Re: [Asterisk-Users] request for clarification on Asterisk T.38 bounty

2005-08-11 Thread Rosario Pingaro
Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 8:40 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] request for clarification on Asterisk T.38 bounty Adam Megacz wrote: The bounty stands at $5,500. I'm seriously considering taking a shot at it if I can find a decent T.38 provider to test

[Asterisk-Users] request for clarification on Asterisk T.38 bounty

2005-08-07 Thread Adam Megacz
The bounty stands at $5,500. I'm seriously considering taking a shot at it if I can find a decent T.38 provider to test with (I'm still hoping for reliable PAYG T.38). It looks like a lot of very smart people have done a lot of very hard work (t38modem, spandsp) that would go towards getting

Re: [Asterisk-Users] request for clarification on Asterisk T.38 bounty

2005-08-07 Thread Steve Underwood
Adam Megacz wrote: The bounty stands at $5,500. I'm seriously considering taking a shot at it if I can find a decent T.38 provider to test with (I'm still hoping for reliable PAYG T.38). It looks like a lot of very smart people have done a lot of very hard work (t38modem, spandsp) that would

Re: [Asterisk-Users] request for clarification on Asterisk T.38 bounty

2005-08-07 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Steve Underwood wrote: produce anything more than a botch for it. A couple of people have said they are reworking sip.c to make the addition of new codecs, transports, etc. and their renegotiation function smoothly. I haven't seen any results so far. I did only minimal work on sip.c in the