry
Voxee web site advises to use:
[voxee]
exten = _1NXXNXX,1,Dial,SIP/${EXTEN}voxee
exten = _1NXXNXX,2,Hangup
exten
Dear Asterisk users,
I was wondering if anybody can tell me how to define a dial scheeme such
that an incomming all first rings for e.g. 20 seconds on one set of
phones and then after this time extends it's range onto a bigger set of
phones.
Basically, this is easy,
I can do this in the
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
