actually speak "fax".
Does anyone have any ideas about debugging SpanDSP?
- Original Message - From: "Peter Svensson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 6:28 PM
Subject
ap/1-1
-- Hungup 'Zap/1-1'
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Svensson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SpanDSP - Still can't
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Rod Bacon wrote:
> My understanding is that this is only required when using it inside a
> dialplan. Eg, the extension answers, then switches to fax originator mode.
No. To quote the mail from Steve Underwood:
"Many people have it working that way. Very few people use it fo
- Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SpanDSP - Still can't send
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Rod Bacon wrote:
No matter which version of SpanDSP I use, with which version of libtiff,
Asterisk, ... I simply cannot send faxes.
Did
nt: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 8:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SpanDSP - Still can't send
> BTW what versions of libtiff & spandsp u using, cuz i can't recieve
> faxes at all.
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> As
BTW what versions of libtiff & spandsp u using, cuz i can't recieve
faxes at all.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lis
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Rod Bacon wrote:
> No matter which version of SpanDSP I use, with which version of libtiff,
> Asterisk, ... I simply cannot send faxes.
Did you remember to add the "caller" option to txfax?
Peter
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
I have googled until blie in the face, WiKi'd until physically exhausted
and searched through every Asterisk repository that I can find, all to
no avail...
No matter which version of SpanDSP I use, with which version of libtiff,
Asterisk, ... I simply cannot send faxes.
I can receive faxes *pe
Good day all
I want to know with version of spandsp works well with ether asterisk
1.0.3 or 1.0.5
Thanks
Altus
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or updat
Good day all
I have a asterisk installation,1.0.3, and spandsp.
I got asterisk working,I edited the make file myself.
Now when I receive a fax I only get half a page or nothing
any Ideas why
Please let me know
Altus
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asteri
Can anyone help me with this issue? I would greatly any help that can
be provided in resolving this issue.
-Brian
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 at 14:46 Brian S. Adelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have compiled the latest version of spandsp (spandsp-0.0.2pre10)
> against todays CVS head, and I am una
I've gone through about 5 computers and two linux distros (wbel and fc3)
trying to get a system that doesn't show symptoms of frame slips, can
receive faxes, and doesn't show CPU spikes with the tdm400p active.
Unfortunately I haven't had much luck.
I asked Digium whether there was a recommended h
On 2005.01.18 08:02 Nir Simionovich wrote:
Well,
Nothing much, so I upped the logger.conf to include debug in
messages log,
in addition, here is the tiffinfo of the file I want to fax:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# tiffinfo /tmp/image.tiff
TIFF Directory at offset 0x433a
Subfile Type: (0 = 0x0)
Im
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Underwood
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 4:10 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp and app_txfax
Hi Nir,
Not usually. What does the * log
c Fax machines ?
Nir S
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Underwood
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 2:26 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp and app_txfax
Did you put txf
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Underwood
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 2:26 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp and app_txfax
Did you put txfax in caller mode with the "|caller" parameter?
Regards,
Steve
Nir Si
Well,
No, but I'll try now.
Nir S
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Underwood
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 2:26 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp and app_
Did you put txfax in caller mode with the "|caller" parameter?
Regards,
Steve
Nir Simionovich wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, I've been bashing my head for a few hours now on this, trying to
figure out if I've
done something wrong, but everything seems to me hunky-dory. So here's
the deal:
1. I've co
Hi
all,
Ok,
I've been bashing my head for a few hours now on this, trying to figure out if
I've
done something wrong, but everything seems to me hunky-dory. So here's the
deal:
1.
I've compiled the spandsp 0.0.2pre10 source code successfully and also the
asterisk
application a
I have compiled the latest version of spandsp (spandsp-0.0.2pre10)
against todays CVS head, and I am unable to recieve any faxes inbound.
I am running Slackware with a TDM400P. The system detects the inbound
fax, but then I keep recieving:
DCS with final frame tag
In state 9
Coarse carrier fre
On January 14, 2005 08:55 pm, Steve Underwood wrote:
> If you have the source for spandsp-0.0.6 can you send it to me, please.
> I'm only up to 0.0.2pre7 :-)
:-) Sorry, I meant 0.0.2pre6.
-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On January 14, 2005 11:09 am, Matthew Boehm wrote:
check out my bug post, I have yet to recieve a successful fax using rxfax.
and I'm using newest versions of everything.
That's likely your problem. :-) I don't feel like registering Yet Another
Account just to see
On January 14, 2005 11:09 am, Matthew Boehm wrote:
> check out my bug post, I have yet to recieve a successful fax using rxfax.
> and I'm using newest versions of everything.
That's likely your problem. :-) I don't feel like registering Yet Another
Account just to see a bug report, but unless y
t: Friday, January 14, 2005 9:14 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] SpandspAnd garble incoming fax
> Hello:
>
>I have successfully install spandsp and patch asterisk with it. But
when
> I received a Fax is garble or shrink. Does any one know why???... Am using
a
> PRI T100P card to r
On January 14, 2005 10:14 am, Luis Mata wrote:
> Latest csv from asterisk,
> spandsp-0.0.1k.tar.gz
That's a very old version of spandsp.
> redhat 7.3
What is the exact version of libtiff? I find you will have strange results
with anything other than *stock* 3.5.7.
-A.
Hello:
I have successfully install spandsp and patch asterisk with it. But when
I received a Fax is garble or shrink. Does any one know why???... Am using a
PRI T100P card to receive the fax and save it to a tiff file... Any help
will be greatly appreciated. Here are the versions.
Latest csv f
"Nathan C. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I start Asterisk from the command line
> (usually, asterisk -c or asterisk -vvvcp ) I can
> receive faxes and mailtofax sends them to me OK. If I start
> the asterisk service (service asterisk start) that uses
> safe_asterisk, faxe
I've got spanDSP and Asterisk Stable using an X100p running on Fedora Core 3
but there is a curious phenomenon when I receive faxes. If I start Asterisk
from the command line (usually, asterisk -c or asterisk -vvvcp )
I can receive faxes and mailtofax sends them to me OK. If I start
Michael Welter wrote:
Steve Underwood wrote:
If your TIFF are consistently that small you probably have a TIFF
library problem. Frame slips generally give much more eratic results. If
Steve, when you say that some Canon fax machines "disconnect during
negotiation", does this negotiation happen
Steve Underwood wrote:
If your TIFF are consistently that small you probably have a TIFF
library problem. Frame slips generally give much more eratic results. If
Steve, when you say that some Canon fax machines "disconnect during
negotiation", does this negotiation happen at the end of each page
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Michael Welter wrote:
> Nils Segerdahl wrote:
>
> > I suspected frame slips. But sound quality was ok. Everything was ok.
> > Except maybe to many interrupts on the line cards.
> >
> > But when I changed my devicedriver to one that was more safe regarding
> > lost interrupts it
On Friday 07 January 2005 03:45 pm, Steve Underwood wrote:
> If your TIFF are consistently that small you probably have a TIFF
> library problem. Frame slips generally give much more eratic results. If
> you believe you have a good version of the TIFF library on your machine,
> check you don't have
Nils Segerdahl wrote:
I suspected frame slips. But sound quality was ok. Everything was ok.
Except maybe to many interrupts on the line cards.
But when I changed my devicedriver to one that was more safe regarding
lost interrupts it worked like a charm.
Device driver? TDM device driver? Would you
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Ryan wrote:
>
> >On Friday 07 January 2005 01:35 pm, Lee Howard wrote:
> >
> >Just to be clear. What I am getting is about the top inch of the fax and
> >that's all. The total size of the TIFF is ALWAYS about 3KB or less.
> >
> >
> If your TIFF are consi
Steve Underwood wrote:
If your TIFF are consistently that small you probably have a TIFF
library problem. Frame slips generally give much more eratic results. If
you believe you have a good version of the TIFF library on your machine,
check you don't have any others. A *lot* of people have told
Ryan wrote:
On Friday 07 January 2005 01:35 pm, Lee Howard wrote:
Since spandsp doesn't use ECM, what I'm about to say doesn't apply to
spandsp. If you receive truncated (versus corrupted) fax images from
spandsp, then I'm not sure what the problem would be. What I'm about
to say only applies
p you Ryan...
and thanks to others for trying.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Underwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp and
On Friday 07 January 2005 11:37 am, Nils Segerdahl wrote:
> There was a discussion on this list a short while ago on howto debug
> frameslips.
> [..]
> When I applied Florian Zumbiehls patch the problem went away.
> (The link to the patch can be found in the wiki: asterisk zaphfc)
>
> Is it a pos
> I have used an analog trunk (FXO) AND a station (FXS) both on the same card.
> I thought that it might be related to the hardware so I hooked up an old
> Brother Intellifax 9000 on the station port. Both of these attempts had the
> same problem.
>
> It is my speculation that the 'cutoff' problem
On Friday 07 January 2005 01:35 pm, Lee Howard wrote:
> Since spandsp doesn't use ECM, what I'm about to say doesn't apply to
> spandsp. If you receive truncated (versus corrupted) fax images from
> spandsp, then I'm not sure what the problem would be. What I'm about
> to say only applies to ECM-
Jeff wrote:
It is my speculation that the 'cutoff' problem was related to some type of
'line noise' and that others successfully using the spandsp code _might_ be
using T1/E1 rather than analog lines (1FL) but when I started testing using
an old Fax machine plugged into a station port with a six fo
On January 7, 2005 12:26 pm, Matthew Boehm wrote:
> > Seems to be correct, or at least image corruption from a really crappy
> > fax reception. I know I've been receiving between 30-50 faxes a day with
> > app_rxfax without issue.
>
> What versions of everything are you using? Using PRI? libti
On 2005.01.07 09:42 Jeff wrote:
It is my speculation that the 'cutoff' problem was related to some
type of
'line noise' and that others successfully using the spandsp code
_might_ be
using T1/E1 rather than analog lines (1FL) but when I started testing
using
an old Fax machine plugged into a statio
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp and app_rxfax (alternative
topic:t38modem)
> H. Did I just ask in the wrong forum, or has _nobody_ experienced
image
> corruption using app_rxfax that was NOT due
> Seems to be correct, or at least image corruption from a really crappy fax
> reception. I know I've been receiving between 30-50 faxes a day with
> app_rxfax without issue.
What versions of everything are you using? Using PRI? libtiff? spandsp?
asterisk? diagram? I can't get any faxes via r
n I get the chance.
Just thought I would chime in ;-)
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp and app_
Nils Segerdahl wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Ryan wrote:
I had the same problems using hfc cards with bristuff. (with patched
zaptel drivers).
Which zaptel patches did you use?
Thanks
--
Michael Welter
Introspect Telephony Corp.
Denver, Colorado US
+1.303.674.2575
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.introspect.com
On Friday 07 January 2005 11:24 am, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> I also note that you posted your initial message at 4:14pm, and now, less
> than 24 hours later you are expecting the entire asterisk community to have
> received your message, parsed it in the sea of other messages to the list,
> had it
On 2005.01.07 08:13 Ryan wrote:
H. Did I just ask in the wrong forum, or has _nobody_ experienced
image
corruption using app_rxfax that was NOT due to using the wrong version
of
libtiff?
Oh, you can get image corruption on any non-ECM fax, and that doesn't
have anything to do with anything oth
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Ryan wrote:
> H. Did I just ask in the wrong forum, or has _nobody_ experienced image
> corruption using app_rxfax that was NOT due to using the wrong version of
> libtiff?
>
Hello Ryan,
I have.
There was a discussion on this list a short while ago on howto debug
framesl
On January 7, 2005 11:13 am, Ryan wrote:
> H. Did I just ask in the wrong forum, or has _nobody_ experienced image
> corruption using app_rxfax that was NOT due to using the wrong version of
> libtiff?
Seems to be correct, or at least image corruption from a really crappy fax
reception. I kn
H. Did I just ask in the wrong forum, or has _nobody_ experienced image
corruption using app_rxfax that was NOT due to using the wrong version of
libtiff?
If that's the case, then my secondary approach is going to have to be:
PSTN <-> Asterisk + chan_h323 <-> t38modem + Hylafax
Is there a
Dear gods of the PBX (flattery works here, right?) -
I've been pulling my hair out trying to get Asterisk to receive and
decode a fax using spandsp and app_rxfax. It seems like it should be
working. The fax machine on the other end connects and Asterisk reports
a fax coming in. But when it's
Hi,
Steve Underwood schrieb:
Recent versions no longer require libtiff internals.
Cool!
Recent versions of Debian should have the libtiff bugs fixed. Some
people trying to work with spandsp got them in there :-)
:-) Debian packages of spandsp and app_dtmftotext, app_rxfax and
app_txfax are built
Hi,
After a hiatus of several months, I decided to try spandsp again
because it is such an excellent addition to asterisk. Using 1.0.3 and
spandsp 0.0.1k.
When I send a fax from a laptop software fax that works with every
machine I've ever had to fax to, I get something like this as staus
return
Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
spandsp builds fine on Sarge. Anybody needs debs?
It does?
I ITPed it a while ago, but placed it somewhat lower on my list when I
saw it needed libtiff internals. I have debs for sarge that depend on
libtiff3g, however I could not get it to work re
Hi,
Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
spandsp builds fine on Sarge. Anybody needs debs?
It does?
I ITPed it a while ago, but placed it somewhat lower on my list when I
saw it needed libtiff internals. I have debs for sarge that depend on
libtiff3g, however I could not get it to work reliably with the more
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 01:38:43PM +1100, Adam Goryachev wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 01:48, Steve Underwood wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > You must be using a prehistoric GCC. Before 3.0, GCC didn't understand
> > this C99 construct.
>
> Hmmm, well I have:
> gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Li
Hallo Thomas Niesel
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 22:03:05 +0100 you wrote:
> Hi Folks, hi Steve
> I get following error on loading app_rx/txfax.so:
>
> ...WARNING[10458]: loader.c:258 ast_load_resource:
> /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_rxfax.so: symbol errno,
> version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 01:48, Steve Underwood wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> You must be using a prehistoric GCC. Before 3.0, GCC didn't understand
> this C99 construct.
Hmmm, well I have:
gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.3 2.96-110)
Yeah, I know, I'm using redhat, and it is really old. I'm wait
Hi Folks, hi Steve
I get following error on loading app_rx/txfax.so:
...WARNING[10458]: loader.c:258 ast_load_resource:
/usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_rxfax.so: symbol errno,
version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6
with link time reference
Unable to load app_rxfax.so
Spandsp compiled and i
Hi Adam,
You must be using a prehistoric GCC. Before 3.0, GCC didn't understand
this C99 construct.
Regards,
Steve
Adam Goryachev wrote:
Just wondering if anyone else has managed to successfully compile
spandsp-0.0.2pre6...
I'm assuming it is working for most people, else it probably wouldn't
hav
Just wondering if anyone else has managed to successfully compile
spandsp-0.0.2pre6...
I'm assuming it is working for most people, else it probably wouldn't
have been released, and/or, other people would have had more to say
about it...
In any case, these are the errors I am getting while doing a
I get a C++ preprocessor sanity check error when trying to configure
spandsp 0.0.2pre6:
checking for dlfcn.h... yes
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp
configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
See `config.log' for more details.
Config.log:
Hi
I think Simon's comment might be correct, but Sofiane's case seems only a issue of inclusion and linking of libraries.
1. "rpm -q libtiff" does not change even after installation of new libtiff from scratch since rpm registry tree does not affect in this case, unless you compile a new RPM pa
If you really added /var/local/lib, that would eb your trouble. It
should be /usr/local/lib.
Steve
Ariel Batista wrote:
I have compiled Spandsp without any problems. I got no errors I have
also done the patch without getting any error. I have tried pre4 and
pre6 version with same problem. I got
Hi,
I use Fedora 3, and I have compilation problem of SpanDsp , when
installaing spandsp, tiff warnings and errors generated and libunicall
generate "unresolved references."
Which is the same reason why spandsp is not packaged for Debian yet. The
"p" in "tiffiop.h" means private, i.e. the t4
Hello all,
I use Fedora 3, and I have compilation
problem of SpanDsp , when installaing spandsp, tiff warnings and errors generated and libunicall generate "unresolved
references."
Is
the problem in my libtiff installation, spandsp.h or in tif_dir.h and tiffiop.h?
Are tif_dir.h and
I have compiled Spandsp without any
problems. I got no errors I have also done the patch
without getting any error. I have tried pre4 and pre6 version with
same problem. I got no errors with the ./configure make make install.
After I add the directory for /var/local/lib into the /etc/ld.so.
Hi Scott,
Watch out for spandsp-0.0.2pre7 :-)
Seriously, I found the same issue while testing for x86-64 machines this
week. spandsp is now working on a x86-64, but I haven't tidied up and
released an updated version yet. That should happen this weekend. I hope
this updated version will build cl
Hello all:
In a quest to resolve the last apparent timing problems I am having
with SpanDSP I am trying out some PPC hardware, specifically a B&W G3.
I am running gentoo-ppc on this system and have compiled spandsp
0.0.2pre6 along with a release version of asterisk. Zaptel device
(T100P) is confi
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 16:23 +0100, Dave Cotton wrote:
> It looks like libtiff on certain distributions, certainly Mandrake
> Cooker, is broken. I went through a lot of testing with Steve to get
> faxes received properly and found that Mandrake had not applied a patch
> highlighted on the Hylafax p
e one that the
mime-construct perlscript sends you and you'll see whats needs changing.
Craig
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Rees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, Nove
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 08:44 -0600, Eric Rees wrote:
> I have spandsp installed and working, but when it emails using Scotts
> mailfax, the attachment is a dat file. I tried to rename the file to
> .tiff or .pdf, but it will not open. In the /var/spool/asterisk/fax
> folder, that faxes are there a
I have spandsp installed and working, but when it emails using Scotts
mailfax, the attachment is a dat file. I tried to rename the file to
.tiff or .pdf, but it will not open. In the /var/spool/asterisk/fax
folder, that faxes are there as tiffs, and I can open those without any
trouble. The prob
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 9:18 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Spandsp and Asterisk
I did tha
1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk/apps'
make: *** [subdirs] Error 1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peer
Oliver Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:49 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discuss
ehalf Of Peer
Oliver Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:49 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Spandsp and Asterisk
Eric Hall wrote:
> When back to the top-level and did a make I get this
>
> make[1]: *** [app_rxfax.o] Err
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Seth
Remington
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 9:22 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Spandsp and Asterisk
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 09:00, Eric Hall wrote:
Does anyone have an update patch file to get Sp
Eric Hall wrote:
When back to the top-level and did a make
I get this
make[1]: *** [app_rxfax.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk/apps'
make: *** [subdirs] Error 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]#
I just fought a battle with spandsp/rxfax and won.
My winning strategy can be foun
mmercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Spandsp and Asterisk
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 09:00, Eric Hall wrote:
> Does anyone have an update patch file to get Spandsp installed?
>
> I'm running asterisk CVS-HEAD-11/19/04-21:53:37 on redhat 9.0 I
> installed spandsp-0.0.2
>
&
: [Asterisk-Users] Spandsp and Asterisk
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 09:00, Eric Hall wrote:
> Does anyone have an update patch file to get Spandsp installed?
>
> I'm running asterisk CVS-HEAD-11/19/04-21:53:37 on redhat 9.0
> I installed spandsp-0.0.2
>
>
> w
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 09:00, Eric Hall wrote:
> Does anyone have an update patch file to get Spandsp installed?
>
> I'm running asterisk CVS-HEAD-11/19/04-21:53:37 on redhat 9.0
> I installed spandsp-0.0.2
>
>
> when runnig the patch I get
>
> patching file Makefile
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 41.
Does anyone have an update patch file to get Spandsp installed?
I'm running asterisk
CVS-HEAD-11/19/04-21:53:37 on redhat 9.0
I installed
spandsp-0.0.2
when runnig the
patch I get
patching file
MakefileHunk #1 FAILED at 41.Hunk #2 FAILED at 69.2 out of 2 hunks
FAILED -- saving rejec
Steve Underwood wrote:
Hi Michael,
What happens with 0.0.2pre4? For most people that version gives better
results than 0.0.1k. It seems to fix most of the quirks people have had.
spandsp says we have more pages to send. The remote fax machine sends a
disconnect message and hangs up. It sounds
Steve Underwood wrote:
Hi Michael,
What happens with 0.0.2pre4? For most people that version gives better
results than 0.0.1k. It seems to fix most of the quirks people have had.
It didn't work with the HP3150. I have a new HP5510, and I'll try
0.0.2pre4 again.
spandsp says we have more pages
Hi Michael,
Michael Welter wrote:
From the * machine, I'm able to fax (txfax) just the first page of a
multi-page document. I've tried this on a Sharp UX-P200 as well as an
HP 5510 machines with the same result. The document was assembled
using gs from a series of .ps documents.
The fax machi
From the * machine, I'm able to fax (txfax) just the first page of a
multi-page document. I've tried this on a Sharp UX-P200 as well as an
HP 5510 machines with the same result. The document was assembled using
gs from a series of .ps documents.
The fax machines are connected to an Adtran 750
Scott Lykens wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 07:41:36 +0800, Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have looked at many similar reports, and all but one turned out to be
due to data slips. However, if you are sure this is only happening with
one particular FAX machine your problem might be differ
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 07:41:36 +0800, Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have looked at many similar reports, and all but one turned out to be
> due to data slips. However, if you are sure this is only happening with
> one particular FAX machine your problem might be different. In t30.c
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On November 8, 2004 06:41 pm, Steve Underwood wrote:
I have looked at many similar reports, and all but one turned out to be
due to data slips. However, if you are sure this is only happening with
one particular FAX machine your problem might be different. In t30.c
uncomm
On November 8, 2004 06:41 pm, Steve Underwood wrote:
> I have looked at many similar reports, and all but one turned out to be
> due to data slips. However, if you are sure this is only happening with
> one particular FAX machine your problem might be different. In t30.c
> uncomment the first line.
Hi Scott,
I have looked at many similar reports, and all but one turned out to be
due to data slips. However, if you are sure this is only happening with
one particular FAX machine your problem might be different. In t30.c
uncomment the first line. Rebuild spandsp and try FAXing. You should get
Hello all.
I'm running SpanDSP 0.0.2pre4 with Asterisk v1.0 (10/23 from CVS) and
am having trouble with receiving cut off faxes from a Lexmark 6170 on
the distant end. I'm running this on a Tyan S2420 board that is about
four years old with a P3-800 and 256 MB on it.
I have tested with a PRI conn
I have been using this testing various fax machines. I have one source
that always works, Jfax. When I send my self a fax, it always gets
converted and sent.
Today I was passing the basement sysconsole and saw a bunch of debug
stuff slide by for a fax that seems to give trouble. I know l'm
suppose
Hi,
I'm having trouble running ./configure when trying to build spandsp-0.0.2. I was able to configure and build spandsp-0.0.1 just fine. Obviously, I'm missing something simple, however, I just can't figure out what it is. Maybe I'm missing some package I'm not aware of?
Here is the error fr
See http://www.opencall.org/faq/x26.html
Rodger Lewis wrote:
Using 10/12/04 cvs of asterisk and spandsp.0.0.2pre4
After changing line 86 in app_rxfax for new callerid info i got a clean
compile.
Using tiff-v3.5.7 straight from the tiff site and compiled manually no
packages.
I am getting half pages
Using 10/12/04 cvs of asterisk and spandsp.0.0.2pre4
After changing line 86 in app_rxfax for new callerid info i got a clean
compile.
Using tiff-v3.5.7 straight from the tiff site and compiled manually no
packages.
I am getting half pages. The first half of page 1 will be fine then it
goes blank.
Has anyone made spandsp to work with a digium tdm fxo card?
I finally got the rxfax and txfax modules to compile, the spandsp lib
installed (and in the libpath), and now receive:
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/1-1'
-- Executing RxFAX("Zap/1-1", "/var/fax.tif") in new stack
-- Hung
Danny Zak a écrit :
Dear;
regarding the details that i found on the site about spandsp; is it
correct to assume the following ?
+ spandsp will only work with a card that is located in the * box?
should also work with ztdummy if you don't have a card.
--
Daniel
___
301 - 400 of 535 matches
Mail list logo
