Re: [Asterisk-Users] question about zttest

2006-01-20 Thread Mojo with Horan Company, LLC
My prior box would do this too, with exactly 99.987793 almost every time as you saw. It only had a wildcard, x100p. actually, clone maybe. The other notable difference is that I see you're using apic. have you tried with the noapic kernel option to see if that changes your results?

Re: [Asterisk-Users] question about zttest

2006-01-17 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:00:28PM -0500, Carlos Alperin wrote: Another request make me test my t1 card, which has no quality problems, but all that I get is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.2.1]# ./zttest Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.987793% 99.987793%

RE: [Asterisk-Users] question about zttest

2006-01-17 Thread Carlos Alperin
Yes, But I'm reading on the opposite side, or always I loose 1 sample? [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.2.1]# ./zttest -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8191 sample

[Asterisk-Users] question about zttest

2006-01-16 Thread Carlos Alperin
Another request make me test my t1 card, which has no quality problems, but all that I get is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.2.1]# ./zttest Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793%

Re: [Asterisk-Users] question about zttest

2006-01-16 Thread Kevin Bockman
Carlos Alperin wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.2.1]# ./zttest Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% 99.987793% Is anything wrong about this? I never get 100.00 % most of the times. No problem there.