Steven Ringwald wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 22:30 +0100, Tamas wrote:
>
>> /var/log/dmesg:
>> ...
>> CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
>> CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line)
>> mtrr: v2.0 (20020519)
>> CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ stepping 02
>> Using
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 22:30 +0100, Tamas wrote:
> Hello Steven!
>
> Thanks for answers and suggestions!
> I will check the bios again tomorrow. I found some interesting things in
> /var/log/dmesg:
> ...
> CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
> CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 b
Hello Steven!
Thanks for answers and suggestions!
I will check the bios again tomorrow. I found some interesting things in
/var/log/dmesg:
...
CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line)
mtrr: v2.0 (20020519)
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Process
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 21:51 +0100, Tamas wrote:
>
> cat /proc/interrupts
>CPU0
> 0:6645053IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1: 8IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 5: 3309 IO-APIC-level eth1
> 7: 679362 IO-APIC-level eth0
>
Steven Ringwald wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 17:43 +0100, Tamas wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have some ugly numbers given by zttest for ztdummy on an AMD64 box
>> running linux-2.6.15 compiled for Athlon64.
>>
>> linux-2.6.15, zaptel/branches/1.2 r900, jiffies
>> ./zttest
>> Opened pseudo zap interfa
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 17:43 +0100, Tamas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some ugly numbers given by zttest for ztdummy on an AMD64 box
> running linux-2.6.15 compiled for Athlon64.
>
> linux-2.6.15, zaptel/branches/1.2 r900, jiffies
> ./zttest
> Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...
[snip
Hello,
I have some ugly numbers given by zttest for ztdummy on an AMD64 box
running linux-2.6.15 compiled for Athlon64.
linux-2.6.15, zaptel/branches/1.2 r900, jiffies
./zttest
Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...
99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.975586% 99.