[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C F
> Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 7:04 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] nat=yes and qualify=yes viable NAT
> solutions?
>
> Sipura works, I never tried linksys, Polycom might
-Users] nat=yes and qualify=yes viable NAT
solutions?
Sipura works, I never tried linksys, Polycom might and might not work.
On 2/26/06, Damon Estep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Looking for some feedback on whether nat=yes and qualify=yes will
provide a
> workable s
Sipura works, I never tried linksys, Polycom might and might not work.
On 2/26/06, Damon Estep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Looking for some feedback on whether nat=yes and qualify=yes will provide a
> workable solution in many cases?
>
>
>
> The * server is on a public address, no NAT, the
Looking for some feedback on whether nat=yes and qualify=yes
will provide a workable solution in many cases?
The * server is on a public address, no NAT, the UAs (sipura,
linksys, polycom) are behind various types of NAT.
Obviously port mapping in the NAT device works, but what
abou
